Tort Of Negligence Case Study

Good Essays
Introduction
The first question was what legal risks that Clean Aqua is facing under statute law for the product. The court of law applied in this case is the tort of negligence. Negligence is a tort – a civil wrong recognised by the courts which entitles the injured person to compensation. The manufacturer, Clean Aqua supplies their appliances to the retailer, EnviroPro that is later sold to the customers. The customer appliance later bought the appliance and cause the customer to be sick. It is Under the statutory law, the customer is able to take action against both retailer and the manufacturer.

Duty of care
The action for negligence is an action for damages brought by a plaintiff who has been injured by the defendant. In this case, the
…show more content…
First requirement is called causation. But for test was establish in Chapel v Hart. Second requirement is the foreseeability or remoteness of damage. The damage must have a direct consequence of the negligent act and reasonably foreseeable. This was established in the case The Wagon Mound. But in this case, the action of Clean Aqua causes the damages to the customer. Due to the unsafe goods, the customer falls ill, misses five weeks of work (economic loss) and develops sickness that impact her life. All these damages can be avoidable if Aqua Clean provides safety defect of the products. These damages were reasonable foreseeable result of breach to a reasonable …show more content…
The retailer failed to show care by selling Aqua Clean appliance without the packaging that contain the warning information. The retailer could held responsible and own duty of care to the customer. Through careful labelling, manufacturer may reduce their exposure in negligence. The relevant case to this is Holmes v Ashford. Conclusion
Aqua Clean would be liable in the tort for the compensation for the damages that causes the customer. But precedent may suggest that Aqua Clean did marketed the appliance with warnings just that the retailer sold it without the packaging of the product. EnviroPro failed to discharge that duty. Hence, the retailer owns a duty of care to the customer for the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Additionally, “a mortgage broker acts in a fiduciary capacity that not only imposes upon him the duty of acting in the highest good faith toward his principal but also precludes the agent from obtaining any advantage over the principal in any transaction had by virtue of his agency.” Brewer v. Indymac Bank, 609 F. Supp. 2d 1104, 1119 (E.D. Cal 2009). From the above statements, it is clear that Mr. Salesperson breached his fiduciary duties when he violated the professional code of…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Can plaintiff recover compensation for injuries sustained by using a product, even though he did not purchase the product and did not prove negligence on the part of the manufacturer? Both the plaintiff and defendants appealed the jury decision. The plaintiff demanded a reversed judgment that in the favor of the retailer. However, according to product liability and strict liability, the manufacturer should be liable for their harmful or defective products. The manufacturer should be liable for the negligence if their product to cause harm to the users.…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Negligent Tort Case Study

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If the company knew of the defective product and continued to sell them to consumers and an injury transpired it could be considered Intentional Tort. Not recalling a product that could be harmful and can cause detriment to a consumer may perhaps leave the wholesaler or distributor liable because it is their responsibility to make sure all regulations and policies are met. This may also border on negligence on the part of the seller if injury or death should occur. Negligence involves cases where manufacturers or suppliers purposely place defective, dangerous or faulty products that result in impairment, injury or death. If the company continues to sell this product after the recall they can be liable for Intentional Tort.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the case, the product manufactured by the defendant supposed not be injured their users after applying their product. By applying consumer expectation test, the defendant also has the product liability since hair care products should not be harmful to their customer’s body. Also, the manufacturers owe a duty to design and provide safe packages for their customers. While the defendant, Blondey Blonde, did not fulfill their responsibility and could not provide packages, containers that are tamperproof. As a result, their product also has the defect in design.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Grocery, Inc. Case Study

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Company A is responsible for the poor workmanship of Company B. Company A breached the contract by substituting the goods and services that Company A guaranteed with the goods and services of Company B. A material breach occurred when Company A didn’t gain substantial benefits from the renovation. An addendum could have been created to cover the commercial impossibility of Company A, which would have allowed Grocery, Inc. to consider new terms of the contract. In this case, Company A did not follow all the elements required of the contract, therefore, Grocery, Inc.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stern was ethical. He involved himself in deep investigation and found out that the floods occurred due to negligence of Pittston company. He found out that company did not build an effective drainage system for the dam (Dalton 56). Also, he set to find out the impact of the floods on the survivors by interviewing them. He goes ahead to ensure the survivors receive justice by getting fair compensation from the defendant considering psychological trauma they went through.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They owed the plaintiffs this because the “explosion and resulting losses were caused or contributed to by the negligence of the registered owners,” (Polischuk, 2015). The defendants also owed the plaintiffs a standard of care. This standard of care was breached due to the owners of the property not using “a warning device capable of detecting an escape of natural gas; did not take reasonable steps in response to elevated natural gas levels; failed to ensure any appliances or other devices would not serve as a source of ignition for escaped natural gas; and failed to adequately inspect, monitor or maintain their portion of the gas line,” (Polischuk, 2015). Due to the breached standard of care, damages to the plaintiff resulted. These damages were that the properties and buildings of the plaintiffs had serious structural, physical, and/or foundational damages caused by the explosion.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is a breach of duty because Odwalla did not act in a reasonable manner when given the facts. Another example of breach of duty is when Odwalla’s head of quality assurance told them to add an additional layer of contamination protection by employing a chlorine based wash after having the U.S. Army reject the sale of their juice because of the high risk of contamination, but the management team was too concerned with the taste. Odwalla had a breach of duty by not adding additional contamination protection which did breach the duty of producing a safe product for their…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Negligence is consider tort and is a civil wrong committed against the person that the court remedies in the form of action for damages occurred such compensation. Negligence is the unintentional commission or omission of an act that a reasonably prudent person would or would not do. It is a form of conduct which is caused by the carelessness of the standard of care on reasonable members of the society; In the medical field it is consider malpractice. The person who shows negligence does not use their best judgment against possible risk. For example, in the case Dr. Haskins did not examine Kelly nor review his chart.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While in the past you were only liable to the people you entered into contract with, however under tort law outsiders can also have a right to punitive damages (Yates, 157).This means that there can be a duty of care owed to someone who isn’t a direct client if they sustained a financial or physical loss because of your negligence. The professional is liable for the advice used by anyone considered to be a ‘foreseeable plaintiff’. For example in the case of Haig v. Bramford, Bramford was deemed liable for Haig’s financial losses even though he wasn’t a direct client of Bramford’s (Yates, 160). As Jennifer knew that Julia Chen was using this information, she owed her a duty of care and is liable for her economic loss. Additionally, the information has to have been used by its intended purpose.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays