I found it interesting because the authors bring in many researchers who did a lot of surveys and how they actually went and observed classrooms. These researches went too many different school and sat down and figured out behavior of the students and how they act in smaller classrooms to in comparisons of large classrooms. What i thought was surprising is that i found lots of articles fighting the argument of having smaller classrooms and why they are better for students. And in the studies they did in this article they did not find many differences. The argument I am trying to make is to have smaller classrooms and why they are better for student achievement. Seeing the counterclaim article is going to help me in my side of the argument because seeing that their studies only work in some states and in only some schools and not all schools are the same is going to boost my argument up because most schools do need smaller classrooms and that most schools with smaller classes have betters scores and percentage is effective. Most of the studies that they have are from observation and not asking students and or the teachers what they think. I feel that if they were to ask what they think, the counterclaim would change a lot. This counterclaim article had a lot to say about not having smaller classrooms and the authors brought in a lot data and tables about how the percentage of largerer classrooms have some, but not so many differences from students in smaller classes. My point of view on this article is surprising because of the points they make. Smaller classes should be able to be smaller just because these researches did their observations does not mean this should stop schools from making a difference in students lives. I feel like this
I found it interesting because the authors bring in many researchers who did a lot of surveys and how they actually went and observed classrooms. These researches went too many different school and sat down and figured out behavior of the students and how they act in smaller classrooms to in comparisons of large classrooms. What i thought was surprising is that i found lots of articles fighting the argument of having smaller classrooms and why they are better for students. And in the studies they did in this article they did not find many differences. The argument I am trying to make is to have smaller classrooms and why they are better for student achievement. Seeing the counterclaim article is going to help me in my side of the argument because seeing that their studies only work in some states and in only some schools and not all schools are the same is going to boost my argument up because most schools do need smaller classrooms and that most schools with smaller classes have betters scores and percentage is effective. Most of the studies that they have are from observation and not asking students and or the teachers what they think. I feel that if they were to ask what they think, the counterclaim would change a lot. This counterclaim article had a lot to say about not having smaller classrooms and the authors brought in a lot data and tables about how the percentage of largerer classrooms have some, but not so many differences from students in smaller classes. My point of view on this article is surprising because of the points they make. Smaller classes should be able to be smaller just because these researches did their observations does not mean this should stop schools from making a difference in students lives. I feel like this