Common Sense Principle In The Workplace

Decent Essays
After reading this case, I agree with the ruling. After returning back to work, the employees did not like change. The change will not help him or the employers around him. The best thing to do is to use the “Common Sense Principle” that most companies fail to use after threats. The society is being conscious about situations like this because of a lot of massive warned thought out attacks such as this case. Common sense plays a big role in safety.

According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, it does not protect this employee. Due to the employee giving an imminence of a potential harm against two employers, the federal agency cannot enforce civil rights law against this workplace discrimination.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Allen Lopez Case Summary

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case of petitioner ExtremeNet versus respondent Allen Lopez, this case occurred in the State of Georgia in which At Will Employment Law applies. Respondent is making a counter claim. The respondent had worked for the petitioner for seven years in a middle-management position. The respondent found the position rewarding and was well paid. The petitioner struggled to manage the effects of an economic downward spiral; therefore, some employees were laid off and new personnel policies were implemented.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    New Mexico Case Study

    • 5213 Words
    • 21 Pages

    In such cases, courts have applied a “totality of circumstances” or “last straw” test to determine whether, taken together, this series of incidents constitutes misconduct sufficient to disqualify the claimant from receiving benefits. Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc., 89 N.M. 575, 555 P.2d 696 (1976). Rodman recognizes the “last straw” doctrine, but contends that the district court erred in applying the rule in this case because her infractions of February 15 were the result of acts of third parties over whom she had no physical or legal control. Appellant contends that she may not be denied unemployment benefits where the “last straw” which led to her termination was not willful or intentional, especially where, under the employer’s personnel policy, she could not have been discharged at all before this final…

    • 5213 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rozelle Rule Case Summary

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After reading about the case, I felt the ruling was a correct one because looking at the ruling, it says that the non-statutory labor exemption…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Basically, what this asks is was the employee given any knowledge that doing this action was forbidden? This could be mentioned in the employee handbook or in some form of writing. In this case, Charlene was not given a forewarning of her action. After the incident occurred, she was just told that the company was not happy with her. The second question that should be considered is was the company’s rule reasonably related to the 1)efficient and safe operation of the organization’s business and 2) the performance that the company expects of the employee?…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Logan tells her boss, Diego, told her and five other women that they were his top employees, but none of them would be offered promotional opportunities with the company. When asked for an explanation, Diego told them that some of his traditional clients told him they would refuse to work with women, and if any of those clients decided to take their work to another vendor, he would suffer a significant economic loss. Issues 1. Could the client sue the company for sexual discrimination. 2.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, no employer can discriminate against an employee based upon race, color, religion, sex or national origin. When Shaun is demoted by Montgomery ’s it was because the customer (Phil) made a false complaint about her supposedly saying a racial slur towards Phil. Thus under federal law Shaun was not discriminated against because the law only applies to undesirable employer actions against employees based upon Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which is race, color, sexual orientation, national origin and so on. Shaun being demoted was not based on those examples; it was based on her alleged behavior.…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act brought about two chief concepts of illegal discrimination. These concepts are disparate treatment and disparate impact (Harper, 2016). This section of the Civil Rights Act makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an employee based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Individuals cannot lawfully be denied employment opportunities or have their employment adversely affected merely because of their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin (EEOC Website, 2016).…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In early September, Twenty-First Century Fox settled with past host of a news show on Fox New, Gretchen Carlson, for sexual harassment. She was awarded twenty million dollars for her being a victim of long time CEO Roger Ailes. Roger Ailes was eventually fired from running the Fox News company. In her lawsuit, Carlson said her contract wasn 't renewed after she “refused to sleep” with Ailes and reported "severe and pervasive sexual harassment” at her workplace. (Yu, 2016)…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    An employer's job is to make sure all of their employees are protected and to provide a safe work environment. Janet's employer could have made reasonable accommodations to avoid environmental triggers of seizures such as installing anti-glare filters, reducing the brightness, or a training on how to handle someone who has seizures. Janet's collogues started to avoid her out of fear and lack of their knowledge of epilepsy. The employer should have conducted a training program or send out information on how to take care of someone who is suffering from medical conditions such as seizures right in front of them, without violating Janet's privacy. The lack of sensitivity training towards coworkers lead to the physician who is knowledgeable of epilepsy, to ask the administration to fire her.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The logical fallacy that I have seen in my work since I started working this month is “Either/or Reasoning”. I see this everyday at my job, they are offering one or two choices to the employee, when there are more choices to choose. I think that people need to think out of the box sometimes in life and offer more than two…

    • 63 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Paine Common Sense Discussion Question: 1. According, to Paine, what is the difference between society and government? Society is the wants of the people; it is considered what is good. Government on the other hand is the institution used to harbor the evil of the people.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. NLRB, 535 U.S. 137, 122 S. Ct. 1275, 152 L.Ed.2d 271 (2002), Mr. Castro was fired for his organizing activities, which he was unlawfully terminated (“Undocumented Workers”., n.d.). “The National Labor Relations Board, the agency that administers the NLRA, ordered the employer to cease and desist, to post a notice that it had violated the law and to reinstate Mr. Castro, and to provide him with back pay for the time he was not working because he had been illegally fired (“Undocumented Workers”. , n.d., p. 5.) .”…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I, professional Professionalism is a huge word composed of small acts. It’s not been a long time since I graduated from college and just 2 months ago when I signed my contract to this company. There are lots of changes since then. I was the “I-don’t-care-as-long-as-I-passed” person, the rule unto myself, I am the “go have fun as there is time”, I am just representing “me”. I was overwhelmed when I got hired by this company, I mean, first job ever!…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics have a major impact in the way companies hire and fire employees. Today, more than ever, companies are susceptible to lawsuits for a myriad of reasons from wrongful termination to policy violation to violating equal employment rights. Many of these organizations spend years entangled in the legal system and accumulate thousands of dollars in legal fees. More often than not, many are bankrupt as a result while others downsize and pay out millions to victims.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wal-Mart a multibillion corporation is one of the largest companies in the US, employing about 1% of the American workforce. By offering some of the lowest prices on the market they quickly took over the business. But as Wal-Mart grew so did the grievances against it. In the documentary “Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price” by Robert Greenwald the effects of the business on its employees and the communities they serve was investigated, the harm the corporation brings to its workers through the world and communities is much higher than the benefits of lower prices.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays