The debate consisted of two sides. One side agreeing to what Kaepernick did. The other completely disagreeing to his stance. Both sides shared great points in which, to why they didn’t agree. One group stated that Kaepernick used the 1st amendment to its full advantage. They also believed his protest was a peaceful meaning. The other called it disrespectful and unethical. They also stated that Kaepernick gets paid to play football not
The debate consisted of two sides. One side agreeing to what Kaepernick did. The other completely disagreeing to his stance. Both sides shared great points in which, to why they didn’t agree. One group stated that Kaepernick used the 1st amendment to its full advantage. They also believed his protest was a peaceful meaning. The other called it disrespectful and unethical. They also stated that Kaepernick gets paid to play football not