The Pros And Cons Of Modern Liberalism

Improved Essays
Liberalism is defined as a political and social philosophy, which encourages freedom of the individual, and involves little or no state intervention. The earliest liberal ideology was classical, which emerged at the dawn of the Enlightenment era. Classical liberalism, sometimes called ‘nineteenth century liberalism’ ( Heywood,2004), dominated the era with its doctrines based around the idea of self interest enticing human behaviour, stemming from utilitarianism theory. Modern liberalism, on the other hand was born towards the end of the nineteenth century and centred around a more sensitive outlook towards state intervention, compared to classical liberalism, where emphasis lay on a ‘watchman’ state (Heywood,2004). This essay will examine …show more content…
This ideology leans towards a ‘positive’ view of freedom, believing that government intervention should only exists to assist vulnerable and weak individuals to thrive and achieve their goals. Social intervention exists to protect people from the atrocities of society that will interfere with their wellbeing, whereas, economic intervention seeks to correct the wrong doings of laissez-faire capitalistic period of the Enlightenment, which caused social and economic inequalities, such as unemployment ( Heywood,2004).Modern liberalism had reached its climax during the post war period , with the regeneration of industries and the introduction of welfare programs such as pension, family allowances, health care and advanced education fees. These programmes where economically successful, having saved the U.S. out of the Great Depression. Therefore, the goal of the government is to “help people to help themselves” …show more content…
The oldest liberal ideology, classical liberalism, which first emerged during the enlightenment era, expresses humans as naturally egoistic beings who are more than capable of governing themselves. Classical liberals, such as Thomas Paine, refer to the state as a “necessary evil” that establishes law for the good of society, but also impairs the natural right of freedom of the individual, illustrating a ‘negative’ view of freedom. Classical liberals believe in a laissez-faire and free capitalist economy, a theory that is strongly criticised by modern liberals who argue the economic and social implications of a free trade system. On the other hand, modern liberalism shows a ‘positive’ view towards freedom, maintaining that state intervention should exists solely to enrich the lives vulnerable individuals in order for them to prosper and grow. In addition, the modern sense of liberalism believes that social and economic intervention of the state will rectify mistake brought on by the classical liberal era, e.g. unemployment. However, modern liberalism is criticised for supporting collective growth, rather than individual growth, which completely abandons the theory of liberalism. It also raises uncertainty as to the real function of the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Conscience of a Liberal A government directly interfering with the economy of its nation is contrary to the ideals of basic capitalism. When the New Deal was introduced by Franklin Delano Roosevelt in response to the Great Depression, it was viewed with skepticism due to its perceived anti-capitalistic policies and seemingly communist-esque ideas, which struck fear in the eyes of Americans. However, Roosevelt proved that government involvement in the economy is not only stable, but also is a fair equalizer amongst a nation’s citizens. Paul Krugman’s, The Conscience of a Liberal, discusses the major political situations between the Great Depression and the twenty- first century.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Enron Neoliberalism

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the late 1970’s, when Carter was president, America was experiencing extreme stagflation where there was great inflation as well as zero rate of economic change, a stagnant economy. This resulted in the US, as well as Britain, turning to neoliberalism in hopes of changing the economy’s current condition (Harvey). While neoliberalism is interpreted by Harvey as, “a political project to re-establish the conditions for capital accumulation and to restore power to the economic elites”, which is exactly what neoliberalism does, advocates for neoliberalism were focusing on the idea of freedom to get many Americans to believe that this was the way to go. Not only this, but neoliberalism proposed the bettering of the population’s lives by “liberating individual entrepreneurial freedoms”, widely through a deregulated market and trade (Harvey). When Ronald Raegan became president, defeating Carter, he turned much more eagerly to neoliberalism than Carter had been (Harvey).…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberalism is a political philosophy or way of thinking based on the ideas of liberty and equality for all in society. With this theory or political policy in place, it is ideal for the people of the society to have the majority of the power in regards to decision making in the community. Meaning that the people have the power to vote for the people in government, freedom of press, freedom to practice any religion, and keep any civil or natural right reserved no matter what transpires in the government. Liberalism also has a strong support in a person being an individual first before being a component in a society.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A commentary that exemplifies the Progressive era and the embodiments of freedom that came with it. Through his detailed descriptions of the poor working conditions of workers in industries such as meatpacking and steel, Sinclair makes a strong case for government as a moral arbiter to protect workers. A class, the book concludes, that should rise up against their oppressors to form a new society free from problems such as wage slavery. This mentality perfectly encapsulates the Progressive ideology, a shift away from the traditionally liberal conception of freedom of individuality to a more collectivist approach, where there is a necessity for people in society to work together. Ultimately giving way to a new definition of liberalism and ushering in the idea of a welfare state.…

    • 2087 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberalism in America is growing and led by the tyrannical elites that funnel the money to the appropriate venues. We see it now more than ever with the current election cycle of false portrayals and manipulation. We have seen basic political debate cease to prevail as liberals garner support to false claims. A This in turn has its ill effects on society with an ever increasing government size, and the total displacement of intrinsic social systems that have been in place for decades. This erosion of morality and overreaching of government function on regulation of your daily life, has led to a sensitive entitled generation where it has somehow required to disregard your own values and become sympathetic and tolerant of…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    emphasis on reason, social utility, pragmatic reform, and aversion to arbitrary rule.” (337) when so plainly defined and described, I have to question, why is the concept of liberalism considered a bad…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    After the post-war consensus planning of 1945, Britain and its society took a sharp left turn from the old world ideals practiced by the previous federal administrations in Britain. From the profoundly right wing political schema present in the pre-war society to the strongly liberal left that came to power in parliament after the war, the federal landscape of modern Britain warped during the 1940’s. The foundation of a social welfare republic and the rise of the labour party created a nation that was not focused on old world ideals of noble cause, monetarism and subsistent privilege. In the new welfare state, the four pillars of centralized government planning, nationalized resource industries, cradle to the grave social security and focus…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Leonard Hobhouse wrote an influential book ‘Liberalism’ (1911) which presented the major ideas of the New Liberalism at that time. The name of the sixth chapter of the writing “The Heart of Liberalism” is connected with workings of Mill which are claimed to form the actual ‘heart’ of liberalism. In this chapter, Hobhouse highlights major beliefs of liberalism such as liberty, equality of opportunity, individualism, organicism, and harmony. His argument follows from more narrow concepts to more broad concepts which incorporate all of the aspects mentioned in the beginning of the chapter. More broad concepts like harmony and organicism are the most important ideas in which Hobhouse along with other ‘New Liberal’ theorists believed in.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberalism is a political ideology that links together politics and economy via the free market. While liberalism may seem to be a favorable philosophy in some ways, there are startling fundamental contradictions within this political ideology that are not so appealing. Liberalism has long…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This analysis will critically review chapter six ‘The Heart of Liberalism’ of ‘Liberalism’ by Hobhouse (1911), in which he states his main principles and arguments on his idea of social liberalism. To him, this ideology should evolve and develop with time to fulfil the needs of society, so it can be seen as an expansion to John Stuart Mill’s view of classical liberalism (1859, pg.8). The main argument Hobhouse presents is the concept of organicism in society and its strong link with the individuals living in it, thus they are interconnected. Furthermore, the idea of equality of opportunity for people occurs through state intervention, which he argues does not mean the loss of liberty, contradicting Mill’s view of limiting state power. The arguments presented in this chapter will also be analysed with the work of Andrew Vincent to find support or criticism for it.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Liberalism is a legal theory that emphasizes individual rights and freedoms over utilitarianism. John Locke is known as one of the key figures in liberalism, and he describes a social contract that would ensure individual rights and an equal relationship between citizens and the government. There are four main themes that are outlines by Brian Tamanaha. Firstly; “the individual is free to the extent that the laws are created democratically. Citizens have thereby consented to, indeed authored, the rules they are obligated to follow.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a liberal democracy there is a presence of freedom that exists within its society. The lie that citizens live within in a liberal society is a lie of their own making. According to Havel “the crisis is hidden from people and the more deeply do they become immersed in it” (208). This lie is to meant to mask the illusion that in the West we are not truly free, we are instead being exploited in ways more “subtle and refined than the…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Charter Of Rights Analysis

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Power is distributed between the federal and provincial government due to Canada being a federal state. Both levels of government shares the obligation and jurisdiction over particular sectors of law and divisions such as; health care, corrections and many more. The Queen of England is the head of the government and the Governor General acts as her representative in Canada and works alongside the Prime Minister, which leaves Canada as a constitutional monarchy.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Applying the theory of liberalism in the process of seizing power. Which the Liberalism theory is a concept that prioritizes the interests of the individual which is the main subject of this understanding. Liberalism bring the concept of freedom to live, think, act and work. In liberalism, the State must still ensure the freedom of the individual, and for the human jointly rule the country. Liberalism believes that it is not with violence, anarchism and coercion to obtain self-interest.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper, I will argue that Charles Taylor is correct for challenging the crude version of negative liberty and proving that it is indefensible in a liberal society, and by doing so making negative liberty a form of positive liberty. In his famous work, “What’s wrong with negative liberty?”, Charles Taylor takes on Isiah Berlin’s argument against negative liberty. In this essay, we will see Berlin’s distinction of different kinds of liberties, then go through Taylor’s paper on criticizing Berlin’s idea of negative liberty. We will also look at Taylor’s criticism of negative liberty’s advantages to liberalism’s goal of advancing individual prosperity.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays