Laws have become a very indispensable component of every human society and the relevance of laws can never be undermined. Laws are made in a society for the preservation of that society by ensuring orderliness and peaceful co-existence of its members. It also guarantees the sovereignty of the state and its authority. Laws prescribe the conducts and behaviours of people within the society so as to ensure that every member of the society acts in accordance with the supreme interest of the society. Laws protect people, create social stability, and provide opportunities to create rights that people might not otherwise enjoy. The right to life, property, liberty and the pursuit of happiness need to be protected and defined by laws. Nonetheless,
…show more content…
First and foremost, there should be collection of facts; which involves the conducting of surveys and gathering of empirical data to prove that injustices are real and alive. Secondly, individuals should negotiate with authorities for the rectification of injustices by making normal appeal and other means for remediation. One can embark on civil disobedience only when legal protest has been unsuccessful. Thirdly, self-purification should be sought by individuals and this involves organizing workshops to sensitize people and also creating the awareness that civil disobedience should not be violent. Also it should be openly done and individual should bear in mind that they will readily accepts the consequences of their actions. Lastly, Martin Luther says that last step to take is direct action. By direct action, he means that individual should do exactly what they have given notice to do and this will necessarily open doors for negotiations.
By critically analysing argument from both sides, I can humbly and emphatically say that I share in the view of Martin Luther King and his defence for disobeying unjust laws. This is because, morality or conscience is inherently an aspect of human nature of which its relevance is not in doubt. Therefore, one’s actions and conduct must be guided by it in every situations to provide a sense of peace, well-being and sanity for one’s
First and foremost, there should be collection of facts; which involves the conducting of surveys and gathering of empirical data to prove that injustices are real and alive. Secondly, individuals should negotiate with authorities for the rectification of injustices by making normal appeal and other means for remediation. One can embark on civil disobedience only when legal protest has been unsuccessful. Thirdly, self-purification should be sought by individuals and this involves organizing workshops to sensitize people and also creating the awareness that civil disobedience should not be violent. Also it should be openly done and individual should bear in mind that they will readily accepts the consequences of their actions. Lastly, Martin Luther says that last step to take is direct action. By direct action, he means that individual should do exactly what they have given notice to do and this will necessarily open doors for negotiations.
By critically analysing argument from both sides, I can humbly and emphatically say that I share in the view of Martin Luther King and his defence for disobeying unjust laws. This is because, morality or conscience is inherently an aspect of human nature of which its relevance is not in doubt. Therefore, one’s actions and conduct must be guided by it in every situations to provide a sense of peace, well-being and sanity for one’s