Is Nuclear Energy safer to use than Coal Energy? Human beings use energy almost every day, everywhere, and at every time. This counts as one of the biggest necessities of life; we use to power our homes, towns, and cities. In order to create energy, a substance needs to be used to start the generation of energy, some of these resources include coal, water, etc. But one of the most overlooked energy producers tops the charts in safety and consistency is nuclear energy. When many humans hear the word “nuclear”, they immediately think of nuclear weapons, deadly radiation, and other harm uses of nuclear power. Even though those are some uses of nuclear power; however there is a more beneficial use of nuclear power. Nuclear energy ranks at the
…show more content…
Coal energy is the most popular energy producers in the world, because of its rapid production of energy is a small amount of time. However, like I said earlier, there are flaws that are impactful to the human population that can lead to mass deaths and environmental struggles. As a result of the deadly emissions of coal energy, and the enormous amounts of deaths associated with those emissions, it is clear that nuclear energy is much safer to use than coal energy. One of the quickest ways to produce energy is to burn coal, and that whole process is commonly known as coal energy. When coal is burned, there are colorless gases of chemical compounds that are released into the air. Some of the most common of these compounds include sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and toxic mercury. When sulfur dioxide is released into the air, it starts to condense with the moisture in …show more content…
With those emissions in the air, they can lead to many dangers to human beings; however we need oxygen and other healthy elements in the air to breathe. But with toxic chemicals like sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and toxic mercury compounds can cause many defects in the human body. “Paul Epstein of Harvard Medical School’s Center for Health and the Global Environment stated that the “ledger of .02 cents per kilowatt hour for mental disorders caused by mercury in coal-plant emissions.” Also “Paul Wilkinson from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, researched and discovered that European coal is responsible for .12 of the deaths are from accidents, 25 deaths from pollution and 225 cases of serious illness per terawatt hour of electricity generated. In comparison, nuclear causes .02 accidental deaths, .05 pollution deaths and .22 cases of illness “(Brown para. 17).You can clearly depict that the major cause of death of coal energy is by the emissions is the air. But also there are occupational deaths as well. It’s especially high in China, where three-fourths of electricity is generated by the burning of coal; and mining accidents kill about 6,000 people a year in China. Also, other occupational deaths by coal mines, oil rigs, and other power plants are counted but don’t come close to the deaths caused by emissions (Brown para.
Coal energy is the most popular energy producers in the world, because of its rapid production of energy is a small amount of time. However, like I said earlier, there are flaws that are impactful to the human population that can lead to mass deaths and environmental struggles. As a result of the deadly emissions of coal energy, and the enormous amounts of deaths associated with those emissions, it is clear that nuclear energy is much safer to use than coal energy. One of the quickest ways to produce energy is to burn coal, and that whole process is commonly known as coal energy. When coal is burned, there are colorless gases of chemical compounds that are released into the air. Some of the most common of these compounds include sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and toxic mercury. When sulfur dioxide is released into the air, it starts to condense with the moisture in …show more content…
With those emissions in the air, they can lead to many dangers to human beings; however we need oxygen and other healthy elements in the air to breathe. But with toxic chemicals like sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and toxic mercury compounds can cause many defects in the human body. “Paul Epstein of Harvard Medical School’s Center for Health and the Global Environment stated that the “ledger of .02 cents per kilowatt hour for mental disorders caused by mercury in coal-plant emissions.” Also “Paul Wilkinson from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, researched and discovered that European coal is responsible for .12 of the deaths are from accidents, 25 deaths from pollution and 225 cases of serious illness per terawatt hour of electricity generated. In comparison, nuclear causes .02 accidental deaths, .05 pollution deaths and .22 cases of illness “(Brown para. 17).You can clearly depict that the major cause of death of coal energy is by the emissions is the air. But also there are occupational deaths as well. It’s especially high in China, where three-fourths of electricity is generated by the burning of coal; and mining accidents kill about 6,000 people a year in China. Also, other occupational deaths by coal mines, oil rigs, and other power plants are counted but don’t come close to the deaths caused by emissions (Brown para.