When politeness indicators were given in the email, the response was more polite than when they were not in the message. Differences among people including age, gender, and frequency of the use of email were found to not influence the politeness used in messages. The result also showed that it is easy to express politeness in email, just as it is in verbal communication with a social cue. It is proved to coincide with Communication Accommodation Theory; people converge with their politeness in emails. It is stated in the discussion section of the report that more research is needed and so is a bigger sample of people in order to further the
When politeness indicators were given in the email, the response was more polite than when they were not in the message. Differences among people including age, gender, and frequency of the use of email were found to not influence the politeness used in messages. The result also showed that it is easy to express politeness in email, just as it is in verbal communication with a social cue. It is proved to coincide with Communication Accommodation Theory; people converge with their politeness in emails. It is stated in the discussion section of the report that more research is needed and so is a bigger sample of people in order to further the