Civil Disobedience Impact On Society

Improved Essays
Civil disobedience can be defined as the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society. The reasons why peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society are that as long as one is willing to accept the consequences of their actions and there intentions are to peacefully change the law than it will have a positive affect on the society.

For example while Martin Luther King Jr. was protesting in Birmingham, Alabama he was arrested and went to jail in a letter he wrote in Birmingham jail he said "an unjust law is no law at all" he was protesting the treatment of blacks in Birmingham due to the Jim Crow laws. These laws segregated blacks and whites in most southern states. Although King broke the law he was willing to accept the consequences and he went to jail for his crimes. King's protests' eventually led to the abolishment of the Jim Crow laws. This had a positive impact on society because blacks had more rights
…show more content…
But that is not true politics is the art of compromising so after a law is created the public may not accept it and seek to protest it or have it changed. This is why in addition to making the law, lawmakers also create a penalty for breaking that particular law. For example say the speed limit on the highway is seventy miles per hour according to the law but someone is travelling at ninety-five miles per hour. They will be pulled over and receive a ticket for speeding because they broke the law. Same thing applies to laws brooking during civil disobedience one breaks them they go to jail. But if the law is unjust being arrested for breaking it will bring attention to it and may eventually lead to it being

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Federalist 51, James Madison declared “the people [to be] the fountain of all authority.” As the “Father of the Constitution”, James Madison was largely responsible for the First Amendment, which declared that “Congress shall make no law … abridging … the right of the people peaceably to assemble.” While creating the framework for America’s new society, James Madison endowed Americans with the right and duty to gather and express themselves. These First Amendment freedoms are the highest forms of resistance protected by the Constitution.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rules are meant to be broken; but should “Unjust” laws be broken, if those laws target a particular group? Given that rules and laws have a similar meaning, rules are more like instructions whereas; laws are more of a system that regulates and ensure that individuals or a community adhere to the will of the state. While some laws are justifiable, some are clearly unfair therefore, causing controversy. Both Martin Luther King. Jr and Dwight Okita sheds light on unjust laws, that are created to degrade specific groups in America.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s modern society, peacefully resisting to unjust laws is almost an everyday thing. All around the globe today, we see prime examples of nation’s citizens peacefully demonstrating their opinions and believes to their ruling governments. That being said, civil disobedience and peacefully resisting to laws positively impact a free society. By peacefully resisting, societies come together to achieve a common goal, which is to fight back against their ruling governments due to unjust and unfair laws that negatively impact the governed.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr said “An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment so as to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law”. Dr. King went to church as a child and learned about civil disobedience and what was wrong from right in times of doubt. Although his practices were focused on the lord, most of his decisions were non-Christian based. Dr. King made his big speech August 28, 1963 called “I Have a dream”. Martin Luther King disagreed with civil disobedience because he believed that riots were a way to speak without speaking.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau were both advocates for and against using civil disobedience to inflict change. Civil disobedience is using nonviolent actions to to induce a change in the world. While it is effective in some situation, in others it is just as ineffective as talking to a wall. It is up to the people to decide if change is necessary and if they need to stand up for themselves against the governments or the oppressing parties. How they decide to handle each event is based on different variables.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    During the 1950’s and 60’s in the United States, the quest for equal rights was unfortunately just growing out of its infancy. Spearheading this effort was the renowned minister Martin Luther King Junior. While protesting in Birmingham, Alabama, King was arrested on the charge of parading without a permit and detained in the local jail. During his less than luxurious stay, he wrote his “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. The purpose of this message was to clearly lay out the process, display the importance, and illustrate the demand for Nonviolent Direct Action when negotiating civil rights for the non-white citizens of Birmingham; he additionally argues that one must take caution when carrying out civil disobedience, and that both of these forms of protest require courage and more importantly incredible discipline.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As time goes on, freedom is progressed and changed. The government will not recognize that its laws and standards are outdated and no longer “free” until a large group acts. For example, America’s Woman’s Suffrage movement presumably would have failed without civil disobedience. Groups seeking to reform by using civil disobedience, like the suffragettes, accepted and even welcomed arrest. The suffragettes strove to be seen as political prisoners instead of criminals, and this brought attention and popularity to their cause.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people would agree that laws are something that were created to help people. Most of the help is figuring out who is right, how to handle something, or rules to follow (Behl, 2016). Hardly anyone would argue that this is a bad thing, until the law itself breaks the rules. Many laws can, in fact, contradict themselves. An example of this is the juvenile justice system and being able to wave the juvenile to adult court.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Unjust

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Acting accordingly to those beliefs may result in consequences that often can't be controlled. However, an act of disobedience towards a law one deems as unjust may result in a positive change…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil disobedience is a highly controversial subject, and I understand why. There is a huge difference between Martin Luther King Jr, and the riots that are going on right now because Donald Trump got elected as President. Dr. King's protests were peaceful and did not interrupt everyday life, even though he felt strongly about the subject. The protesters now are disrupting the streets and are committing arson and other crimes (such as burning the flag-which is illegal). Dr. King got a lot further getting societal support using his peaceful protests than these anti-Trump protesters are by burning things and hurting people.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peaceful Resistance

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Peaceful resistance positively affects our society, despite the negative actions that may be unjustly inflicted on those participating in civil disobedience. Peaceful resistance against a law does not harm another individual or infringe on another's rights. According to Henry David Thoreau, "[a]ll men recognize the right to revolution... the right to refuse allegiance to, and to resist, the government, when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and unendurable," a statement that outlines when it is acceptable to break the law peaceably. Acts of civil disobedience are intended to draw attention to an issue and generate a political or social conversation in order to eventually bring justice to the protester in question, such as Rosa Parks' decision to remain in the "whites only" section of a Montgomery bus in 1955. While peaceful resistance does not always have its desired affect or bring about the change desired, many peaceful movements have been able to succeed, perhaps not on the legislative level, but on the moral battleground.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The denotative meaning of civil disobedience is the refusal to obey laws as a way of forcing the government to do or change something. That "something" is usually a law or policy; but, in reality, how effective is civil disobedience by everyday citizens? Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? The answer is not as clear cut as one might think; indeed, the results of civil disobedience are oftentimes subjective. On December 1, 1955, 42 year old Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on a Montgomery, Alabama, bus to a white man.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert O’Connor Concord High School New Hampshire Like many things in life, civil disobedience, is all a matter of perspective. Whether it be the Great Muhammad Ali peacefully opposing his selection for the draft or Rosa Parks literally sitting down instead of standing up for what is right on a bus ride home, each and every case of civil disobedience has its ups and downs. Though, when talking about basic human rights, there is no room to be neutral, and that is why peaceful resistance to laws most certainly impacts a society positively. From an optimistic perspective, everything will be alright in the end. Despite Ali’s…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is justified to break the law, particularly when the law being broken is unjust and immoral. An example of unjust and corrupt laws is the laws made in Nazi Germany. (King, 4) Plenty of these laws obliged people to report Jews for them to be terminated from Society. To oppose and break Nazi’s manmade law and help the Jews would be the moral and right thing to do. As a result, I assume that the only answer to the question of when is it justifiable to break a law is when that law violates more fundamental laws that maintain key human rights.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Am I jus for my disobedient acts? I must be jus for each one that I have ever committed. Civil disobedience is a fracture within the law therefore there must a relishable reason to be disobedient. Yet the reason to go against the state would be due to negligence. Justice is associated with the concept of everything plays a natural role, coming from Feinberg and Gross.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays