Civil Disobedience/Nonviolent Protest

Improved Essays
Even though we don’t hear about it as much civil disobedience is still a form of protest today. Yet it is not always shown since it is never as interesting as violent protest. By the end of this essay the reader should understand the history behind civil disobedience/nonviolent protest and how it is being used today. From Thoreau to the Bundy ranch case nonviolence protest was used.
In 1846 one of the earlier recorded acts of civil disobedient was performed by a man by the name of Henry D. Thoreau. Thoreau was imprisoned for one night in July 1846 for not paying his poll tax (Wal Web). He was suppose to stay in jail until he paid a fine, which he declined. But one of his relatives paid for it and got him out of jail. Thoreau did not pay his poll tax because he did not support the Mexican war. Also by him being in jail for one night he left an everlasting effect on civil disobedience.
The Mexican war was one of the reasons that got Thoreau in trouble for not paying his poll taxes. For starters Thoreau did not support the Mexican War because he viewed it as a way to spread slavery (Thoreau web). He believed that the only reason why America wanted to go to war with Mexico was to have a
…show more content…
The march that they took was 241 miles from the city of Sabarmati to the coastal town of Dandi (history2 Web). Gandhi and his followers were protesting the tax that the British put on the salt. This is kind of like the Boston tea party. Where a group of men boarded ships and destroyed British tea to show they did not approve of the tax placed on the tea. But instead of wanting to destroy the goods the marchers wanted to go to the beach and pick up clumps of salt and defy the British policy. When they got to the beach, they found that the police crushed all the salt clumps into the mud (history2 web). Yet that did not stop Gandhi and his followers, they were still able to reach down into the mud and pick out salt clumps

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He was also incarcerated and rationalized his intentions in his essay “Civil Disobedience.” He claims that the government is corrupt and that he doesn’t intend to pay taxes to the government when they are using the tax money to fund war. “If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose. If a thousand men were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood.” (Thoreau P.7)…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Thoreau declares, “The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think is right” (Ogunye). He ostensibly acknowledges no authority other than that of his own moral sense. In this essay, civil disobedience will be defined as the unwillingness to obey civil laws in an attempt to prompt change in governmental law or procedure, demonstrated by the use of nonviolent methods. The matter in question, then, is whether such civil disobedience is justified in a democratic society. The value of this essay’s argument is fairness; that is, defending human rights and granting each his or her due.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry D. Thoreau’s non-violent protest of not paying his poll tax may not have made a huge impact on society during 1846 when he took his stand for what he believed in, however, his stand would end up becoming a huge inspiration during the 60s and 70s. July of 1846 Henry D. Thoreau was arrested for not paying his poll tax for the last 4 years. (Brooks) Thoreau believed this poll tax helped support the Mexican-American war and the expansion of slavery into the southwest (Brooks); both of which he strongly disagreed with. He wanted to make a public statement of his refusal to support an unjust war and slavery itself and when asked by a friend who visited him in jail as to why he didn’t pay his tax his response was, “The question is not what am I doing in here, but what are you doing out there?” (The Power of…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both of the essays “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther king Jr. and “Civil Disobedience” by Henry Thoreau (1849) showed their understanding about civil disobedience multiple times. Their purpose of their essays was to argue for the right to disobey authority if there is social injustice. In “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Martin Luther King Jr. took direct action rather than waiting, potentially forever, for justice to come through the courts. King also analyzes the duty and the responsibility of the citizens to protest and to takes action against corrupt laws of the government.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Thoreau used the word “civil,” he meant “of or relating to citizens.” In modern usage, the term “civil disobedience” implies non-violence,…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau most objects to the funding of war against Mexico and the federal government's policies on slavery. He did not object merely because of slavery, but because someone had to act. Thoreau declared he refused to take part in “alliance ot the State” but instead “to withdraw and stand aloof from it effectually” (952). He argues that he much rather go to jail, instead of paying unfair taxes to fund the Mexican War which citizens believed was a plot to expand southern slavery into the north. Thoreau does not only call for resistance, but for the right actions to be taken by the people.…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. define the profound difference between just and unjust in their writings, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” While the two men have a different sound throughout each of their own pieces, there is much that they agree upon about civil disobedience once clearly thought out and read. With that being said, this paper will, respectively, discuss the general content of both writings, as well as the prominent similarities and differences noticeable in the two pieces. An example of political/cultural problems the United States is facing today that emulate civil disobedience will also be presented that link to both pieces. Towards the end of this paper, I intend…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau, born July 12, 1817 in Concord, Massachusetts, was known to be an American transcendentalist and philosopher. Thoreau became known for the essay he wrote when he spent a night in jail due to his refusal to pay taxes in objection to slavery and the Mexican War. The essay was published and titled “Resistance of Civil Government” but also known as “Civil Disobedience.” It is unsurprising that the government is dirty and corrupt so the purpose of the essay was to influence readers to not fear but protest government laws and commands or vote them out.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Dbq

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both Dr. Martin Luther King’s letter from Birmingham city jail as well as Henry David Thoreau’s civil disobedience shows how we should all practice civil disobedience for justice and to right an unjust law or action. Which bring up the question of whether civil disobedience is effective or ineffective in achieving change? Based on history we see civil disobedience is an effective way to achieve change in democratic countries. Civil disobedience can only work in a democratic country because in a democracy the government gains all its power from the people. In the case of dr. martin Luther king, he executed a nonviolent movement with thousands of fellow citizens to achieve change.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Dbq

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1846, Henry David Thoreau refused to pay taxes as a way to show his opposition to slavery. Thoreau was intentionally breaking the law without any violence. It was illegal not pay taxes. It is still illegal now and one can be sent to jail if they don’t pay their taxes, but Thoreau was doing it as a way to break the law because he believed in the abolition of slavery.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Susan B. Anthony, one of the leaders for the women's suffrage who gave many speeches in the United States and Europe, fought for the women's right to vote during the 1800s and early 1900s. She fought the government to the point where she was voted illegally in the presidential election, was arrested, fined $100, and she never paid the fine just to express her civil disobedience against the government for not letting her and all other women vote. Eventually, the government gave into her, and many other women's, persistence and have all women the right to vote. Although many people of history were for civil disobedience people in the twenty-first century or even in the past may have/do disagree that civil disobedience is an outrageous act.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason for his quarrel with the government and the writing of Civil Disobedience was Thoreau’s refusal to pay taxes supporting slavery, getting him thrown in jail, but keeping his conscious clear. Thoreau believed that each man should act in a way that agreed with their morals and not that of the government, especially if the government makes you violate your core beliefs…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Vs Mlk

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout American history, more often than not, our attention is drawn to the more violent attempts at making change. While some of these brutal attempts at liberation have come to be successful, violence is certainly not something we should have to resort to in order to see eye-to-eye. In the past, plenty of leaders have discovered the effect of non-violent protest, disobeying laws to prove a point. Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. are two of plenty people who share this philosophy, though they are greatly credited with paving the way for this mentality. Within their own pieces, “Civil Disobedience” (penned by Thoreau) and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” (by MLK), they share many of the same techniques to further prove their…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Civil disobedience is defined as the refusal to obey the law in a non violent way. Examples include protest, marches, strikes, sit ins and more. Civil disobedience has a history of influencing change within a society. However, the participation of civil disobediences may also obstruct peace. Especially when everyone within the society shares similar views.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau proposes some ways through which one can withdraw their support from the government. For instance, Thoreau withdrew his support from the government by refusing to pay taxes. Thoreau’s nonpayment of taxes was not taken lightly. He was imprisoned and he felt no shame for it. As he affirms, “If a thousand men were not to pay their tax-bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood.”…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays