Cloning Argumentative Analysis

Improved Essays
Want to have another you wandering around? Neither does the rest of the world. But apparently, a lot of scientist would like to make that possible. They would like to clone anything that they deem necessary. Proponents of the idea say that cloning could lead to more disease resistant plants, but, this very creation could cause lack of DNA diversity. So, cloning should not be allowed because because people are still very conflicted on the subject, also the cost of cloning is too extreme and, it would lack in DNA diversity. First of all, cloning is still very new to the world. Although cloning has been around since Dolly the Sheep, the whole world is still conflicted on the subject. Some feel that the cloning of embryos, is morally repugnant and may feel that the idea of cloning humans is “playing God” according to “What are the Pros and Cons of Cloning?” So, if too many people are conflicted based on a moral stance, it will create too much turmoil in the science community. Considering how difficult it is to create clones, scientist cannot afford to get their clones rejected solely based on morale. Others also fear that people could decide to genetically engineer super kids, according to “What are the Pros and …show more content…
Especially, when scientists created the possibility for cloning particular organs, for transplants, or for any other medical usage. In the article “Pros And Cons Of Cloning” it states that “Technical...of human society”. Seems like a phenomenal idea but, the cost could make the organs exclusively for those who can afford the process. Another dilemma is if insurance will cover the cost according to “What are the Pros and Cons of Cloning” it states that “it would be hard to know if health insurance company would pay for a person to have an organ cloned.” If people are unable to pay for their organs then there isn’t a point to creating them. So, its lack of availability to the common person is still

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Is Human Cloning Possible

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Instead of creating clones that have to experience the effects of the imperfections, scientists should focus more on improving the lives of people by using other ways that does not include ethics or does not cause harm to others. These scientists are making the clones suffer through unneeded complications. Head states in the article, “Should human cloning be banned?”, “Scientists generally agree that it would be irresponsible to clone a human being until cloning has been perfected, given that the cloned human would probably face serious, and ultimately terminal, health issues.” It is impetuous for scientists to continue cloning because the babies that were made are alive and have their own feelings. They should not be forced to live with health issues their entire life because of our imperfect experiments. Scientists only want to create clones in order to have better organ donors.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments have been made stating that cloning could save lives, but it would jeopardize many more than it would save the scientists from the article “The Cloning Debate. Should All Forms Of Human Cloning Be Banned?” State “Many experts say reproductive cloning is grossly unethical because it jeopardizes the health of would-be child clones. They note that efforts to clone sheep, pigs, goats and other animals yield few live births, and that many live-born mammal clones die within weeks or months because of abnormalities.” If humans were to reproduce through cloning we would have very little success and the children would not live for very long. Why…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ESCR (embryonic stem cell research) is argued to be a motive that is unfair as well as the debate on whether it should be declared illegal due to the possible death, pain and unfair treatment to all involved ("Ten Problems with Embryonic Stem Cell Research."). It explains the reasons and beliefs of the other party. An additional concern of the opposing part is that fact that, "Humans should not be trying to play God and some argue that stem cell research in the far future can lead to knowledge on how to clone humans. It is hard to say whether this is true, but we have seen devastating consequences of other research-programs, even with good intentions, such as nuclear research (Stem Cell Research-Pros and Cons). The quote explains the human fear behind the matter of stem cell research.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research on human embryonic stem cells, how ever is controversial, given the diverse views held in our society about the moral and legal status of early embryo.” (National Research 1). Opposers argue that destroying embryonic cells and fetuses to obtain stem cells is something humans should not mess with. The general public believes that biomedical researches are “playing god” by destroying embryonic cells, but scientists have a bigger fear. Scientists fear that stem cell research will eventually lead to the creation of human clones. The reasoning behind this fear…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Altering natural-born feature with DNA is harmful, unethical, and detrimental to society because it is meddling with measures beyond our grasp. "The prospect of real designer babies—where it would be possible to reliably choose cosmetic traits such as complexion and hair color or even physical characteristics such as athleticism—remains a distant one. But that day may be drawing closer, thanks to advances in genetic technology.”(Naik) Genetic engineering is becoming a more popular topic every year, but doctors and gene specialist should spend more time looking for cures to diseases; rather than pleasing the hunger of ungrateful and unsatisfied parents. Playing God is a dangerous game that inevitably ends with a monster. If society eventually allows genetic…

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Monsanto Pros And Cons

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages

    According to Monsanto, there is not a needed requirement to label genetically modified foods appearing on supermarket shelves. Many consumers just want to be aware of what foods are being genetically modified, but Monsanto automatically disagrees on the bill (Barrett). This would generally make the public feel skeptical over Monsanto’s true motive in the biotech industry. Why would Monsanto and other companies want to hide whether or not some crop has been genetically modified? The reason could be that genetically modified crops and its “dose” of Round-Up Ready do result with many negative effects as well as possibly being the start to all food security problems due to its recent discovery and insubstantial safety verifications.…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This type of research has heightened extensive controversy in the aspects of religion. Each religion seems to have a particular opinion of stem cell research. For example, the majority of Christians supports adult stem cell research but opposes embryonic stem cell research since it can potentially create and or destroy human embryos. In the Ten Commandments, it is stated that “Thou shalt not kill,” which directly opposes what stem-cell research performs, and “Thou shalt not have strange gods before Me,” however; the implication of a scientist…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gene Doping In Spiderman

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    But to create a super human and using science technology to manipulate a human’s natural qualities has many negative aspects. The first disadvantage is that humans will lose their individuality when creating a super human, everyone will be exactly the same. Next, it is unethical to subject animals and embryos to undergo testing when no one can tell whether they are suffering or not. There are moral aspects that need to be addressed, if this research were to be continued there must be a board regulating every step. The society will benefit from preventing harmful diseases but the health risks the research poses is huge.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So in those defenses the debate over cloning in the U.S. remains intense because it is against human nature. Cloning is an very unnecessary procedure. There are medical reasons why we shouldn’t be able to clone humans. For example, they are cloning people just to use the clones for their organs . We already have donors for the situation of organs.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The debate from the public is normally more for the NO side of things, saying that it’s unhuman or against nature or its going to become cloning. Professor tony Perry has a debate saying that “there are diseases coded in DNA that are cause by cloning”, some parents will say “I don’t want my children to have these defects”. The UK Medical research council has many spokesmen that are saying testing the embryo at IVF for diseases could be the best way to prevent the Designer babies from getting the disease. The government in the UK are going in deep to decide what to do about the designer baby problems and the positive points also. Hugh Whitehall told the BBC that“.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays