Civil Forfeiture Research Paper

Decent Essays
Civil forfeiture is an attack on the fundamental American principal that a person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Civil forfeiture is a legal process that allows law enforcement officers to take assets and property from persons suspected of illegal activity without charging the owner(s) with wrongdoing. Civil forfeiture contradicts the values and foundations that the American legal system is built upon. Take James Lieto for example, a New York businessman who had $392,000 seized by the federal authorities because his money was mixed with illegal funds in an armored car that was seized by the FBI. Lieto had to wait until the government’s criminal case was finished before his property was returned to him, which took

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The article “TAKEN: Under civil forfeiture, Americans who haven’t been charged with wrongdoing can be stripped of their cash, cars, and even homes. Is that all we’re losing?” written by Sarah Stillman, she teaches at yale, a writer for the New York Times, and has been awarded multiple awards for her writing. Under the civil forfeiture or civil seizure the police are allowed to seize assets from drug deals or other criminal activities and use that money to supplement their department 's budget. Ms. Stillman makes a persuasive argument with rhetorical devices and when one analyzes the text it becomes apparent that she is arguing that some police departments budgets have been cut causing them to rely on these claims to make up for the lack of…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction The purpose of this paper is to analyze and discuss issues with the three strikes law. There are many issues, but for the purpose of this paper, four issues were analyzed and discussed. They are; [1] prison overcrowding, [2] cost, [3] fairness of sentencing, and [4] deterrence.…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plea Bargaining Introduction In 1954 the Supreme Court of the United States overturned Plessy v. Ferguson which legalized Jim Crow. Although overt racism was outlawed, many believed the problem to be solved. Most people believed the problem was segregation but segregation was a representation of an institutional value system of race, gender and wealth.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Webster-Merriam definition of a plea bargain is an agreement of which someone accused of a crime admits to a less serious crime in order to be given a less severe punishment. This is a very simple and optimistic definition of a nuanced situation that can have many positive and negative effects on the subjects involved. There are three different types of plea bargains: fact bargaining, sentence bargaining, and charge bargaining. Fact bargaining is the least common where the accused may only agree to certain facts about a case. Sentence bargaining is an agreement to an amount of time, usually greatly reduced, sentenced.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In August of 1861, President Lincoln signed the 1st Confiscation Act formalizing to some degree Butler’s contraband argument by authorizing the United States army to seize any slave used to aid the Confederate military. This however did not resolve the ambiguity of the status of the majority of enslaved people who now numbered in the thousands in and around Union army camps. The decision as to whether these people were free, property of the army, or to be returned to their masters was essentially left to the discretion of individual army officers. The 2nd Confiscation Act passed by Congress in the summer of 1862 was far stronger than its predecessor authorizing the army to seize any property including human property of those in rebellion and…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is civil forfeiture? This law is a nationwide procedure; however, Mississippi is considered the worst for encouraging this abuse called policing for profit. It’s a law where police and prosecutors confiscate the private property of an individual who is allegedly suspected of an illegal drug activity but has never been convicted. “What (doth it) profit, my brethren, through a man say he hath faith, and have not works?” (James 2:14 KJV).…

    • 2228 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Power of Guilty Verdicts There exists a world not too far from ours, a world where no one laughs, no one smiles, and no one has enjoyable thoughts. In this place there is nothing to be found other than a near endless maze with rows upon rows of cells lit by the only fluorescent light bulb which dangles ten feet high above your head, there is no natural sunlight to be perceived, the last glimpse of the warm life giving photons was left behind the moment one enters the large metallic doors of this sorrowed place. This is a place where the only thing to be seen are humans confined to a minuscule grey box barely large enough to live in and the only thing to be heard is the horrid, silent screams of the minds whom make this place home,…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Forfeiture is the loss of property to the government because the property is believed to have been associated with criminal activity. Under this law, civilians are not required to be charged with a crime to have their personal belongings seized by the federal government because it is an in rem action, meaning the trial is against their possessions, not the civilian personally. The members of the Office of the Law Revision Counsel of the United States House of Representatives should place restraints on 18 US Code § 981, commonly known as Civil Forfeiture, because it is an unconstitutional law that allows corrupt police officers to take advantage of innocent citizens, it has proven to be exceedingly expensive and difficult to regain possession…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Restitution African American people have been through a lot and it shows throughout past. I don’t think a majority of the 21st century African Americans believe that we need a reparations or restitution for our beloved ancestors and I don’t think that most of them that this situation has been introduced many times. We study our history every year we especially learn it from our books. Generation after Generation after Generation will know their past too. The many years of free labor that was giving, because of the disgusting maltreatment from crossing the ocean to living in cotton fields in this ridiculous journey because of the color our skin and because of greed for money and power.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wrongful convictions have been a topic of discussion for many decades within the United States Criminal Justice System. A wrongful conviction occurs when an individual is penalized in a court of law for a crime they never committed. Unfortunately, there are many components that can contribute to the unlawful arrest and conviction of an innocent person. Some of the variables can be as minuscule as an improper photo array line and as immense as government misconduct. Consequently, there are many flaws in the criminal procedure that leads to the conviction of an individual that increases the occurrence of wrongful convictions in America.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An out of court disposal is a way of dealing with a criminal offence, through methods which do not require a prosecution in court. Their use is often for low level, first time offences. There are a wide range of out of court disposals, they include (although are not limited to) the cannabis warning, simple caution, youth caution, conditional cautions, conditional discharge and penalty notices for disorder. For an out of court disposal to be given, the offender must admit their guilt and there should be enough evidence to prove that the individual committed the offence. It is also necessary to consider whether the public interest would be served by the using of such disposal.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Law in Action” While three strikes laws provided high hopes for many states, especially California, in controlling crime through deterrence and incapacitation, these laws produced many conflicting outcomes and consequences. As a means to better understand the actual application of these laws, the following will provide empirical research on the various impacts that three strikes had on crime, prisons, local and state criminal justice systems, and the public. While presenting both, positive and negative aspects of these laws, particular focus remains on the adverse outcomes associated with the implementation of three strikes laws. Crime As most sentencing laws, three strikes, was intended to limit crime.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people see civil asset forfeiture as a defective tactic used by the government. Civil asset forfeiture refers to a legal procedure by which the government is able to seize and ultimately forfeit the property of people suspected of wrong doing. The reason why people see this tactic as execrable is the fact that the government can seize property from people who were never convicted of or charged with a crime. Civil asset forfeiture is constantly seen as a way the government can victimize innocent people to make a profit on seized properties. Although this is a rather harsh tactic it is an absolutely credible tool used by the government and law enforcement agencies.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This paper is going to explain who can issue a search warrant, the grounds on why a search warrant will be issued, who issues it, and the people and location to be searched, and items that can be seized. I will also be informing you on who can issue a search and seizure warrant. I have attached a search and seizure warrant. The search and seizure falls under the Fourth Amendment. Let me begin with what a search warrant consists of.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unjust Law Research Paper

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is it just to break an unjust law? It is just to break an unjust law if it is morally wrong. Doing it in your own belief demonstrates the power behind the act to break an unjust law. Laws that may be appealing to the government might not be appealing to people who oppose them. Doing what's morally right is better than following an unjust law.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays