Marc Antony Compare And Contrast

Improved Essays
The movement of Cleopatra's barge from the Cydnus River to Tarsus was a very prolific arrival that caught the attention of numerous individuals, especially Marc Antony. The two recounts depicted in Shakespeare's literature and the Cleopatra film offer slightly similar, but largely different stories of how the event occurred.
Shakespeare used much more colorful language in order to depict it the story such as when he described Cleopatra's boat by saying "The poop was beaten gold, purple the sails, and so perfumed that the winds were lovesick with them." The constant exaggeration and excellent imagery caused for the scenery to seem fancier and dreamier. Shakespeare spoke of gods, cupids, and mermaids which made the imagination run with the idea this was some sort of fantasy. Along with these descriptions, Shakespeare portrayed the interaction between Cleopatra and Antony to be very calm and romantic. They were inviting each other to banquets and as was in love with her throughout the story, but could not leave her. However, in the Cleopatra clip, Cleopatra was much more powerful and demanding than what she was depicted by Shakespeare.
The beginning of the clip seemed to closely align with Shakespeare's descriptions in the sense that the barge was glorious, and people flocked to see Cleopatra. Antony was
…show more content…
In this depiction, Cleopatra acted proud, but reserved and purposely tried to subtly upset Octavian because she did not respect him. This Octavian became angrier and tried to force Cleopatra into revealing her children's whereabouts while convincing her to go to Rome, but was unable to until he promised her that Caesarion and his descendants would rule over Egypt after her death. This Cleopatra is in much more control and calling the shots which forces Octavian to compromise in order to receive what he demands, which slightly differs from the second

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    On the other hand, Cleopatra had almost complete control over Antony; she was the opposite of what a Roman woman was supposed to be. 2. In Plutarch’s description Cleopatra had significant control over Antony. Plutarch states that Cleopatra had such hold over Antony that he was in Alexandria with her, while his wife was at war on his behalf.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Suggested Score 80% Accept Suggested Score Manual Score: Manual Score Prompt Rubric | Checklist Two Julius Caesar Speeches Brutus and Mark Antony both delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar. How do these speeches relate to the conclusion of the play?…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is therefore crucial that they understand that Shakespeare’s use of manipulation not immoral but aims to position his audience to see a different aspect of a political figure. Shakespeare’s intention for positioning the audience to view Prince Hal as a heroic figure was to please Queen Elizabeth. She remained in control of any role-play which took place under her rule. The similarities between herself and Prince Hal exemplifies the many Elizabethan Shakespeare plays containing a reflection of herself. Thus, the heroic and lovable portrayal of Prince Hal hides his conflicting views on Queen Elizabeth, where the Queen was in a neutral position when it came to wars, and other times where she was able to consolidate stability in England.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Persuasion is when a character is able to convince someone else to help them or to prove someone wrong. Everyday we use some form of persuasion even if it is to win an argument. The power of persuasion could lead to a tragedy, destruction of an entire city or it can bring happiness to people. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Brutus and Cassius kill the most powerful man in Rome and thus bringing the downfall to Rome and to their own lives. In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Marc Antony has the most powerful persuasion skills because he is able to convince people by using rhetorical techniques and stronger emotions than anyone else.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Shakespeare is regarded as the greatest writer in the English language. He is well-known for many of his works such as Romeo and Juliet, Hamlet, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, etc. Along with these works is “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. In “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”, Shakespeare writes two very well known speeches that are delivered by the characters Brutus and Mark Antony during the funeral of Julius Caesar. In speeches, Shakespeare uses ethos, pathos and logos on behalf of Mark Antony and Brutus to persuade the citizens of their own beliefs.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shakespeare, distilling north’s version at the time when his creative skills were at their climax, was able to utilize the language and the stories precisely to fit his intentions. He remained phenomenally truthful to the original in most cases. For example, in the well known speech presented by Enobarbus honoring Cleopatra ( II.2.193) , but sometimes he did not include troublesome notes and bolstered the material, including his very own events in order to formulate his plays and to conjure the atmosphere for his verse translation.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Julius Caesar and Brutus: A Comparison In the Shakespearean Classic Julius Caesar, many intricate characters are presented and compounded throughout the storyline. However, I will focus on the two main characters from this play, and compare their morals and personalities, to decide which one is the better man. In this essay, three main points will be presented. Caesars faults, morals, and actions Brutus 's faults, morals, and actions Which one seems to be the more needed in Rome By the end of this comparison essay, I hope to have shown the characters for who they are, and how they act, along with their basic morals.…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar Mark Antony’s speech is more persuasive than the one Brutus gives because he uses better tactics and more powerful rhetoric. In his speech Brutus uses gravitas and ethos which in the end backfires because it makes his speech less relatable and portrays him as better than the plebeians. Mark Antony gives his speech after Brutus and he uses this to his advantage by using verbal irony and more specially sarcasm. Mark Antony uses pathos and exaggeration to create powerful rhetoric and to connect with the human emotions of the plebeians. In his funeral speech Mark Antony uses tactics that better relate to human nature and better connect with the plebeians rather than Brutus who tries to appeal to logic…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For more than 2 thousand years, Romans have created a wrong bad picture of Cleopatra, unlike new historians, who viewed the true picture by the new historical evidence. With each new time period, Cleopatra’s reputation changes, and her portray is colored with more details. Cleopatra’s reputations varied from ancient Rome, ancient Egypt and Modern World due to their view. Moreover, her reputation has been changing over time influenced by new historical evidence and new theories wither it is reliable or unreliable, whether historians were objectives or subjective.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether public speeches result from those such as Adolf Hitler or Martin Luther King, Jr., their remarkable ability to ignite the population persuades people to take up arms regardless of the cause. In the midst of Act III in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both speak to the bewildered citizenry regarding Caesar’s demise. Resulting from a handful of conspirators assassinating him in the Senate, Caesar’s death sparks chaos which demands explanation. Thus, some individuals assert Brutus’ speech over Antony’s by claiming that Brutus’ effect and ability to direct his point sooner propel him higher than Antony. Unfortunately, this argument fails to acknowledge Antony’s mightier impact on the audience and his employment of a larger…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Battle Of Actium Essay

    • 2111 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Aftermath of the Battle of Actium Known for its powerful leaders and diverse culture, the Roman Empire has carved its name into history. One of the most significant events in Roman history include the Battle of Actium; a battle that decidedly ended Roman Republic and began the foundation of the great Roman Empire. During the Roman Civil War, Julius Caesar’s death in 44 BC sparked the struggle of power between Octavian and Mark Antony. As a result of this struggle, Octavian’s navy forces battled against Mark Antony and Cleopatra VII in 31 BC to take over the Roman Eastern province. This battle, otherwise known as the Battle of Actium, took place in Actium, Western Greece (Tucker, 2010) and was the last battle of the civil wars that took place…

    • 2111 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony showed remorse and a bit of happiness saying his speech at Caesar’s funeral. Happiness came from him describing his Captain (Caesar) as a person. Reciting memories and good times they shared. Although, he didn’t praise Caesar is his speech as he reminded the crowd in his speech “I came to bury Caesar, not praise him.” Antony still shows he loves Caesar by saying “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me.”…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, there are two speeches regarding the same topic that are presented to the public. Both Mark Antony and Brutus delivered speeches after the death of Julius Caesar, consisting of their opinion and explanation of what has happened and why, for the needs of the Roman people. Both of the speeches have a very distinct and different purpose, and appealed to different mental senses of the crowd (Ethos, Logos, and Pathos). As Mark Antony 's words were favored and followed, riots broke out and Rome was indescribably angry and upset upon the tragedy of Julius Caesar. This event foreshadowed the conclusion of the story, and set the scene for the following conflicts that reeked havoc upon Rome…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Yara Mneimneh Mrs. Kate Bowler English 10 A 12 December 2015 Analysis of Marc Antony’s Funeral Speech In Act III Scene II, Marc Antony presents his famous speech that begins with “Friends, Romans, Countrymen, I come to bury Caesar not to praise him”, this speech was able to change the minds of the audience to turn against the conspirators. The purpose of Antony's speech was to show tribute to his friend Caesar in a eulogy and to revolt the audience. Antony wanted the audience to revolt for him to seek revenge on Caesar’s brutal murder. The purpose contributed to the significance of the speech in the play.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays