Comparative Analysis Of ' Lines 507-520 & 360-369 ' Essay examples

1156 Words 5 Pages
Comparative Analysis in Lysistrata
Lines 507-520 & 360-369
I will argue that these two passages are a commentary on the state of masculinity in this play. These two passages reveal the fragility of masculinity. This fragility is revealed through their tendency for violence and aggression, poor decision-making abilities and absolute refusal to be questioned about their decisions. Aristophanes uses these passages to remark on how instead of men being the stronger sex, their fragile masculinity ultimately makes them inferior to women.
When the Councilor attempts to end the women’s siege on the Acropolis, Lysistrata confronts him on the damage men have inflicted to the society through the war. Lysistrata pokes fun at the “big boy[s]” (518). Her tone of mocking and choice of diction indicate that men are no more than overgrown boys. They lack the maturity and ability to make important choices about the war. Their decisions are often “subnormally thought-out”, “doom-laden” and even “malignant” (518). The incorporation of malignant is particularly telling. Malignant is often associated with cancerous tumors and is defined as causing harm or suffering. Not only are the decisions made by the men lacking in thought, they cause more harm than good, leading to a “futile war” (507). The effect on women is twofold: they are suffering from the war and completely unable to contribute to how the war just be handled. After “aching” and simpering” to their actions (512), the women are…

Related Documents