The royalty is about $0.05 per K-Cup to support advertising and market development. One of the problems with the K-Cups and not only Keurig’s was that they were only available online, which may have affected sales at that time. Yet, they fixed the problem by making them available in some retail stores. Many competitors started to use new marketing propagandas, paying millions for advertisements. Keurig used its money to put testing booths in stores to get people to buy them. They should’ve split the money and balanced the money on advertising and testing …show more content…
marketplace’s potential. Industry analyst Scott Van Winkle pointed to the success of Nespresso S.A., a business of Nestle Group, in Europe as an indicator of the potential for Keurig in the United States: “I could see Keurig’s market share for coffee makers grow close to 50 percent based on the precedent set by Nespresso in Europe, where they have reached the 40 percent range.” Initially introduced in Switzerland in 1986, Nespresso’s single serve espresso machine experienced a slow start until the mid-1990s, when it entered a period of rapid growth. According to the company, Nespresso achieved organic growth of more than 20 percent in 2010 and estimated “global market shares of around 20 percent in the segment of espresso and filter portioned coffee