Comment [KLC1]: What do you mean? Animals got sick then their prolificacy decreases and died .
Comment [KLC2]: What is the message here? Like your message : Animals got sick and died.
Comment [KLC3]: Too much what? The industry chemical food.
Comment [KLC4]: We do or we do not? Ops . This is by the time for we do not have and then have a little . After then , have a lot like now . But I trust there will be more in the future .
Comment [KLC5]: What is this paragraph for? For nothing . Now I read this paragraph back , this look like meaningless .
Comment [KLC6]: What comparison are you making? It is not logical.
Our body like a backpack . So I do not use this comparison .
Comment [KLC7]: Same, a wrong analogy. Same , do not use this . …show more content…
Yes !
Comment [KLC12]: The sentence is not coherent.
I think there is missing link . Because the food today is cleaner than the past . And then no more bacteria to challenge our immunity , our immunity missing competition . No competition , no advancement . After then , our immunity lazy then got weak cause no competition .
Comment [KLC13]: Why would we degenerate? Cause by the food today is cleaner , then no bacteria challenge to our immunity to advancement . So we degenerate .
Comment [KLC14]: Did you change? Well . I do not know . But I always got sick and illness . But this should be not by the food problem .
Comment [KLC15]: Up level? Yes , when you play some game have a level system . Up level is mean be stronger than the past .
Comment [KLC16]: What are “that” and “it”? This is your question . "That" is develop more industry chemical food and "it" is the side effect of industry chemical food .
Comment [KLC17]: Not a direct relationship. Yes , missing link again ,
Comment [KLC18]: In complete sentence.
The complete sentence should be : About this question "Should we go with that and let it continue , or have more people fed well , and let them develop allergy ? " , I can not get this question and can not understand what is the question about
Comment [KLC2]: What is the message here? Like your message : Animals got sick and died.
Comment [KLC3]: Too much what? The industry chemical food.
Comment [KLC4]: We do or we do not? Ops . This is by the time for we do not have and then have a little . After then , have a lot like now . But I trust there will be more in the future .
Comment [KLC5]: What is this paragraph for? For nothing . Now I read this paragraph back , this look like meaningless .
Comment [KLC6]: What comparison are you making? It is not logical.
Our body like a backpack . So I do not use this comparison .
Comment [KLC7]: Same, a wrong analogy. Same , do not use this . …show more content…
Yes !
Comment [KLC12]: The sentence is not coherent.
I think there is missing link . Because the food today is cleaner than the past . And then no more bacteria to challenge our immunity , our immunity missing competition . No competition , no advancement . After then , our immunity lazy then got weak cause no competition .
Comment [KLC13]: Why would we degenerate? Cause by the food today is cleaner , then no bacteria challenge to our immunity to advancement . So we degenerate .
Comment [KLC14]: Did you change? Well . I do not know . But I always got sick and illness . But this should be not by the food problem .
Comment [KLC15]: Up level? Yes , when you play some game have a level system . Up level is mean be stronger than the past .
Comment [KLC16]: What are “that” and “it”? This is your question . "That" is develop more industry chemical food and "it" is the side effect of industry chemical food .
Comment [KLC17]: Not a direct relationship. Yes , missing link again ,
Comment [KLC18]: In complete sentence.
The complete sentence should be : About this question "Should we go with that and let it continue , or have more people fed well , and let them develop allergy ? " , I can not get this question and can not understand what is the question about