Compare And Contrast Dalai Lama And John Locke

Decent Essays
When comparing John Locke and Dalai Lama, they both agree that tolerance is key even if you're enemies. Locke's theory of the state of nature is tied to his theory of natural law, since the latter defines the rights of persons and their status as free and equal. The stronger the grounds for accepting Locke's characterization of people as free, equal, and independent, the more helpful the state of nature becomes as a device for representing people. According to Locke, we know only the rights and responsibilities they have toward one another. Opponents, antagonists or enemies are teaching you. From them, you are learning about your strengths and where you need to improve. You can learn if you pay attention and are determined to do better next

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    What does it mean to be a Great American? MLK Jr. and Abraham Lincoln were both great men that led people to a better society through replacing injustice with a vision of equality that resonated with people. Because of this, these men have their own memorial in D.C.. Is it time to add a new memorial to go along with these leaders? Tecumseh was a Shawnee chief who led a large tribal resistance to settlers.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Frederick Douglass differs from H. D. Thoreau in the sense that he doesn’t believe that all government is oppressive and manipulative. When it came to the issue of slavery, an injustice recognized by most, Douglass felt true in his convictions to do whatever possible to end such an inequality. He may have changed his opinion on the Constitution around 1851 once the issue of slavery became more of a prejudice than an oppressive institution centered around injustice towards people’s senses of equality and freedom. He clearly understood there to be a time for rebellion to the current system in place if everything isn’t reflective of the principles set out in the Declaration of Independence and the preamble of the Constitution. “It shall not avail that the Constitution and…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. define the profound difference between just and unjust in their writings, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” While the two men have a different sound throughout each of their own pieces, there is much that they agree upon about civil disobedience once clearly thought out and read. With that being said, this paper will, respectively, discuss the general content of both writings, as well as the prominent similarities and differences noticeable in the two pieces. An example of political/cultural problems the United States is facing today that emulate civil disobedience will also be presented that link to both pieces. Towards the end of this paper, I intend…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civility or Uncivility There was a time where being civil and polite, it was the way of life. Where people were able to restrain themselves of rude comments, behaviors and hold themselves to a higher social standard. To be civil, we must have learned growing up to respect others and to have enough self-awareness to be courteous and mind their actions. It’s vital to install such moral as to keep the peace amongst each other.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To be able to inspire and help others by merely speaking is a remarkable talent. John Fitzgerald Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. inspire, motivate, and transform the lives of others through their examples and speeches. On January 20, 1961 President Kennedy gave his influential “Inaugural Address” to the nation, asking for a change. King also demands a change when he gave his “I Have A Dream” speech on August 28, 1963. The 1960’s are a controversial period not only for our nation, but for the whole world.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thoreau’s essay is also different from King’s because he presents more than one goal. Not only does he describe the government’s unfair laws, but he also teaches his readers how and why to revolt, and tells them to bring an end to the ongoing Mexican War. Despite these differences, both Thoreau and King share strong similar beliefs of morality and justice that are clearly seen throughout the entirety of both essays. Both authors in their respective essays tell the people why and how they should fight for justice. They explain that in order to fight for justice, we must first distinguish between the just and unjust laws.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi and Osama Bin Laden; two names that can immediately make you feel at ease and then distressed by having them so close in proximity to each other. These names don’t seem to fit together and definitely don’t seem as though they should be together on the same page. Despite their obvious differences, though, they can be seen as alike in some ways. Granted, one was a man who stood up for peace while the other stood up for violence; but both of them were very successful in motivating people to act on behalf of their visions. These two very well known men were able to cause a change in the world, some extremely good and some extremely bad, both with the unfortunate end of their lives at the hand of their opposers.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Henry David Thoreau were both great literary figures in the United States, yet they lived in different time periods. Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” and King’s Letter to Birmingham Jail”are quite similar, in addition obtain certain differences between the texts. Both writers demonstrate each other 's audience on ways of being civilly disobedient towards their corrupt government and how to have a relationship with them. On the other hand, certain differences, both texts possess are whom it was addressed to as well as the occasions and appeal. Both texts fractions in similarities and differences through their analysis, such as occasion, strategies used, and other figures used in their writings.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cesar Chavez and Gandhi are different person but they are the same in a way. They had fought for the same thing and that is for there rights both of they fought right thing. Like Cesar Chavez he had fought for farmers rights and the most famous thing he had said was “Si, se puede”. Also Gandhi had fought for being free from the British that had ruled India and South Africa at the time. But I think that Cesar Chavez is a better hero they Gandhi because Cesar help farmer by get they better pay and better conditions for working.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke and Jean-Jacque Rousseau present themselves as very distinct philosophers. They both use similar terms, such as, the State of Nature, but conceptualize them differently. In my paper, I will argue that Locke’s argument on his proposed state of nature and civil society is more realistic in our working society than Rousseau’s theory. At the core of their theories, Locke and Rousseau both agree that we all begin in a State of Nature in that everyone should be “equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection,” in which we are free with no government or laws to guide one’s behavior.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This quote is tremendously important to remember while fighting for your rights. I am able to relate to this quote because of my religion. Other than spreading love, Islam teaches us that fighting injustice unjustly is unjust. To me this quote means that we should always avoid violence no matter the circumstance. For example, in a war if two countries are treating each other with violence only and have hatred toward each other, then the only result will be more violence.…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Sociologically Examined Life: Pieces of a Conversation by Michael Schwalbe reviews what is meant by the sociological perspective or, as he calls it, being “sociologically mindful.” Explaining that the sociological perspective involves paying attention to social life and looking at the world from multiple points of view in order to appreciate the uniqueness of others and to ensure that everyone has access to the “good life,” Schwalbe opens by stating “If you would like a written portrait of the discipline of sociology, you can find one in many places—but not here” (2). What one does find here within these pages, however, is a guide to becoming more aware of one’s surroundings and a way of becoming more connected to the people near and far.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers John Locke and George Berkeley agreed that knowledge is derived from experience. However, while Locke argued that knowledge is also acquired through our senses, such as, primary qualities, the perception, and secondary qualities, the object perceived, Berkeley argued that our minds and ideas are the sole essence of most knowledge, except knowledge of self and knowledge of God. As a subjective idealist, he believed that physical objects only exist as they are perceived. More specifically, there are no primary or secondary properties of objects in themselves, and also, matter cannot be discovered through sensory perception. Both philosophers claimed that knowledge comes through experience, but Berkeley argues that material objects cannot exist if not experienced.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two philosophers that have heavily influenced the world of philosophy as we now know it, René Descartes and John Locke, have not always agreed on the same beliefs. In fact, they almost always argued on what each other felt was true except for the unlikely agreement on a few things. This brings me to one particular argument dealing with the issue on innate ideas. Descartes side of the argument believes that we born with ideas (innate ideas) and Locke believes our ideas come from experience and the senses. Ideas have to stem off of something and the only way for us to have that base for an idea is to experience it.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays