Communism And Communism Analysis

Decent Essays
Marx uses his labor theory, which involves the capitalist profit analysis of exploiting the proletariat, to make the economic analysis of capitalism. Besides this, he complains that the intellectual creations of individual nations become common property, and national one-sidedness and limitations are no longer possible. He believes that communism will create a classless society and equality of all individuals and explains the first goals of the communist parties: formation of the proletariat into a class level, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat, and not the abolition of property in general, but the abolition of bourgeois property.
In this regard, communism was formed in the Western world before
…show more content…
Whilst communism and capitalism are the economic systems in one point, the main difference is the control of production instruments; whether to have collective ownership or private property. In capitalism, owning the instruments of production is free, but it is also very difficult to maintain this ownership because of the constraints to generate revenue in the perfect competition. Whereas production instruments are shared equally in the communist system, so each individual has the right to use common goods and services. Of course, it is not clear the level of sharing equally. Briefly, communism calls for an economic order of sharing the ownership. By focusing on the idea of sharing equally, communism overlooks the deeper problem of the movement. The point is that the development of the country is not feasible while the government is managing the economy. In order to survive, competition is necessary to stay in the capitalist markets. However, in communism, scientific development occurs by the government 's jostle. For example, the volume of production depends on operating a faster machine for a textile company. Technological developments happen inherently regarding requirements of the sector. In communist countries, the machines belong to the state and the people who work on the same machines for years. Aside from Cuba, China, and North Korea, dozens of communist states …show more content…
My general analysis of the bourgeoisie is about the capitalists’ selfishness and their destruction of social welfare. The bourgeois exempts himself from the disaster of suffering people, so the bourgeois does not have to take responsibility of it. Most of the old national industries have been destroyed and are still being destroyed. Today, this class still protects itself due to the continuation of capitalism; it is unfinished, and will never be finished. Of course, many will probably disagree with this assertion. They are right as well because capitalism focuses on personal freedom and supports opportunities for equalization in capitalist countries; anyone can trade and produce with enough capital accumulation. Furthermore, private law and individual rights are in the foreground. On the one hand, I agree with Marx that communism brings a cosmopolitan production and consumption character to exploit the world market. On the other hand, I want to emphasize that the criticism of capitalism doesn`t mean that communism has to be offered. If capitalism is wrong, communism cannot be verified instead of capitalism because the opposite of false (the anti-thesis) is not always true. Moreover, just like postmodern ideologues claim, the Marxist theory stays in the frame of the centralized state control that has the constraints of a dialectic hierarchy. Allegations have solid

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    He argued that production forces people to exchange good and services, not individuals. Economic relations are beyond the individual in the sense that they grow and change separate to the interconnections of individuals, And these relationships have power over the individual. Individuals aren’t independents, they just appear so when separated from society. But, as Marx states, they can’t be separated from society because in capitalism, social classes shaped the individual and how they interacted with production and each other. Much like liberal democracy, Marx believed that individual rights were harmful to the proletariat because they favored the landowning bourgeoisie over the proletariat.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Others claim it is unjust to the working class, and others accept its outcome. The main question that will be discussed is whether capitalism can be just, and is socialism better. Capitalism is defined as an economic and political system in which a country 's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state. Capitalism is a free market where the people can sell, and trade without having external interference. In theory, it all sounds great, but in practice it doesn’t always turn out that well.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It pits the wealthy against the lower class of society. This conflict is not the product of greed, or the lack of compassion for the poor, but it is the product of capitalism in Marx 's view. Marx contends that a capitalist society can only lead to social inequality by reason of, it is designed to promote individualism . The proletariat sells their labor to the bourgeoisie, or the capitalist, for money, but the capitalist owns the machines, the building, the product, and everything else associated with making the product. The goal of the capitalist is to achieve the largest profit margin as possible.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This leads Marx to suggest a communist form of government where there will be no private ownership. The change to Marx’s last stage is not one in object but in rational. Marx still advocates for a communist state, but he changes his view on private property. Marx now view production as the source of class relations. It is because of the bourgeoise owning the means of production that labor is exploited, and surplus is extracted.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Capitalist theory reinforces the belief that the government should have little to no regulation of businesses. This encourages commercialism and private enterprise, a no holds barred approach to business operations. Communist theory takes the stance that a lack of government regulation contributes to abuses of power and arbitrary working conditions for the proletariat. Both capitalism and communism have their pros and cons. Capitalism engenders economic freedom, growth and efficiency, however, it also creates a monopoly of power and marked class divisions.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marxism requires “Centralization of credits in the hands of the state” (387). In other words, Karl Marx believes in the establishment of an equal class in that wealth is shared and balanced among all citizens; essentially diminishing class itself. Condorcet does not stretch that far in discussing equality; he believes each person should work for their own money (193). In addition, Antoine Nicolas de Condorcet believes everyone should start with a clean slate, meaning that there is equal opportunity for each individual to define their own status. Also, due to complete communism, Marxism believes “Political power, properly so called, is merely the organized power of one class for oppressing another” (388).…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx believes that conflict is necessary (p. 500). He further explains those in the bottom of the capitalist society should unite to over throw the exploitative system of capitalism in order to achieve the ideal classless society. He states without conflict the bourgeoisie, top of the economic class, will not willingly give up their power. While Hobbes argues life is better with no conflict, therefore, even if the sovereign is unjust life without a sovereign is much worse (p. 17). Hence, Hobbes believes there is no need to use conflict against the sovereign or in general because the result of conflict is much too…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx Vs Adam Smith

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages

    He explains, ‘accumulation of wealth at one pole is, therefore, at the same time accumulation of misery, agony of toil, slavery, ignorance, brutality, mental degradation, at the opposite pole’ (History of Socialism, Laidler 1968 p.152). Another flaw in capitalism is its chaotic nature. Capitalism is seen as chaotic and unpredictable as it is controlled through a free market and government cannot control every aspect of the economy. Due to this, Marx makes the argument that socialism is a better system as every aspect of the economy is controlled by the government and therefore little to no crises will occur. He mentions on numerous occasions that capitalism is prone to destroy itself and the working class will revolt and over through the capitalist which will be followed by a new socialist economic system.…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He stated, “The free market punishes irresponsibility. Government rewards it.” This clearly illustrates that he, like Friedman, is strongly in favour of capitalism, and the ideas that it brings to society. Typically a market economy has strict societal class divisions, and those who work hard for what they earn are normally put into the middle and upper class. Browne is in agreeance with this theory because he believes that those working for their profits should be rewarded for their actions. On the contrary, he thinks that those who fall into the lower class should not be rewarded by the government through means of welfare programs.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is the foremost justification for why capitalism is despised by many and not applied as it should be. The market has to function on its own for it to reflect all the perks of capitalism, as the name evidently indicate— free market. Trying to regulate price, to control and restrict companies, to tax unfairly are all signs of a corrupt capitalist government. Ironically, these actions may appear acceptable and reasonable but they are not. Nonetheless, a government’s task should be anything but these.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics