What Role Does The National Court Play In The European Union?

Improved Essays
European integration led to the empowerment of its other institutions, the Court of justice of the European Union (CJEU) as a result has taken an essential active role in the European Union by forming the Union’s legal order. Initially, the European Union envisaged as an international organisational for the purposes for economic and political interest has further developed in which the courts have permitted individuals to enforce rights under European Union law in national courts. Although the CJEU is the leading figure in the change of the European Union’s legal order, the national court also plays an essential role in the EU by administering EU law because the Union is a decentralised system administered mostly at the national level and not at European level. The …show more content…
Interaction between the national courts and ECJ is essential to the European Union by contributing in the improvement of the judicial system and quality of the ECJ case law. At lower levels, there are particular areas which would not need the services of the ECJ to Judge and it would be suggested that additional granted to National courts may prove that national courts are not ‘pawns’ or ‘agents’ but an active essential branch of the European legal order. It may be suggested that a reference will be of better value when the problems before the national courts and the implications of the answer is understood. It would be productive to refer, once the vital facts have been set and the national courts forms its own provisional view of the answer which would be set out in the reference. Jacob suggests that where this is executed it will provide advantages that will be set out below. Enabling the ECJ to understand the concerns of the national court and the substance of the issue. National court providing provisional answers may also develop the national legal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION This essay examines the Australian court hierarchy, and the extension power the High Court attains as it has the ability too overturn decisions made by the Supreme Court. As it is the final court of appeal therefore reintegrates the point that the power of appointment is held within the body of the High Court. As the Australian Federal system consists of national court and a court system for each individual state and the two territories.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, although the case of R v Brown highlighted that the mere statement of Premier Newman was insufficient to cause the public to undermine the judiciary, the functions of Chapter III courts should not be given, so as to diminish the public confidence in the court’s impartial exercise of judicial power. The legislation that was limiting the discretion of the courts in R v Brown, which further caused debate, are creating a potential for public confidence of the courts to be weakened in their impartial exercise of judicial…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Analysis: The Jury System

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Jury System by Kenneth Jost Are major changes needed? Should peremptory challenges be abolished? 1. What is at issue? What is the claim behind this issue?…

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Models Of Judicial Decision-Making. n.p.: Macmillan Reference USA, 2008. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dynamic Court View

    • 2579 Words
    • 11 Pages

    United States of America consists of the most diverse and complex societies in the world, with equally extensive legal system. Its legal system is ostensibly different from other countries, for its peculiarity, and in that reason, US legal system is heavily critiqued, commended, and condemned both at home and abroad. Seemingly, the Constrained Court View versus the Dynamic Court view is the most prevalent debate surrounding American judiciary system. This controversy is a deep-rooted argument tracing back to the founding fathers, who discussed whether our chosen forum for orderly dispute resolution is dynamic and flexible or constrained and limited in its ability. Some argue American legal system is undoubtedly dynamic and capable of spurring…

    • 2579 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sports law is relevant to the administration of sports and a person’s participation in sport whether they play at amateur, professional or international level. The legal issues that arise from a sporting activity can involve aspects of contract law, torts, anti-discrimination, trade practice and criminal law The most common procedure involves breaches of the rules of the game that are contrary to the principles of the game that are seen as being against the morals of sportsmanship. From this point this is able to be dealt with by the governing bodies through possibly being sent to a tribunal and then Governing bodies Most commonly it can be seen that parliament does not make law regarding sports as a result they leave the decision to…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In every community, there is a set of rules to follow, which is found in the code of the street. The Code of the Street, according to the book, “Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City” by Elijah Anderson, explains more what the code of the street is and why people do things a certain way by saying, “This is because the street culture has evolved a “code of the street” which amounts to a set of informal rules governing interpersonal public behavior. (pg.33).” While the Code of the Street can be seen as a list of rules, it is a lifestyle and a set example of how to do things. One part of the Code of the street is no snitching.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Conversely, there are factors that may hinder the achievements of its goal. Crown courts are very busy and have a budget. Some cases that should have been held on a particular day may not be done due to organisation issues or running over (McClenaghan, 2013). This can lead to packed days of cases that need to be reviewed. Furthermore, if prisons are not organised for video calls for hearings, cases can over-run which cost the court and means that some cases cannot be covered within the time given.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to understand the Court’s role in today’s government, one must understand its history. The Court’s origins are deeply rooted in the philosophic…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    How is your role in government different from an elected official? The role I play in Government is my job is look over all of the evidence and understand it, and make sure every piece of evidence is presented. Also, the President appoints us rather than a Political Party which appoints elected officials. How is it the same? Judges and Elected officials share a common characteristic in the sense that both of us only want the best for the nation and the people.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Importance Of Duty Of Care

    • 4284 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Last accessed 8th April 2013 HRCR. (1981). Young, James & Webster v. United Kingdom, 44 Eur. Ct. H.R. (ser.…

    • 4284 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This report will put forth Dworkin’s case and evaluate his premises by discussing important arguments that exist both in favour and against them, in terms of theoretical soundness and practical feasibility. To begin with, Dworkin distinguishes between “weak discretion” and “strong discretion”, specifying the latter to be the topic of contention. By “strong discretion”, he refers to judges exercising judicial discretion…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    EXPLAIN THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF ENGLAND AND WALES AND THOSE OF CIVIL LAW COUNTRIES AND EXPLAIN THE MERITS AND PROBLEMS OF THESE LEGAL SYSTEMS A HISTORY OF TWO TYPES OF LAW The two main systems of law in the world today are common law and civil law. The system used in England and Wales is common law which has an evolving history dating from the Norman conquest of England in 1066 and the local customs of the Anglo-Saxons. English common law spread throughout the world during the growth of the British empire between the 16th and 18th centuries.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitutional Court and the Court of Cassation of the Republic of Armenia are constitutional bodies as they are defined by the Constitution. The latter defines the structure, the procedure of formation and the functions of the Constitutional and Cassation courts. These courts are bodies of justice and are included in the branch of judicial power that is defined in Chapter 6 of the 2005 Constitution of RA. Both of these courts are component parts of the judicial system. They are separate and independent from the executive and the legislative powers.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The role of Judges in our court system is one of the most important roles within our relative communities, they are the main point of interpretation when it comes to the law. Be it civil or criminal, they assess the evidence, and hopefully have an unbiased mind towards the pursuit of justice. Despite legislature being made through Parliament, Judges are able to teach the people through the means of precedent what laws actually mean. They help the general public to know to what extent they are abiding by the law and punishable offences under the law. The question that is being asked is whether or not Judges have the right to be creative in their rulings, or should they simply apply the law just the way it is?…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays