What Is The Difference Between Rene Descartes Mind And Body

Improved Essays
Descartes thinks that the mind is better known than the body. However I do not believe that is accurate, I believe this because Descartes seems to make a mistake in regards to how the mind and the body are perceived. He thinks that they are distinctly different, and that the mind is better known. This is a false assumption that will be explored throughout the duration of this paper. Descartes famously defended the Cartesian dualist view. This view being that the mind and body are separate. They are separate in terms of substance, because they share no property with one another. Descartes first proposed the idea of doubting existence. He touched on the idea that he could doubt that his physical experiences, that his body was really there. But …show more content…
Whereas the mind is always thinking and therefore cannot be a trick. This comes from his mantra “I think therefore I am.” He believes that since the mind and body share no properties with one another they are completely different substances. One of the examples he puts forward is the notion that the body is divisible, while the mind is not. This notion can work in terms of physical objects and even one’s own body. But what if one’s brain were to be damaged. There is a multitude of neurological evidence which supports how the brain is the center in which Descartes calls the “mind.” Things like biological reactions and electrical signals in the brain when a person feels emotion or pain, etc. Building on to this idea, Descartes believes that the mind is not divisible, however, there are instances of mental trauma which can cause a person to regress mentally. This can imply that a person does not have a complete mental state. This can be said about any mental illness, they impede the ability of the individual’s mental process. These illnesses also have biological factors which can be empirically measured. Therefore there must be a correlation between the mind and the body, as one effect on the body seems to be causing additional effects on the mind. There are conceivable instances of the mind and body being separate, but that does not always mean everything conceivable can …show more content…
Unfortunately there are too many unknowns in regards to the argument. The mind and body are classified as different things, due to the fact that they have different properties. But thinking about the mind and body can be a subjective process. What you think about a particular thing is not an actual property of that thing. It is something you are subjectively determining. With that in mind each individuals view on dualism differs slightly, as the properties are often determined subjectively. Essentially Descartes says that he can doubt that his body exists, this comes from his distrust of senses and perception. Whereas he can’t doubt his mind due to the fact that he is always a thinking thing. But whether or not he can doubt his body and or mind is all dependent on him. There may be another person who does not doubt their body or their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Vs Hume

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    (130). When he says that the assertions of self are "contrary to experience", he is stating that the idea of the "self" has no impression. Since ideas must come impressions, there cannot be an idea of "self" if there are no impressions. Hume proposes the Bundle Theory of Self. He says, "But setting aside metaphysicians of this kind, I am willing to affirm of the rest of mankind that each of us is nothing but a bundle or collection of different perceptions" (Hume, 131).…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He presents his argument by mentioning how materialism is unverifiable; that we cannot verify there is an objective reality, pointless; there is no need to posit an external world, and incoherent; our senses cannot be external objects. Berkeley first point against an objective reality is to say that it is unverifiable. He argues…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Dream Argument

    • 4001 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The argument of the thinking thing can be countered and is not a clear claim. It is even unknown whether Descartes had in mind to draw a logical inference: he says that the conclusion that I exist from the fact that I 'm thinking is a self-evident perception of my state of being. The statement of, “I think, therefore I am”, is truly disguised. Your existence creates your ability to think and come to intuitions. When you doubt why you are thinking or why you have the ability to think, than you are becoming irrational.…

    • 4001 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Solipsism is a dream that one cannot wake up from or a hallucination with nobody to contradict it. The next view Nagel speaks on is skepticism on the external world. He indicates that the only certain thing we know is not knowing anything. For a lack of better words, skepticism can be described as an “I don’t know” approach. He explains that our minds are the only real thing that exists or that we don’t even know if there is a world that exists external to our own minds.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How would you feel if everything you encountered in life, you were apprehensive about? Most people would consider you paranoid or eccentric, but this was exactly what the philosopher Descartes was accredited for. In Sophie’s World by Joseph Gaarder, Descartes is one of the philosophers discussed and one who I dissented with. I comprehend his way of thinking, but I do not necessarily agree to it. Descartes’s thought development followed a series of points I disagreed with – senses may not be reliable, there are two classifications of reality, and a perfect entity has to exist being as the idea is already in the mind.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Avicenna in his major work Kitab Al-Najat argues that the human soul is not material. He argues that the rational faculty, namely the soul, does not know through physical organ. In this sense, he can prove that the soul is not inhered in the material body, therefore indicating that the soul is immaterial. Avicenna argued in Kitab Al-Najat that “for there is no organ between the rational faculty and itself, nor does one intervene between it and its organ or between it and the fact that it knows”. (Avicenna, 51) As in his previous argument and experience, the rational faculty has direct access to the knowledge of itself without any intermediary.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From Parfit’s perspective, I believe that no one can identify what the result would conclude. I think it would be a misleading argument to assume one body could compose of two consciousness’s as it is not understood by humans. Parfit’s thoughts on living in the present moment and not contemplating the past are powerful. From this Parfit rationalized that people are constantly changing mentally and physically. Parfit’s response to the branch line case does not hold him accountable as he states the answer is neither true or false but empty.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He believed that the mind is separate from the body and that Descartes looked at words in referecnce to a thing and not a catergory. Ryle argues, "I hope to prove that it is entirely false, and false not in detail but in principle. It is not merely an assemblage of particular mistakes. It is one big mistake and a mistake of a special kind.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Descartes leaves many weak spots in his argument, Searle chooses probably the most difficult position to articulate. Searle attempts to explain why Descartes’ argument of mind-body distinction is not really an argument at all and that the two traditional default positions of the argument, materialism and dualism, are not accurate representations as to what the real problem is and should be discarded. Searle’s purpose is to destroy any remaining idea of Cartesian dualism and introduce a much better way of thinking about how humans are, a refutation of the default positions and a transition to a more comprehensive view on the…

    • 1028 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of this Sartre claimed that we are “Condemned to be free.” Sartre's views may be viewed as liberating and logical, but our knowledge of the world firmly supports that we may not be as free as he artistically expressed. Sartre believed that all men are free. He held that we do not make our choices because of a deity’s commands. Sartre believes in no god. Additionally, Sartre maintained that we do not make our decisions because of our nature or our nurture (two of the main deterministic arguments).…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays