Home Page
Common Law: Attorney-Client Privilege

Common Law: Attorney-Client Privilege

Improved Essays

Show More

Evidentiary privileges shall be governed by the principles of the common law in the light of reason and experience. It is aimed to encourage full and frank communication between attorneys and their clients to promote public interest in the observance of law and administration of justice.
Attorney-Client Privilege
It is the Client’s right privilege to refuse to disclose or prevent others from disclosing confidential communications between the client and the attorney.

Here, Carolyn (C) hires an account and tells him at their first meeting that she has not filed tax returns for the past 5 years because she had no time to do it. Her accountant then advised her that she should consult with her attorney about it. Since she disclosed her failure

Related Documents

Improved Essays
Frank Armani's Privileged Information
- 1053 Words
- 4 Pages
Frank Armani's Privileged Information

Privileged Information is an enticing and different book because the reader takes a journey into their first criminal case, at the same time as the main character, Frank Armani. Armani, a lawyer who regularly handled liability work, was burdened with the task of taking on a criminal case. His former client, Robert Garrow was being charged with murder charges and claims of being tied to other rapes and murders also. The book takes us through the capture of Garrow, the pretrial discussions and work, the trial, and the aftermath of the trial. Ultimately, Garrow is found guilty and Armani’s attempts for insanity charges are put to rest, sending Garrow to jail.…
- 1053 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Decent Essays
Summary Of In Re Gault
- 170 Words
- 1 Pages
Summary Of In Re Gault

These rights include the notice of the charges, the right to have counsel, the right to confront and question witnesses, and the protection from self-incrimination. At the close of the…
- 170 Words
- 1 Pages
Decent Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Ambiguity Of Scots Law Essay
- 1066 Words
- 4 Pages
Ambiguity Of Scots Law Essay

here are two recognised standards of proof in Scots law. The first is beyond reasonable doubt, which is usually in criminal cases. The second is on the balance of probabilities which arises mostly in the civil context. This would suggest that the law on the standard of proof is straightforward. However ambiguity arises in the argument that there is or that there should be a third standard.…
- 1066 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Escondido Trafalgar Case Study
- 513 Words
- 3 Pages
Escondido Trafalgar Case Study

This Stipulation re Confidentiality and Protective Order is entered into by Blast Enterprises, Inc., Stephen Brody, and Trudy Brody (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and Escondido Trafalgar, LLC (“Defendant”), by and through their attorneys of record. In this Agreement, Plaintiffs and Defendants are also referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.” IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties as follows: 1. The documents relating to settlement negotiations between Escondido Trafalgar and tenants or former tenants of Trafalgar Square shopping center produced informally or formally in the captioned litigation (the “Action”), by the Parties or by a third party, may be marked “CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY”…
- 513 Words
- 3 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
An Analysis Of Reasonable Religious Disagreements By Richard Feldman
- 797 Words
- 4 Pages
An Analysis Of Reasonable Religious Disagreements By Richard Feldman

The matter of contention present with respect to the disclosure of evidence is conspicuous when considering the notion of full disclosure itself. The concept of fully sharing evidence…
- 797 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Superior Essays
The Ethical Dilemmas Of Defense Attorney
- 3179 Words
- 13 Pages
The Ethical Dilemmas Of Defense Attorney

Ethical Dilemmas of Defense Attorneys Defense attorneys have to face the ethical dilemma every day of whether or not to defend their client as well as whether or not to maintain that lawyer-client privilege. The lawyer-client privilege provides a security blanket for the client. Under this privilege, the client can almost tell the lawyer just about anything in confidence and not have to worry about the possible fear of being judged or incriminating themselves. A defense attorney serves as a guide that you can basically tell all your deepest darkest secrets to. However, some of those secrets may not always be able to be kept confidential, so be careful about what secrets you share.…
- 3179 Words
- 13 Pages
Superior Essays

Read More
Superior Essays
My Cousin Vinny Analysis
- 1043 Words
- 5 Pages
My Cousin Vinny Analysis

However, Vinny accredited this to his superb persuasion skills rather than the fact that it is required for the opposing party to share relevant facts concerning the case. This is due to the 1963 Supreme Court Case Brady v. Maryland, which ruled that Due Process requires defendants to be given any exculpatory information, commonly referred to an “open file” policy. Discovery refers to the entitlement each party has to receive information that the opposing side has in possession, thus preventing surprises in court. An example of this was when the D.A. called his own expert witness in automobiles and Vinny was not aware, yet the judge allowed it. Additionally, My Cousin Vinny was accurate in representing both the prosecution and defense's closing arguments, which refers to the fact that no more evidence will be presented because both sides have finished arguing.…
- 1043 Words
- 5 Pages
Superior Essays

Read More
Superior Essays
Error And Criminal Law: Film Analysis
- 1496 Words
- 6 Pages
Error And Criminal Law: Film Analysis

Throughout Truth, Error, and Criminal Law Larry Laudan presents aspects of the law that he believes should be changed to maintain an epistemic goal of the criminal justice system. He argues that the court system frequently maintains rules that seek to distribute the verdicts so that we have less false convictions than false acquittals whether these rules will aid the system in seeking the truth or not. One of the primary principles currently in place that he believes should be amended is the “Silent Defendant” rule, as he calls it, which allows the defendant the choice of whether to testify or not, and their choice to not testify cannot cause negative inferences from the jury. He believes that allowing the defendant not to speak as well as…
- 1496 Words
- 6 Pages
Superior Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Standard Of Proof Doubt
- 206 Words
- 1 Pages
Standard Of Proof Doubt

The standard of proof reasonable doubt is recognized as a constitutional requirement after In re Winship. Although the standard does not appear within the text of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has found that the due process guarantees of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments "protect the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged." Specifically, it provides that in a criminal case, the defendant is to be given the benefit of a reasonable doubt, that is, if such a doubt exists. Under this doctrine, if in the opinion of the trier of the facts, the proof offered as to the guilt of the defendant is also susceptible of a finding of innocence,…
- 206 Words
- 1 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Jury Trial Advantages And Disadvantages
- 2129 Words
- 9 Pages
Jury Trial Advantages And Disadvantages

| | | |No enquiry allowed into jury deliberations after verdict, even if juror | |Section 51 Criminal Justice & Public Order Act 1994 creates offence |alleges racial or any other type of bias or wrongdoing by the jury. | |to intimidate or threaten to harm a juror. | | |Prosecution and defence "challenges" correct the problems caused by |Jury vetting is against the principle of random selection. | |random selection.…
- 2129 Words
- 9 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Superior Essays
Importance Of Due Process In Criminal Justice
- 1926 Words
- 8 Pages
Importance Of Due Process In Criminal Justice

The Importance of Due Process in the Criminal Justice System Andy X. Hernandez Troy University Abstract Criminal justice is not just about going after criminals and putting them behind bars. There is more to it than just locking one up. There are certain checks and balances and rights that defendants have before, during, and after their trial. We have learned that each defendant is afforded protection by the Bill of Rights such as right to a speedy trial (Sixth Amendment) and the Fifth Amendment: the right that no one shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.”…
- 1926 Words
- 8 Pages
Superior Essays

Read More
Superior Essays
Health And Social Care Level 3 Unit 10 M1
- 1935 Words
- 8 Pages
Health And Social Care Level 3 Unit 10 M1

M1: describe how practitioners should apply values of care in a health and social care service. Introduction Maintaining confidentiality Health and social care setting Confidentiality is keeping a confidence between the client and the practitioner which is an important part of good health care service.…
- 1935 Words
- 8 Pages
Superior Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
A Murder On A Sunday Morning Summary
- 550 Words
- 3 Pages
A Murder On A Sunday Morning Summary

A Murder on a Sunday Morning is a documentary that follows the trial of 15 year old Brenton Butler in order to prove his innocence by displaying the ethical issues behind the case. Brenton Butler was accused for murdering Maryann Stephens who was walking with her husband to their hotel room after breakfast, when he supposedly approached Ms. Stephens and demanded for her purse at gun point, then proceeded to lift his gun and shot her in the face, leaving Mr. Stephens as the eye witness to the crime. When questioned by detectives, Mr. Stephens describes the shooter to be a tall, skinny built black male wearing a dark shirt and shorts, and a fishing hat. Police who were surveying the area spotted Brenton Butler who coincidentally fit the description. Brenton, who was on his way to apply at a local Blockbuster store was told by police of a murder that happened nearby, and was asked to go to the police station to answer questions about what he may have seen; however, the 15 year old ended up in the back of a…
- 550 Words
- 3 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Superior Essays
Difference Between Privacy, Privilege And Informed Consent
- 1730 Words
- 7 Pages
Difference Between Privacy, Privilege And Informed Consent

Confidentiality, Privacy, Privilege, Informed Consent a. Define the terms privacy, privilege, confidentiality, and informed consent. How do they differ from each other? Privacy, confidentiality, informed consent and privilege all differ from each other in some way. Privacy is the condition of being free from unauthorized intrusion, confidentiality is allowing people to know something on a need to know basis.…
- 1730 Words
- 7 Pages
Superior Essays

Read More
Great Essays
The Importance Of Party Choice Of Law
- 1521 Words
- 7 Pages
The Importance Of Party Choice Of Law

Authored by Eshita Sand, a 4th year student of B.A.LL.B(Hons.)- with Specialization in Energy Laws at College of Legal Studies, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun. According to recital 11, Rome I Regulation, ‘The parties’ freedom to choose the applicable law should be one of the cornerstones of the system of conflict-of-law rules in matters of contractual obligations’. The ambit of party autonomy is seriously restricted, on the other hand, in the context of contracts other than B to B. For three categories of reputedly weaker parties (consumers, employees and insurance policy holders) party choice of law is allowed only to increase the protection provided under the law of the weaker party’s habitual residence (or place…
- 1521 Words
- 7 Pages
Great Essays

Read More

Related Topics