Cloned animals are frequently left with lifelong health problems, or bear the agony of losing their organs due to unpredictability and profitability of cloning. Paul Stark voice his concerns of cloning humans as, “It could lead to fetal farming--growing cloned embryos to a later stage so that their valuable organs can be harvested for research or transplantation.” (Stark 7). As cloning produces valuable organs for transplantation, the desires of humanity would inevitably lead to rise of farming of human clones where their rights would be violated in order to benefit the humans who are not cloned. These embryos would have to bear the pain left by organ transplantation or research, while the uncloned humans would continue to live longer without any adverse health effects, highlighting the harrowing cruelties of cloning a
…show more content…
Marc Guerra illustrates how cloning empowers humans to advocate for more extreme research on cloning, which comes with consequences being forced down on clones who have to live with adverse health effects. The empowering of humans to serve as creators of humanity by cloning is clearly unethical, as its contradicts the principles that god was the creator. Additionally, Marc Guerra heavily implies how this new founded powers will erase any traces of moral restraint on humans in cloning, and create opportunities for more unethical uses of cloning. The designing of human embryos through eugenics would means that cloned humans would probably have to live with problematic choices of genetic makeup, or non cloned humans would not be able to reproduce. Michael Cook illustrates the clone researcher “accused of being callous and indifferent to the suffering of patients with chronic illness” (Cook). Michael Cook illustrates the lack of ethics through of the lack of care present for the subjects in the experiment. Despite the cruelties that subjects may bear in the experiment, the clone researchers would ignore these subjects in favor of producing
Marc Guerra illustrates how cloning empowers humans to advocate for more extreme research on cloning, which comes with consequences being forced down on clones who have to live with adverse health effects. The empowering of humans to serve as creators of humanity by cloning is clearly unethical, as its contradicts the principles that god was the creator. Additionally, Marc Guerra heavily implies how this new founded powers will erase any traces of moral restraint on humans in cloning, and create opportunities for more unethical uses of cloning. The designing of human embryos through eugenics would means that cloned humans would probably have to live with problematic choices of genetic makeup, or non cloned humans would not be able to reproduce. Michael Cook illustrates the clone researcher “accused of being callous and indifferent to the suffering of patients with chronic illness” (Cook). Michael Cook illustrates the lack of ethics through of the lack of care present for the subjects in the experiment. Despite the cruelties that subjects may bear in the experiment, the clone researchers would ignore these subjects in favor of producing