Argumentative Essay: The Cloning Controversy

Improved Essays
Before I tell you my viewpoint you should get to understand the other side’s claim on the debate on Cloning. They say that it could be used to save lives and help those who cannot reproduce naturally. The possibilities of new advancements are endless. According to the scientists who helped provide information to the article “The Cloning Controversy” “Others said its benefits could range from duplicating embryos for in vitro fertilization to replacing a dying child.” This would help many parents who suffer loss or cannot reproduce effectively naturally have another chance to bring a new life into the world. Women only create so many eggs, the eggs they start with are the only ones they have, and it takes many eggs to have one successful birth …show more content…
Most of us will readily agree that it should be allowed and could prove to be useful. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of will it actually work, and be useful. Were as some are convinced that it will work, others maintain that it won’t. It takes away our own unique sense of individuality. I stand on the line of it won’t work and even if it does it shouldn’t be allowed. It’s basically stealing one 's identity. Most importantly, it defies nature preventing the genetic differences that occur within a species to take place allowing it to survive. In many cases like the one from the article “The Cloning Controversy” “Opponents called for a ban on human cloning research, arguing that cloning offers few benefits to science while requiring unacceptable risks and undermining our very concept of humanness.” Readers can clearly take away that our humanness comes from our natural births and our individuality. Who are we to take away that right to our uniqueness? We are also taking away our own natural ability to provide a better chance of survival by the genetic differences provided by sexual reproduction. Many arguments have been made in the past on why cloning is ethical, but in retrospect they are wrong. In this case the pro’s do not outweigh the con’s. Arguments have been made stating that cloning could save lives, but it would jeopardize many more than it would save the scientists from the article “The Cloning Debate. Should All Forms Of Human Cloning Be Banned?” State “Many experts say reproductive cloning is grossly unethical because it jeopardizes the health of would-be child clones. They note that efforts to clone sheep, pigs, goats and other animals yield few live births, and that many live-born mammal clones die within weeks or months because of abnormalities.” If humans were to reproduce through cloning we would have very little success and the children would not live for very long. Why

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Is Human Cloning Possible

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Instead of creating clones that have to experience the effects of the imperfections, scientists should focus more on improving the lives of people by using other ways that does not include ethics or does not cause harm to others. These scientists are making the clones suffer through unneeded complications. Head states in the article, “Should human cloning be banned?”, “Scientists generally agree that it would be irresponsible to clone a human being until cloning has been perfected, given that the cloned human would probably face serious, and ultimately terminal, health issues.” It is impetuous for scientists to continue cloning because the babies that were made are alive and have their own feelings. They should not be forced to live with health issues their entire life because of our imperfect experiments. Scientists only want to create clones in order to have better organ donors.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Proponents of the idea say that cloning could lead to more disease resistant plants, but, this very creation could cause lack of DNA diversity. So, cloning should not be allowed because because people are still very conflicted on the subject, also the cost of cloning is too extreme and, it would lack in DNA diversity. First of all, cloning is still very new to the world. Although cloning has been around since Dolly the Sheep, the whole world is still conflicted on the subject. Some feel that the cloning of embryos, is morally repugnant and may feel that the idea of cloning humans is “playing God” according to “What are the Pros and Cons of Cloning?” So, if too many people are conflicted based on a moral stance, it will create too much turmoil in the science community.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (From http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/cloning/cloningrisks/) If these health problems arise in human clones, it is easy to see the inhumanity of cloning. Some say that cloning is more beneficial than not. If you needed an organ or limb transplant but there was no donor, you would just chop one out of your clone! You could lose as many limbs as you want, as long as you continued to make clones. Some women might want to have babies, but wouldn’t be able to.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You can put rules and regulations around cloning but you cannot stop this from getting into the wrong hands and someone using it for terrifying purposes. Kass is right, cloning should be banned in humans. I myself still had a hard time figuring out why I thought cloning was wrong after reading Kass’ arguments. Kass should have stuck with creating a stronger argument against the technological, liberal and meliorist views. I agree that there is definitely some repugnance to the idea of human cloning but Kass should not have argued that the repugnance we feel for human cloning is a reflection of a violation on nature and moral.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Altering natural-born feature with DNA is harmful, unethical, and detrimental to society because it is meddling with measures beyond our grasp. "The prospect of real designer babies—where it would be possible to reliably choose cosmetic traits such as complexion and hair color or even physical characteristics such as athleticism—remains a distant one. But that day may be drawing closer, thanks to advances in genetic technology.”(Naik) Genetic engineering is becoming a more popular topic every year, but doctors and gene specialist should spend more time looking for cures to diseases; rather than pleasing the hunger of ungrateful and unsatisfied parents. Playing God is a dangerous game that inevitably ends with a monster. If society eventually allows genetic…

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research on human embryonic stem cells, how ever is controversial, given the diverse views held in our society about the moral and legal status of early embryo.” (National Research 1). Opposers argue that destroying embryonic cells and fetuses to obtain stem cells is something humans should not mess with. The general public believes that biomedical researches are “playing god” by destroying embryonic cells, but scientists have a bigger fear. Scientists fear that stem cell research will eventually lead to the creation of human clones. The reasoning behind this fear…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Another topic Greely touched on is the ability for same sex couples to have children of their own. In Vitro allows them to either use their own sperm or eggs and they also have the option to get a donor. Now it is just the waiting game on whether or not “designer babies” will become the norm (Greely). This article was written to inform the reader that there is research being done on “designer babies”. The topic might not be a social norm quite yet, but that is because there is still a lot of research left to be done.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because lives are saved, families are given hope, and a non-curable disease is possibly cured, stem cell research and transplantations are moral practices. For certain groups of American citizens, stem cell research is not a moral or safe practice because it gives “godly” powers to humans, foreshadows the eventual human clones and uses cells from innocent human babies. The counterargument is not valid because it expresses the fear and has no valid point. Additionally, the point that stem cells are using previously destroyed tissue cells to benefit another is being overlooks. Stem cell transplantation and research has the potential of growing in a valuable medical practice that can diminish human suffering and prolong human life as a…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Benefits Of Cloning

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cloning, however, is very controversial and there is often debate about whether or not the cloning of humans, animals, or even body parts should be allowed (Murnaghan 1). Some advocates for cloning believe that it offers significant benefits to society, while opponents of this topic suggest otherwise. Though both ideas coexist in society, scientists should only be permitted to clone humans and animals for medical purposes only. One significant medical benefit from cloning would be that it saves people and animals’ lives. For example, in 2012, a three-year-old girl, named Pippie Kruger, was severely burnt after a kerosene tank exploded during a backyard barbecue (Tedx 10:50-11:00).…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are also many arguments against stem cell research. People argue that destroying embryos is also destroying innocent lives. Stem cells should only be used from babies that were aborted. Abortion isn 't a good thing, but at least the unborn babies will have somewhat of a purpose in life. A lot of taxpayers don 't think their money should be going towards something that they all don 't agree with.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics