Communism Vs Utopianism

Improved Essays
While international relations scholars primarily focus on the present interactions between states, and the events which lead up to them, they also predict future the development of the global system. Therefore, there are two diverging paths upon which the state of global affairs can develop in the future: degradation or utopianism.
The international relations scholar, Fukuyama, thinks the latter will occur. Believing that history is "a battle to determine which form of government is the best"(Fukuyama), liberalism will prevail over all other types of administration. This "liberal triumph" will originally be "in the realm of ideas or consciousness"(Fukuyama), but economic liberalism will follow. Moreover, this progressive viewpoint is similar

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    3. Europe was devastated by World War II and the situation was worsened when it was divided between the East and the West. The East being Russian and its puppet satellite states. The West being the US and other democratic nations. When Stalin returned to Russia the country was in a terrible state.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In addition, Hobhouse summarises the chapter by claiming that ‘Heart of Liberalism’ is the acknowledgement that the “progress is not a matter of mechanical contrivance, but of the liberation of living spiritual energy”. By stating that Leonard Hobhouse again highlights the priority of human development and pushes this emphasis further than classical liberals (Freeden,…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The End of History?”, by Francis Fukuyama he raises the position that nationalism and communism were two major consequences of the inability to establish a liberal democracy. As the USSR collapsed in 1992, researches have begun to question if the two main factors, nationalism and communism, led to the fall of this empire. Throughout my analysis, I will approach the effects of communism and nationalism on the collapse of the soviet union, by comparing and contrasting these points to Fukuyamas claim. These concepts will support my case that, a communist society will eventually fail and a liberal democracy will be the final form of government. Francis Fukuyama argued that a liberal democracy is the final form of human government.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Francis Fukuyama¬, in his piece of writing ‘End of History’, was wrong, while propounding ‘Western Liberalism’ as an ultimate form of human civilization and his struggle towards democracy and liberalism. After the fall of the USSR, the USA & its western allies-so called beacon of democracy & liberal values- burying their heads in sand started considering their values of democracy & liberalism as an ultimate solution for war-torn & poverty-stricken third world countries and equating rest of the world as west-versus-rest. Fragile foundations of liberalism dig its own grave and prove fatal for its future imperialistic version of –so called- utopian world. Dust from Brexit is settling economic…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anthem by: Ayn Rand Communist society Vs. Capitalist society Life in the U.S. would be completely different if communism won in World War 2. Ayn Rand is an author that escaped from the communist Soviet Union. She wrote a book titled Anthem showing a horrific dystopian society ruled by communism. In this book the main character is a boy named Equality who lives in this dystopian society.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a seemingly way, a Utopia is thought to be an idealistic way of living. A utopia is a perfect place where everyone is happy, free and equal for the most part. usually a utopia seems to be a very wonderful place on the surface, but has corruption under it. by corruption this could mean a harsh government, or a monarchy, a sacrifice or just a bad sponge. distopias on the other hand are the opposite of utopias, for the most part that is.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Various schools of international system theorists like Waltz and Wendt agreed that the international system is anarchic, meaning that there is no dominant authority, all states are considered sovereign and in juridical terms equal and non-existent or weak institutions. Yet, they disagree about what the definition of anarchy is, what constitutes anarchy, what about anarchy causes states to act in certain ways and if anarchy can even be overcome in a meaningful way. On the other hand, Kang and Gilpin argue that the international system is “hierarchic” and not anarchic. This short review essay will first, examine why many scholars of international politics view the international system as disorder, while others view the international system as one characterized by order, secondly what is cooperation in international system and why do states engage or not engage in cooperative behavior by the realists and liberals point of view and last, the main characteristics of the international system. A system is composed of a…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperialism Vs Realism

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The international system is like a food chain of predators; everyone has a taste for blood, but very few countries have the ability to "eat". If you are not the hegemon, you are prospective prey to someone else. What type of predator a state is depends of if the are realist or neorealist. Realists believe the primary objective of the state is to survive.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although the leaders of the Bolshevik revolution aimed to create a communist society in the USSR based on Marxism, however due to several reasons, the society (and state) they formed was different from the one envisioned by Marx. Marxism, in essence, is Karl Marx’s political ideology whereas communism is a society (and a political system) based on that ideology. The research paper explores this thesis by a comparative analysis of Marxist doctrines and its application as carried out by Lenin and his successors in the ‘Socialist’ USSR. In the above context, central questions that would be addressed would revolve around whether the communists were able to establish a classless society in the Soviet Union? Was the formation of a communist society…

    • 2903 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Communism Vs Communism

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Undoubtedly after World War II, two countries emerged as world super powers. The Soviet Union and United States were holding plastic knives to the throats of themselves, each other, and the rest of the Eastern hemisphere. Little did the rest of the world know those plastic knives were coated in arsenic that could contaminate the entire Earth if one were cut, or one missile fired. These countries and their brutish displays of wealth and power stood for the ideals of Communism and Democracy respectively. However, one ideal came out of the stranglehold victorious.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utopia by Thomas Moore and The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx reveal insight from the perception of two men of what the perfect world would consist of along with how it would function. Utopianism is a much more imaginative condition whereas Marx ideas could be considered more applicable. These are good concepts to consider and study, however it is reasonable to claim that there will never be a truly perfect society. The purpose of this paper will be to go more in depth into both books and gain better understanding on where the authors were coming from with these what seem to be absurd ideas. Marxism and Utopianism share many unique ideas that while carefully thought through, will never result in a perfect society.…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theories can help simplify the complexities of international politics. Theories help create an abstract understanding and an explanation of why and how the states behave. Realism, liberalism, and constructivism all have different perspectives of how the states should operate, but not one of those theories is more accurate than the other or explains the real world problems. I organized this paper based on the most famous theories: realism,liberalism, and constructivism along with their core perceptions of the world and their criticism following regards them through other lenses.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction This essay wishes to examine to what extent are planners utopian and how has utopian planning varied over time. It will begin by taking a look at the development of utopianism over time. Next, it will examine how utopian thinking was brought into planning and its social background. Then, by looking at how utopian ideas were developed and manifested in cities, readers can have a clear understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of utopian planning and how it has influenced our society. Finally, the essay will discuss about the major critiques of utopian planning.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 19th century, some powerful European countries expanded their countries to new territories, known as "colonialism." Both colonialism and contemporary globalization can lead to inter-state relations. In this article, I will compare Colonialism and contemporary globalization. Colonialism is defined as a policy or practice of "full or partial political control over another country, its occupation of settlers and its economic exploitation". Globalization means the integration of economy, finance, trade and communication on a global scale.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Oxford Dictionary online (2016) defines international relations as “the way in which two or more nations interact with and regard each other, especially in the context of political, economic, or cultural relationships”. However, what to include and exclude in the definition is a controversial topic and there is still no decisive answer of what international relations means. Scholars have been suggesting various definitions, for instance, one source stated that International Relations (i.e. the study of international relations, referred to as IR) is defined as “the study of interactions among the various actors that participate in international politics including states, international organizations…and individuals” (Mingst et al. 2014: 2)…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays