• Home Page
  • Compare And Contrast Tennessee And Alabama Selection Of Judges

Compare And Contrast Tennessee And Alabama Selection Of Judges

Improved Essays
Show More
The following essay is how Tennessee and Alabama selection of judges and the dismissal of judges is compared and contrast after researching here`s my findings:
The Tennessee Judicial selection Commission consists of three Members nominated by the Tennessee Trial Lawyers Association, three members nominated by the Tennessee Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, three members nominated by the Tennessee Bar Association, five lawyer members that are not criminal or personal injury attorneys, three members nominated by the Tennessee District Attorney 's Conference and three non-lawyer members. The three non-governmental nominating organizations must have a representative for Eastern, Middle, and Western Tennessee. (Judicial Selection Commission …show more content…
The qualifications for the Supreme Court: licensed to practice law 10 years; 1 year resident; maximum age of 70. Court of Criminal Appeals: licensed to practice law 10 years; 1 year resident; maximum age of 70. Court of Civil Appeals: licensed to practice law 10 years; 1 year resident; maximum age of 70. The Circuit Court: licensed to practice law 5 years; 1 year resident of circuit; maximum age of 70. The selection process of judges for the state of Alabama the same for a full term which is partisan election, for Interim Vacancies gubernatorial appointment selection process takes place. However the selection process for Chief Judge and Justice is based on a different type of vote. Supreme court is based on popular vote, Court of appeals and Circuit Courts is based on peer votes, while Court of Civil Appeals is based on seniority. (Methods of Judicial Selection: Tennessee, …show more content…
They can be removed through impeachment, before their schedule retirement age. Removing judges in Alabama for disciplinary actions can be done in one or two ways. First, the judicial inquiry commission investigates complaints against judges and file complaint with the court of judiciary. From there, the court of judiciary may suspend, censure, or remove the judge. If the judge want to appeal they can appeal it with the Supreme Court of Alabama. Secondly, judge may simply be impeached. Tennessee,judges may also be removed in one of two ways. First,the judge may be impeached by the house of representatives and convicted by two-thirds vote of the senate. Secondly, once recommended by the court of judiciary, the general assembly may remove judges by a two-thirds vote of both houses, with each house voting separately. (Methods of Judicial Selection ,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Missouri Non-Partisan Court Plan Case Study
    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Missouri Non-Partisan Court Plan Case Study

    1. In your opinion, please discuss the “pros and cons” of the Missouri Non-Partisan Court Plan. (Please include the advantages and/or disadvantages of partisan judicial elections and whether, in your opinion, is a better system for choosing state judges. When talking about a state judge selection, the best way to elect a judge is by the Missouri Non-Partisan Court Plan. But there are many pros and cons to each side of this choice!…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution Case Analysis
    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Articles Of Confederation And The Constitution Case Analysis

    Once impeached, the NV Senate conducts a trial in which a 2/3 vote is required to gain a conviction. If the judge is convicted, he or she is removed from the bench. The second removal method, called legislative address, is used when the Assembly and Senate remove a judge for any reasonable cause. A 2/3 vote of members in each house of the NV Legislature is required to remove a judge by legislative…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Summary: The Scottsboro Trial
    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Summary: The Scottsboro Trial

    Additionally, in this trial, the implications of an elected versus appointed judge can be seen. Judge Horton did the right thing by overturning the conviction of Haywood Patterson, he did so at great risk. Horton, an elected judge, basically ended his career with this move. It is this situation that leads me to believe that judges should be appointed rather than elected. Not every judge, especially when put in a situation like this, would have the integrity to ignore the political ramifications of their decision.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Vs. Johnson: An Analysis Of The Supreme Court Case
    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Texas Vs. Johnson: An Analysis Of The Supreme Court Case

    Texas vs. Johnson (An analysis of the supreme court case Texas vs. Johnson and the current repercussions of the decision) The first amendment protects many of our basic rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, etc. The framers of our constitution left a broad wording to leave room for our country to grow and change as time went on. One of the adjustments our country has made over time is to define the actions and words protected under the freedom of speech. There are three basic categories of free speech; pure speech, is communication only through words, speech plus is speech plus an aid such as a sign or a chant, and symbolic speech, an action that communicates meaning without the use of words.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Supreme Court Decisions And The Attitudinal Model
    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Supreme Court Decisions And The Attitudinal Model

    1. The Supreme Court decisions in a case affect significantly the entire country’s legal system. Therefore, models of judicial decision making were created to explain the Supreme Court’s behavior and how they influence policies. While the legal, attitudinal and the strategic model are not the only theories of judicial decision making, those constitute the most prevalent hypotheses to explain judicial decisions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Local Trial Courts In Texas
    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Local Trial Courts In Texas

    Local Trial Courts in Texas There are two types of local trial courts in Texas: Municipal Courts and Justice of Peace Courts. The first type has limited criminal jurisdiction. Municipal Courts are created by Texas Legislature to work at the city level. The amount of courts in each location depends up its population and public needs.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Merit Selection In Texas
    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Merit Selection In Texas

    When our founding fathers created the American Constitution, it was very clear that they wanted the judicial system to be free from political influence. There are many opinions on how to achieve this goal: appointment by the governor, election by the voters and the merit selection. The merit select is a method of choosing judges using a nonpartisan commission of locate, investigate, evaluate and recruit applicants for the judicial system. Once the applicants have been selected the governor then makes the final decision. The selected judge serves a specific amount of time (typically one term) and then placed on a ballot, not as candidate but instead to ask voters if the judges should remain in office.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Shelby County V. Holder Supreme Court Case Analysis
    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Shelby County V. Holder Supreme Court Case Analysis

    Each creating a broader scope for the act and expanding the definition of voting rights. The act was intended to be temporary and was not intended to be ongoing legislation. In 2013, changes towards the Voting Rights Act was put to the test in the case Shelby County v. Holder Supreme Court case, splitting the court in a 5-4 decision ruling parts of the Voting Rights Act unconstitutional. In this essay I will articulate what the court majority did in their Shelby County decision. I will also discuss why I agree with the…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Vs Johnson Flag Burning Analysis
    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Texas Vs Johnson Flag Burning Analysis

    Both articles describe the situation of the flag burning by Gregory Lee Johnson was a criminal act that should be penalized for, but the text of each of them explain their own opinionated answer on why so. The Texas vs Johnson Majority Opinion’s tone was more analytical, however, the editorial’s tone was a thoughtful and virtuous. Firstly, Texas vs Johnson, Majority Opinion article explicates the court case of Johnson about the burning of the flag in analytical tone. “We submit that nobody can suppose that this one gesture of an unknown man will change our Nation’s attitude toward its flag.”…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Positives And Negatives Of Andrew Jackson: A Controversial President
    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Positives And Negatives Of Andrew Jackson: A Controversial President

    Andrew Jackson was a very controversial President. There are multiple positives and negatives to Andrew Jackson. Andrew is America’s great worst President. I am going to discuss and tell you if you he was a good or bad President is his term from March 4, 1829- March 4, 1837. Before Andrew Jackson was President, he had nine slaves.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On The Judicial Branch
    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Essay On The Judicial Branch

    First, a judge has to be nominated by the President (stated in Article II Section 2 in the U.S. Constitution) Obama can replace whomever he wants to (filling in for Justice Scalia) Once the President has nominated a judge, the Senate Judiciary Committee needs to confirm and the President needs to appoint the new judge. Secondly, the Judiciary Committee has a three step process as to confirming a supreme court judge. Firstly, the Committee does an investigation into the judge’s background. Next, the Committee will hold a public hearing in which the judge is questioned and gives testimonies about everything from his or her judicial philosophy to his or her stand on abortion.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Study
    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Brothel Boy Case Study

    The federal judges are nominated by the President of the United States, and approved but the United States Senate. With having the definitive authority in the courts, the judge is the only one who can set bail, instruct jurors about the meaning of the law, and impose sentences. With a plea of guilty, it is the quickest way to resolve a heavy caseload for not only the judge, but also the prosecutors and defense…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case
    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    Alabama of 1932 was a landmark case in American history. The case brought to the forefront the issue of legal counsel being guaranteed by the 6th Amendment, and how that right applied to the States by the 14th Amendment. This case brought up the issues and concerns of what the requirements of the State was in this type of criminal proceedings. Due Process wasn’t given to the African American men in this case. The Incorporation Doctrine within the Fourteenth Amendment will now serve as a series of checks and balances so that state governments can’t make sure not to violate these rights that are given to our…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Miller Vs Alabama Case Study
    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Miller Vs Alabama Case Study

    Evan Miller has had a rough upbringing. He has had emotional abandonment from his alcoholic and drug abused mother, his abusive father and forced to be placed in multiple foster cares throughout his childhood. Miller is a prime example of an abandoned, troubled minor, whose true destiny has been destroyed due to these circumstances. The problems he has faced steered him to being depressed and unsatisfied, using drugs, alcohol and four suicide attempts to trying and fulfill the emptiness he has been feeling his entire life.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Should Judges Be Elected Or Appointed Essay
    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Should Judges Be Elected Or Appointed Essay

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings