History Of Civil Disobedience

Superior Essays
There were many times in history when breaking the law has been justified. Great men like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King broke the law and changed the world to a better one. However, there are numerous philosophers that have argued that because it involves breaking the law, civil disobedience needs special justification. In this paper I will argue how an act of civil disobedience would be valid when a person goes against their country’s laws to do the right thing. First I will discuss what Socrates says about civil disobedience in Plato’s Crito and what I think about it. Second, I will say and clarify why civil disobedience is justifiable when doing the right thing. I will also explain what civil disobedience is as I understand it, …show more content…
For instance, when the government allows a wrong law to go by and this law is against our ethics and what we believe, are we supposed to just let this pass? Don’t we have the right to do something about it? We can take a few examples from history. We have learned from history that in the past there were laws against women, such as the law that said that women were not permitted to vote. Laws like this one were unjust and unfair against women. The same happened with the laws that allowed slavery, and segregation. These laws were all against someone or a specific group of people, and all together they were morally wrong. Civil Disobedience corrected these laws that were unfair and brought justice not only to the United States of America, but also to the entire world. As a result, we can see why civil disobedience is absolutely appropriate when other methods do not seem to work as one wants to do the right thing and correct the …show more content…
Many great philosophers like Socrates where against civil disobedience since it involved breaking the law, which caused Socrates to die for an unfair cause and left his family without a father and his country without a great and wise man. Throughout history we have seen how great man like Martin Luther King and Mahatma Gandhi made acts of civil disobedience for the sake of stopping the unjust. Even though these men lives ended in tragedy, the result of their acts were beneficial to entire nations and to the whole world. Civil disobedience is a peaceful act, and is not intended to harm but to undo what is wrong in order to make our society a better one. Disobeying an unjust law is justifiable as long as it is in a non-violent way. We have no obligation to obey a law that violates our rights, and we have the right to act against it if is necessary in order to do what is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, although a person has a responsibility to follow state laws in exchange for experiencing the advantages of residing in that state, such a convention does not include unfair laws as they are proscribed. Lastly, civil disobedience may counteract the greater iniquity of repression thus it is a public benefit in such instances (Olsen 220). There is nothing to lose with civil disobedience because if the majority opinion is not changed by civil disobedience, justice and stability remains sustained. However, civil disobedience strengthens the possibility of improvement. If no one defies a law, then there will be no means to determine if the law is perhaps…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil disobedience is defined as members of a community choosing to actively disobey laws in protest of a cause. As proponents of civil disobedience, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi advocated for those following their causes to complete acts disregarding unjust laws put in place to draw attention to their separate causes. This method of fighting for a cause emphasizes understanding of the necessity for change, that people are actively defying the law to draw attention to the unfair systems in place. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. used this to promote his movement of racial equality as compared with Gandhi’s movement for the separation of India from Britain. Both of their similar philosophies resulted in a degree of success, “the peaceful…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    4) Martin Luther King explained the term of his action called “Civil disobedience”. And it is nothing new. As reference the Bible, he gives the example of the refusal of some Jews to listen the law of Nebuchadnezzar which was unconfirmed to the religious and ethical law. In the same way that some Christians refused to listen to the unjust law to the Roman empire. This civil disobedience leads to the creation of academy freedom a degree due to the civil disobedience of Socrates.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Dbq

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As we take a look at the history of the United States, impacting a free society has not been easy. There have been many laws that have not treated everyone fairly. In order to impact a free society, many had to undergo civil disobedience in order to impact the free society that we live in today. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society. Without civil disobedience, it would have been almost impossible to make change in our society.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that civil disobedience to laws negatively impacts the free society, whether there is harm or no harm done it still negatively impacts the free society. Thomas Jefferson believed "If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so." He states this not in a speech but paraphrases it in the declaration of independence it is okay to disobey the law. He says “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government...,". Jefferson is completely with the fact that civil disobedience positively impacts the free society.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau were both advocates for and against using civil disobedience to inflict change. Civil disobedience is using nonviolent actions to to induce a change in the world. While it is effective in some situation, in others it is just as ineffective as talking to a wall. It is up to the people to decide if change is necessary and if they need to stand up for themselves against the governments or the oppressing parties. How they decide to handle each event is based on different variables.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malcom X, an American Muslim Minister and rights activist, once said that “You are not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you cannot face reality. Wrong is wrong, no matter who says it.” He is speaking of a term called civil disobedience, the active refusal to obey certain laws, demands, and commands of the government, or of an occupying international power. Civil disobedience is used by influential “rebels” all over the world and throughout history. Many people have different opinions on whether civil disobedience is important or not.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil disobedience is the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences. Looking at American history, it is clear for many to see that peaceful resistance is a core aspect in forcing change to occur ie. women’s suffrage, civil rights, anti war, gay rights, the labor movement, and etc. Without peaceful resistance, change would not occur. Change is rooted in the shadows of peaceful resistance, it’s what has never failed this country in making a difference.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society as it promotes the creation and the retention of a free country. Free societies are often considered more advanced than the oppressive ones because freedom is something that evolved out of oppression. Now, in the modern world, governments are more or less established, and for them to be changed, the people must act. Civil disobedience is woven through the fabric of the United States. The Revolutionary war granted the underdog colonies independence-- not just independence but freedom.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I, personally, believe that civil disobedience is extremely effective and in the end produces a positive effect. In order for the movement to be effective, it has to directly affect a group or several groups of people. When these people feel that their rights or interests aren't being protected or violated, then they make a stand. Those who are gaining from their demise view these people with criticism or call their movement useless or a "threat to society." Back in the 1800s Henry David Thoreau wrote Civil Disobedience.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience have a much more powerful movement then does violence. It was used during the civil rights movement by Martin Luther King, during the Vietnam war, and lastly Gandhi for freedom from the British. In On the Duty of Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau “the soldier is applauded who refuses to serve in an unjust war by those who do not refuse to sustain the unjust government which makes the war.” Thoreau was talking about the Mexican American War but in context of protesting for racial profiling the one that protest for the right of the good and stop kill and practice racial profiling. Civil disobedience is form of protest that has been successfully used across history for the greater good and man of the times it works.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The denotative meaning of civil disobedience is the refusal to obey laws as a way of forcing the government to do or change something. That "something" is usually a law or policy; but, in reality, how effective is civil disobedience by everyday citizens? Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? The answer is not as clear cut as one might think; indeed, the results of civil disobedience are oftentimes subjective. On December 1, 1955, 42 year old Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on a Montgomery, Alabama, bus to a white man.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert O’Connor Concord High School New Hampshire Like many things in life, civil disobedience, is all a matter of perspective. Whether it be the Great Muhammad Ali peacefully opposing his selection for the draft or Rosa Parks literally sitting down instead of standing up for what is right on a bus ride home, each and every case of civil disobedience has its ups and downs. Though, when talking about basic human rights, there is no room to be neutral, and that is why peaceful resistance to laws most certainly impacts a society positively. From an optimistic perspective, everything will be alright in the end. Despite Ali’s…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As political philosopher Montesquieu puts it “the spirit of the law is justice. The letter must be broken at some points to achieve it.” Justice is defined in the dictionary as being consistent with what is morally right. Unfortunately, what is considered as legal is not always consistent with what is morally right. For sure, a huge amount of laws are made to ensure that people have their fundamental human rights, safety, equality and freedom.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    History is riddled with instances of civil disobedience. Most would agree that, for some issues, it is required to change a law that is unjust. Even in a society that established a democracy as far back as its ideological conception, some issues seem to be only resolvable through decisive acts of insubordination. A valid point that is often times raised is: what is the point of a democracy if some issues have to be solved through civil disobedience? More specifically, this point is the centerpiece of Lewis H. Van Dusen, Jr.’s essay titled “Civil Disobedience: Destroyer of Democracy.”…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays