City Of Ingleside Case Summary

Improved Essays
Territorial dispute between the City of Ingleside and the City of Corpus Christi in Texas resulted in a lawsuit to establish the adjacent bay waters’ “shoreline” as the common border. Ingleside sought clarification by filing a declaratory-judgment. Ingleside believed that several piers, bulkheads, wharves, and artificial structures affixed to Ingleside’s shore and therefore The City of Ingleside believed part of the land was within their jurisdiction. However, due to the balance of power between the state government and the judicial branch, the court of appeals dismissed the case because they felt they lacked jurisdiction declaring the issue as a political question. In this dispute, The City of Ingleside appealed and the case was granted a petition …show more content…
To begin, this conflict in court occurred mainly because the courts cannot declare a boundary, if they do that would amount to the judicial branch interfering with the legislative branch of Texas. This would be against the Texas constitution directing under article II sections 1 where, it provides that “one governmental branch may not exercise those powers committed to a coordinate branch”. In Tex. Ass’n of Bus. v. Tex. Air Control Bd. if a determination is constitutionally committed to the legislative branch’s discretion, the judiciary is not free to substitute its judgment for that of the legislative branch. It is clear why the lower court dismissed this case as a political question since it did not want to breach the balance of the institutions. However, the constitution also mentions in vague language, “except in the instances herein expressly permitted”. The Supreme Court of Texas agreed, but in this specific dispute, it pertains to the jurisdictional boundaries of home-rule municipalities like Ingleside and Corpus Christi, not a decision to annex

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Facts and holding Warren McCleskey and three other furnished men ransacked the Dixie Furniture Store in Atlanta, Georgia, on May 13, 1978. Amid the burglary, Officer Frank Schlatt entered the front of the store and was lethally shot in the face. Nobody really saw the slaughtering. After McCleskey's capture regarding another outfitted theft, he admitted to the Atlanta hold-up, yet denied shooting Officer Schlatt. In any case, immediate and incidental confirmation indicated McCleskey as the triggerman.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wurbs mainly describes a general background of both surface water rights and groundwater rights. Notably, the vast majority of information given is about the Edwards aquifer, among which are the crucial facts that San Antonio, one of the biggest cities of Texas, solely relies on it for water, and that most Texans do not want the government to interfere with the groundwater they own. In general, this attitude toward groundwater rights is probably related to the dominance in Texas of the limited-government political party, the Republicans. Additionally, some important precedents to Edwards Aquifer Authority V. Day are given, like Sierra Club v. Babbitt. In it, the Sierra Club accused the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for not sufficiently protecting the San Marcos and Comal aquifers’ (both Texan) endangered species.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sacramento County Analysis Sacramento County Alcohol and Drug Treatment Initiative faced many challenges during the implementation process. Bob Caulk and Toni Moore struggled with their staff at Department of Health and Human Services being unwilling to implement and apply the skills from AODTI, for fear of the increased workload and resistance to change. DHHS middle-managers chose not to attend the AODTI training sessions, were not invested in the project, and did not take step to implement the program into their department. Moore became aware that the DHHS staff was not knowledgeable about the AODTI. AODTI team held seminar geared toward middle and top-level management.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The paper ends the discussion on the significant changes that occurred following the Supreme Court decision, both for himself, UT, and future Texas…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Quincy Adams Dbq

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The treaty was amended twice, once in 1831 and again in 1835. After the Republic of Texas became independent from Mexico, the US and Texas signed an 1828 treaty confirming the boundary from the Treaty of Limits. This led to Mexico regarding it as a violation and ultimately leading to the Mexican-American War. After the war, the Treaty of Guadalupe replaced the Treaty of Limits. In United States v. Texas (1896), the US Supreme Court decided that the Adams-Onís Treaty and the Treaty of Limits set the boundaries between Texas and the Oklahoma Territory of the…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Jim Ferguson Essay

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Texas has had a colorful political past. James and Miriam Ferguson also known as "Ma" and "Pa" Ferguson were one of the most influential couples in Texas History. Both served as Governor of Texas during the early part of the 1900's. During this time Texans saw an expansion of public education, voter intimidation, public misconduct, Prohibition, the depression and ultimately impeachment of a governor. This essay compares an article taken from the “Record of Proceedings of the High Court of Impeachment on the Trial of Hon.”…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With just these four different departs, you can see that the United States and the Texas Constitution have a lot more differences than some of us actually even thought. The differences between the two can keep going on and on for the fact that they were made for two completely different reasons. It just goes to show that the states can set higher level standards than the national government in certain places. These two constitutions both have their own form of way to get the things they want across to the many people they decide they want to get them across to. Even though one way may be different from the other everything still goes the way it needs to go and how it's supposed to go, of course with a little bump in the road sometimes.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The power is divided among statewide elected officials of other states (Braden: 1977). These and other factors stress the need to rewrite the Texas Constitution. This leads the executive branch members to enviously protect their jurisdiction and power and undermines the group effort to govern Texas. PART II:…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prison Gerrymandering

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first district found that the City of Cranston had not violated the Equal Protection Clause. In a sense, prison gerrymandering legal under Evenwel v. Abbott. Prison Gerrymandering is “the practice of counting incarcerated people as residents of prisons when drawing electoral districts” (Davidson v. City). This case has many contradictions to the rule of law including multiple factors. The first main infringement is 1.1 “government powers are effectively limited by the fundamental law”.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The idea of what makes someone American comes down to the belief in three rights; life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Americans have rallied behind these inherent rights to form a strong unified nation. In Thomas Bender’s book, A Nation Among Nations, he argues in his chapter, Freedom in the Age of Nation-Making, that 19th century political thinkers believed that an overlapping “space of decision” and “space of culture” was the best way to form national unity and protect the individual liberties of citizens. The “space of decision” is the government established by the people of a nation and the “space of culture” are values and belief systems of the people of a nation. In relation to the Civil War of the United States, the institution…

    • 1074 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Territorial Expansion DBQ

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One side felt Texas could “increase the wealth and happiness of all classes in our society” (Doc G) and believed “all this patriotism ¬-all this philanthropy -all this religion- appeals to us in favor of the addition of Texas to our Union” (Doc G). On the other hand, the opponents knew that “we are anxious to force free government on all” (Doc H) but only under “a very high state of moral and intellectual improvement, in a civilized state” (Doc H) is the nation able maintain a free government and form “a constitution capable of endurance” (Doc H).…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was America justified in going to war with Mexico? Before April 25, 1846, American you know today wasn't the same If America didn’t go to war with Mexico, American would only be half of the size it was today. This all started because Texas declared its independence from Mexico. Mexico wasn’t so thrilled about Texas actions. Which, leads to the question, was America justified to war with Mexico?…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction The case study involves Hernandez versus Texas this was a Mexican – American civil right case which was recorded as the first one. The case was listened by States Supreme Court this was after the Second World War. Historically it was around 1950. The case was involved murder the named Pete Hernandez who was a cotton picker was accused of killing Joe Espinosa. They were no Mexican who has served on the jury for more than twenty-five years.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Immigration In Texas Essay

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Long before the current situation, Texas had immigration issues but in contrasting form. Immigration in Texas during the 1830s consisted of “white, English-speaking Americans who were looking for a better life in Texas. And the authorities who were trying to keep them out were Mexican” (Root, 2012). Centuries later this situation evolved into the illegal immigration issue that Texas is dealing with today. What makes this situation more of a controversy now than before is the vast numbers of illegal immigrants seeking a new beginning in Texas and the limited economic resources that are available to support them.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While America began to expand and become more industrialize, not everybody agreed with the ideas and concepts. Due to the difference in opinion there was a lot of controversy and voiced opinions about the westward expansions. While some Americans supported Westward expansions, there was others who opposed Westward expansions. Also some Americans supported the Mexican War, while others opposed the Mexican war. However, both the Westward expansion and the Mexican war had positive and negative effects to the country we live in today.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays