Cohabitation: Social Norms

Improved Essays
The essay touches on the marriage perception that once seemed to be a social norm, but it seems to be converting to the concept of cohabiting as time progresses. From the essay, the U.S. Census Bureau claims that one million people were cohabiting, but the numbers increased dramatically since then. Currently, nearly half the population in the United States from 35-39 years of age are cohabiting according the U.S. Census Bureau. Nowadays, cohabitation is normal and there are a plethora of reasons why. However, there are many problems that come with cohabitation such as, an increase in questioning your partner’s faithfulness and abuse. The essay claims that cohabitation is similar to a “trial marriage” and it can be classified as redundant. …show more content…
Also, many people do not believe that marriage will last long and simply living with your partner can bring more happiness. However, others may want to cohabit so they can learn about their partner and see what it is like to live with them before being married.

Surprisingly, it is claimed that women in cohabitating relationships have a higher possibility of being abused and suffer. On the contrary, if the couple is married, they will have a healthier relationship emotionally and physically. Possibly, marriage can create the healthy relationships between two people especially if their promised vows are genuine and they can be themselves around each other. Also, research claims that couples that live together for a while and then get married will have a higher percentage of getting divorced than people who do not cohabit before getting married. In the essay, it is claimed that many couples that cohabit have children and majority will end up having stepfamilies. It is claimed that 75% of these families will have separate families while only a third of children who have married parents will go through similar

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The New Mating Market, we see divorce as a major killer in every aspect of life; finances are affected, children are emotionally torn, social lives are left on the fence, and family members are in limbo. Porter informs the audience “Marriage is also a form of insurance. Families with two sources of income are more financially secure than one and are thus more willing to take financial risks”(268). Aside from the lovely…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marriage-Farris Stephanie Coontz wrote a bold statement “The notion that marriage is an impediment to commitments to the larger community. This sentence extracted from her essay the “Five Myths About Marriage. In her essay Coontz, does make a plausible case that some divorced families do enjoy a wholesome existence. Although, marriage is more than a liability. Moreover, marriage is the combination of two very different perspectives; one female and one male perspective which empowers and strengthens the union of family through modeling.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ron L. Deal also writes in this book that cohabitation increases the chances of divorce. A study by Brown, Sanchez, Nock and Wright (2006) indicates that it has no effects on marital quality. They stretched out former exploration on the relationship between premarital cohabitation and marital results by researching whether contract marriage, which involves more stringent necessities for separation, minimizes the harmful impacts of cohabitation on consequent marital quality and soundness. Utilizing a one of a kind longitudinal information set of agreement and standard love bird couples in Louisiana, they found that pledge marriage does not change the impacts of premarital cohabitation on marital precariousness, joy, reliance, or separation for…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For Better, For Worse Stephanie Coontz wrote in the article “For better, For Worse: Marriage Means Something Different Now”, that marriage has changed recently, the values are not the same as they were in the 1960’s. When marriage was a status symbol only in the 1960’s, there were fewer problems. Because of changes to divorce laws, it is now easier to divorce than ever before, changing family dynamics as well as society. I believe that if a person makes a life long commitment, they should be held to their commitment, as they did in the 1960’s.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this documentary, The Way We Never Were, Stephanie Coontz discusses the myths and realities of marriage and families in history as well as in present day and examines the consequences of the development of marriage throughout history. Beginning with the single parent families the myth is that single parent families are only a new trend when really they’ve been around for centuries. Coontz says that at the beginning of the 19th century one parent households were common because of the extremely high death rate that plagued the nations. Similarly, step families which one would think is a recent idea has also been around since the 19th century due to the high death rate which increased the chances of remarrying and combining families. The myth that…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Popenoe

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stating, “As an institution, marriage has lost much of its legal, social, economic, and religious meaning and authority.” The authors believe that marriage no longer has the same prestige that it once had and instead the meaning of marriage itself has been redefined. Popenoe and Whitehead present the article in a very logical way, explaining how ideas about marriage have evolved and using statistics to support their claims. Proposing that “ It is a sign of the times that the overwhelming majority (94%) of never married singles in our survey agreed that ‘when you marry, you want your spouse to be your soul mate, first and foremost.’” They go on to explain that this is a new…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prager explains that marriage changes the point of view in person’s life. As Prager says only with marriage will your man’s or woman’s family ever become your family, which arguments I feel the strongest one. Likewise, marriage play key role in forming of your family, and marriage doesn’t only change couple’s life, but it changes couple’s loved once life, too. However, when you live in a relationship you don’t really think about each other and family, but when you marry a person you expect to have kids, have a house and have a family one day in the future. Also, Marriage is not just a certificate of being together, but it is something which connects two people emotionally.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, I think the argument presented by the author is unsuccessful and has really drawn the readers into false dilemmas, i.e. consider the author's assertion that, "…that there are merely two alternatives to consider when there are essentially more than two"2, in this case, several other reasons (Esteve, Albert & Ron 280). Several couples are having similar sex relationships and are not permitted to get married in most states in the United States of America3. Consequently, some partners cannot afford the financial obligations that come with marriage while others have personal reasons concerning having been opted just to remain cohabiting and not getting married (Vaughn 484). However, the authors state merely three reasons why couples choose to engage in trial marriage through cohabitation thus opting to delay in getting married, i.e., due to abundant lust in the society, observing several marriages getting broken make it seem precarious to some people and finally, due to lost confidence in precisely judging durable marriages. Notably, I consider that the author has left out several reasons or possibilities that usually make couples to cohabitate without getting…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marriage which is widely defined as the legally or formally recognized union of two people as partners in a personal relationship has been an integral part of the world. It has also been channel where individuals come together and legitimately demonstrate and show care and affection towards each other. This has made marriage a form of institution that provides the platform for people to come together for the purpose of love, goals, relationships etc. In his writing on “The Deinstitutionalization of American Marriage” Cherlin explains that marriage is an institution that defines partner’s behavior.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The process of a marriage or divorce will never be easily explained. How do these people make a marriage work, how have they been successful or failed? Marriage has been studied over the years and these two authors give insight into how it has changed. Stephanie Coontz, author of “Origins of Modern Divorce'', writes about how marriage has changed in history. She talks about how marriage and divorce have changed, why people married, and why they divorced.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    4. Explain how cohabitation could create legal problems for couples: residence, money, property, insurance, health care, decision-making, and children. (8 points) Cohabitating can be both beneficial and disadvantageous. Some couples may believe that cohabitation is a good way to test the waters before marriage.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis In her essay, “The Disestablishment of Marriage”, Stephanie Coontz guest columnist teacher at The Evergreen State College, illustrates the change of the standards of marriage “demanding different things from marriage then in the past” with the use of studies and data. Coontz shows the data on how the present day marriage has changed from are ancestor’s views of marriage. Coontz discuss how marriage is no longer the center institution that organizes people’s lives.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Therefore, it can be interpreted that in most cases, cohabitation is a trial process for marriage and it is clear that from 70 years ago till today, marriage is still the most popular norm. However, marriage is not the most certain and final step in starting a family. Instabilities like divorce have been bringing down the number of married couples drastically over the years; thereby changing family structures in the British society. Trends like cohabitation as opposed to marriage have led to an extension in the definition of family. These phenomena with their social, political and economic causes and effects have challenged Giddens’ definition and concept of a traditional family.…

    • 1785 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sociology Of Family Essay

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Marriage is suggested to be the most stable and secure environment for families to function normally. Marriage is not the only living arrangement for people. It is being more popular for adults to live alone, single parents, and unmarried partners. There are also multigenerational households where more than one generation lives together. There are people who delay marriage.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Divorce Reflection

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages

    CHAPTER – I INTRODUCTORY REFLECTIONS Marriage is the foundation on which the institution of family is built up. Family is the unit of society on which the super structure of entire society and stability of social institution would stand. A happy matrimonial life is undoubtedly the foundation for successful family system. On the contrary, the sick and disgruntled marital relation has their repercussion impact not merely upon the related spouses, their children.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays