Compare And Contrast Descartes And Locke

Improved Essays
Researchers like René Descartes and John Locke came to populate that modern research landscape by continuing to postulate their own philosophies about human nature and nurture, to observably different outcomes. Descartes posited that some ideas, such as God and infinity, are innate and perfect and since Descartes claims himself as imperfect, he realises that he alone could not have authored these perfect ideas (Descartes, 1637/1956). These ideas were not part of his personal accounts, and therefore, the ideas had to be placed inside his mind by an existence more perfect than he was, which was God (Descartes, 1637/1956). In addition, Descartes does claim that since God would not deceive us, our sensory perception can be trusted to acquire physical …show more content…
Thus, Locke may posit that ideas are not innate but the mental operations are, hinting at a partly nativist view. Both René Descartes and John Locke, like Plato and Aristotle respectively, both have their own positions on whether we are biologically shaped or environmentally shaped. However, Descartes and Locke do have certain concepts of the ideas that crossover. Descartes suggest a nativist view of innate ideas (nature) but yet also says that sensory perception can be trusted to receive information in order to be scrutinized (nurture), while Locke says that we are a ‘blank slate’ and we receive all information through sensation (nurture) but the mental operations rearranging the sensory information are innate (nature). This shows that although philosophers like Descartes and Locke clearly have their own extreme positions on the debate, there is no denying the admittance that nature and nurture are both factors in human ideas and traits. Both sides of the debate have described too many “facts” that renders the “one factor is king” stand essentially …show more content…
This question was outlined by Sir Francis Galton in the late 19th century, who conceptualised the ‘nature vs nurture’ debate as we know it. Galton was more a nativist, suggesting that empiricism is inherited and suggested heredity dominance in human trait and intelligence formation. Galton assumes, like Aristotle, that people know the world through sensory perception, so the more accurate the sensory perception, the more intelligent the person is supposed to be. Yet, Galton reasoned that since sensory perception is a natural skill, intelligence is thus inherited, which is more along the lines of Plato’s teaching (Hergenhahn, 2005). This thought bled into Galton’s eugenics research whereby if intelligence is truly inherited and if more intelligent people were encouraged to breed with each other and less intelligent people were discouraged to breed, a more intelligent population can be produced (Galton, 1869). Galton’s nativist ideals generated a sort of positive and negative eugenics system where natural superiority produces “geniuses”. However, when Galton, for his book English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture (1874), conducted a survey (also the first use of the questionnaire in psychology!) on 200 of his fellow scientists on their “scientific”

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Compare how the two philosophers Thomas Hobbs and John Locke, in an ideal state, who should have the power and how much power the ruler should have. First, we need to establish what is an ideal state. According to the two of them. Next, compare them both to one another and then try to explain their arguments. By describing their views in our own words.…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nature Vs Nurture Debate

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Every human is made differently. From the day they are born, no two strands of DNA are even close to being similar. Not only is everyone’s chemical makeup different, but the way one is raised and adapts to the world varies greatly from anyone else, but what makes the most difference is the way that one’s nature or the way one is nurtured effects them. This debate has been ongoing ever since it was brought up in 1869 by Sir Francis Galton. “Medicine Net” is a well known medical website which explains the theory, “In the context of the nature vs. nurture debate, ‘nature’ refers to biological/genetic predispositions’ impact on human traits, and nurture describes the influence of learning and other influences from one’s environment” (MedicineNet).…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essay 3 Given what we know or can safely assume to be true of animal brains and behaviors, do animals actually exhibit thought and reason? The answer depends in large measure on one’s definition of thought and reason. Philosophers René Descartes and David Hume hold conflicting views about the nature and possession of thought and reason and, as a result, offer starkly different arguments for and against the existence of thought and reason in animals. While Descartes maintains in Part Five of Discourse on Method that only humans are capable of conscious thought, Hume asserts that human and animal behaviors are not so different in Section Nine of his An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes Vs Locke Essay

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Descartes v. Locke Rene Descartes and John Locke are two philosophers of the 17th century who study on what the self is and how the mind and body are associated together. Although Descartes and Locke share some ideas, they do have different and significant examples explaining their beliefs. Rene Descartes has 6 Meditations in a treatise written by himself called “Meditations on First Philosophy” in which 3 are important. Two of the important Meditations are the 5th and 6th Meditations and they talk about the essence and existence of material things. Additionally, the 2nd Meditation was important in which Descartes brings a specific example involving wax in which there are 2 qualities; primary and secondary.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Nature versus Nurture argument has been a complicated altercation for the past two centuries. While the ideas involved in the debate have existed for hundreds of years, the argument itself began in the 19th century. It can be considered one of the oldest arguments in history. Nativists and empiricists are the two names coined for those unequivocally declaring either nature or nurture as their standpoint. Nativists are for the nature side, which is in contrast to empiricists who are for the nurture perspective.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The following assignment will be to demonstrate the qualities of the Lockean position over and against that of Descartes. The primary point I need to make is that Locke composes widely in part XVII of his second book while the Cartesian comprehension of self is somewhat oversimplified. For the Cartesian self is contained in the straightforward, but stacked, word cogito. Self is contained in the cognizance and this is a piece of the psyche body dualism; the body can't think separated from the awareness of a reasoning personality; these connected substances make up self. In any case, the issue with this announcement is that it doesn't consider the should act naturally mindful which Locke addresses.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believes that a person should not rely on their senses to give them proof of absolute truths. However, based on the idea of the Painter’s Analogy, a person must put some trust in their senses to have any experiences at all, dreamed or not. According to Descartes, one’s faith in knowledge can not be derived entirely from their senses, as sometimes, our senses fail us, or are even dreamed (Descartes 3). Despite this finding, this statement is referring to broad topics, and when we examine the smaller pieces of the grand scheme, we can understand that we must perceive to dream. Descartes himself has this theory, but believes that an empiricist view, which states “that all knowledge is derived from sense experience”, is too far of an…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Nature is the genetic inheritance and biological influences, while nurture is the external factors, such as environment and life experiences. The nature-nurture debate concerned with the extent to which aspects of behavior are a product human, whether nature (i.e. genetic influence) or nurture (i.e., acquired learning or environmental factors). The debate allows psychologists to study various aspects of human development which include intelligence, personality, and mental illness. However, different field of psychology often takes one side of the approach. For example, biological psychology tends to flavor the nature factors since they are studying about genetics and the on influences.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ideas are defined as whatever is perceived or understood about something; despite this simple denotation, humankind 's capacity to acquire and understand these complex thoughts remains a controversy in philosophical literature. As major role models in the foundation of modern philosophy, Descartes and Locke feud over the definition of these ideas, the acquisition of these concepts, and the content of these thoughts. Descartes identifies with a rationalistic view where knowledge is based on innate ideas and these ideas are acquired through reason, whereas Locke believes in empirical explanations which state that ideas are formulated from sensory experiences with the outside world. In many of Descartes’ works, he emphasizes the importance of…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Therefore, in this essay, I will be looking into the process of two philosopher’s arguments and comparing them. In addition, I will reveal that Locke’s argument against Innateness of the idea of God could be questionable based on his theory of obtaining true knowledge and idea. Rene Descartes asserts the principle of innate idea in the one of his philosophical treatise named “Meditations on First…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes and Locke don't give the same responses to these inquiries. In this paper I will consider the likenesses and contrasts between the rationalities of Descartes and Locke. I will first quickly consider a few similitudes. I will then examine a couple of critical contrasts in their hypotheses of information (in particular the refinement in the middle of logic and observation and the topic of the presence of inherent thoughts). At long last, I will consider the more unpretentious refinement between the Cartesian and Lockean records of self, the part of the brain, and the psyche/body qualification.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although René Descartes and John Locke, were both considered great philosophers of their time; they are also well known for their opposing views on the Self. Descartes and Locke, both explored the nature of knowledge and the nature of self. As mentioned in the book, they both shared a scientific perspective in developing knowledge through clear thinking, analysis, and real world observation and experimentation. Descartes and Locke, both attempted to answer the same questions related to knowledge. However, Descartes and Locke did not have the same answers to these questions related to knowledge because, Locke took a different approach in answering them.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    x Rene Descartes and John Locke, both seventeenth century philosophers, have their own individual views and opinions pertaining to particular subjects such as the origin of ideas. Both of these philosophers attempt to find answers to many of the same questions in epistemology as well as metaphysics. While Descartes is a rationalist, Locke is an imperialist; his ideas come from experience. Locke and Descartes have differing views on various multiple subjects, but both philosophers support their opinions effectively.…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays