From a list provided in the article Dunlea et al., (2011), the article included the projection of climate change good or bad effects and the projected synopsis of their probability. The article further explains that identifying and evaluating the consequences of the different scenarios should be documented, including the work that was inadvertent because the unplanned could also lead to the aftermath of something that may result in a change for the …show more content…
He also talks about reducing the enormities of greenhouse gases and how they could eliminate. Steffen, (2011), includes the areas of where to start in reducing the main factors in climate change. He also explains that the world is growing in a high number and with those growing numbers we will not be able to keep up with a quick fix of eliminating the burning of fossil fuels that are released from smoke stacks, tailpipes, and other objects that use energy. By the mid-century we are going to have about eight billion or more people that lives on this earth; and taking away from emission gases may not be enough. Reducing the enormities of the climate changes we will have to take on other resources that will help climate change; because taking on eight billion people will take an enormous amount of energy to put towards clean energy. He explains that if we are seriously talking about tackling climate change we need to look somewhere else. He also explains that the solution may be right at your fingertips. The cities that we are building are opportunities. Suburban cities account for more than 50 percent of all household emissions; and in order to reduce those emissions the cities need to