Citizenship In Ancient Rome

Improved Essays
Citizenship is a status given by a government to some or all of its people. Rome gave citizenship to most of its people, whereas Athens gave citizenship very few of its people. The Roman government was more lenient to its population 45,000,000 people. The Roman government had a system set up for those who were foreigners and wanted to become citizens. The Romans may have been lenient, but they had limits for citizens too. Along with their limits they had a social structure within the government to keep everything running smoothly. Athenian citizenship was hard to come by they gave it away to very few types of people. The Athenian government worked hard to get its citizens out of its population of 300,000 people to focus on using their rights …show more content…
The senate contained about 300 men who would serve life long terms, if the census did not prove they were not fit to be in the Senate. The 300 men in the Roman Senate had responsibilities for controlling foreign relations,making treaties,war policy, creating alliances, control of public land,selecting ambassadors and trying cases for treason and conspiracy (Document F painting by: Cesare Maccari). The Roman Republic still managed to set aside rules for those who wanted to be citizens and were foreigners. People such as, Latini's, Foderati's, and Perrini's were foreigners from conquered lands, from foreign lands, but lived in the Italian peninsula, or citizens of states that had a treaty with Rome( Document c by: Claudius and other sources). The Roman republic was not as open or public as the Athenian Democracy. The Senate seat in Rome was passed down and their meeting was more formal than the Athenian …show more content…
The way citizens were ranked, were based upon many factors. These such factors would include wealth, heritage, marital status, administrative competence, and psychical and moral fitness. The censors could determine if you were to be demoted in rank. The senators were not excused from the census either, if they were demoted, they could be expelled from their senate position. This census occurred every five years, and helped determine what right/privileges, level of taxation, and what duties citizens were to preform until the next census. This system was well organized and planned, because it was well thought out it allowed the government to keep track of its citizens. Thus keeping the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The group of men in the Roman Senate were responsible for war policy, controlling lands, government decisions and making laws. The Roman government benefited from the Roman Senate because the Senate kept there government stable. In the Roman Senate there were only 300 men, which is a very small number of…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Greese Vs Roman Senate

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Pages

    It was very hard to be in the Roman senate because you would have to inherit your spot from a family member who also was part of the senate. This form of law passing and decision making was better than the greek…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If this is truly the case, then the reason for refusing senatorial status may lie in the equestrians’ greater role in administration. Moreover, Brunt asserts that senators and equestrians alike could engage in trade, manufacture and moneylending activities which appears to disprove the assertion that they refused the rank due to the loss of ability to conduct business. Aspiring Romans merely had to look at the previous principes and Sejanus’ term to see that equestrians could play a key role in state governance. In all, it is clear…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristocratic Elites

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    From the Republic’s inception to the Western Empire’s demise the aristocratic elite believed they were Rome’s best men and were therefore the only ones truly suited to lead. It was they who rid Rome of the Etruscan Emperor, after which they assumed the mantle of “preservers of [Rome’s] sacred tradition.” Later, like the Greeks, the Roman elite developed a constitutional government, “which paralleled the Greek achievement of rationalizing and secularizing politics and law.” This constitution was not democratic like that of the Greeks; instead, it established a republic and, though there were eventually three assemblies, the Senate, made up of aristocrats, who were appointed for life by consuls who themselves were aristocratic elites, was very much…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Any child born to senators were automatically classified as Equestrians which means civil servants until they gained necessary age or experience. Not only could a child gain the ruling of Rome, but a close relative of their choice could as well be a heir if something were to happen to them. Emperors were usually so focused on keeping the Emperors throne within their family, they would sometime choose heirs that were not fit for ruling a whole empire. In the ranks of government, there was a widespread favoritism in making public appointments based on class1. Within the aristocratic ruling families, the men were taught art of public speaking and Roman law2.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Save The Roman Republic

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages

    However, none of this would matter if it was all for the common good of Rome and to save the republic, except there wasn’t a true republic to save. Most of the senators were in their position of power because of their families and their wealth. Consequently some of the senators looked down upon the citizens such as when Casca said “if Caesar had stabbed their mothers, they would’ve forgiven him”(I,ii,269-270) to criticize the people of Rome. Their similar backgrounds likely meant that they rarely had opposing viewpoints. The Roman people did not have the same background as the senators and, the citizens’ views were rarely properly represented by these senators.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Equites could also become a part of the Senatorial class by being elected into the magistracy, but it was uncommon due to the difficulty. The Senatorial was primarily a political class. Senatores are referred to as the members of the Senatorial class. The Senatorial class was based upon a certain amount of wealth and being apart of the Senate. Senatores were clothed in laticlavi, which were similar to angusti clavi, but had red-purple broad stripes as opposed to narrow stripes.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Pericles citizenship law, did more and affected the woman of Athens even more with negative appearance for them and made their life worse than before. All because of the Pericles citizenship law, it’s all started because Pericles and is motion of his own law. And that law was “that he had proposed a law that only those who could claim Athenian parentage on both sides could be counted as Athenian citizens . In other words, citizenship was no longer to be heredity purely on the male side, and although women would not gain the benefits of citizenship, their status would now aect whether or not their sons became citizens.” so basically to end up by getting your sons to be citizens the mother and father of that child must have had to be…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    which reflected their social class and therefore power and how much control they had in the ancient Roman society. Then if the dead person had any military rewards or crowns then they would get carried out to show their achievements that they had made during their lifetime. Eventually the corpse was then carried out on the couch; the body was usually carried out on the eighth day after death. If the body was cremated then the ashes would be placed into an urn (a small clay jar) and the urn would be placed into the tomb, located outside the city walls.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    First, one of the main political conflicts of the movie was whether to disband the senate or to give the power back to it. The senate was seen as a people’s tool for governing even after the fall of the Republic. It’s best explained by Gracchus before one of the gladiator fights, “I don’t claim to be a man of the people,…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Direct Democracy Dbq

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Athenian government was a direct democracy, meaning the citizens of the city-state had a say in the decisions they made. Although the government was based on direct democracy, only adult males could vote. The Athenians had the power to change anything in their government due to having direct democracy. This could take a turn at any time since it was a direct democracy, which could lead to some people cheating the vote. In Athens, they valued the individual over the group.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic was in control of many regions and not all of these inhabitants were delighted with the current circumstances, especially the citizens in Rome. During the period of the expansion of Rome, the government was becoming less democratic and started displaying signs of an oligarchy. The Senate of the Roman Republic was the prime branch of government. This was comprised of leaders from the patricians, the noble, and wealthy families of ancient Rome. Members of the senate were not elected but were chosen by the Consuls.2 The senate’s main task was to direct spending and verdicts associating with foreign powers.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Senators in Rome would utilize propaganda just as political candidates in the United States do. Portrait of Augustus as general…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Roman Empire Analysis

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What was valued in the history was Senate set in the early Rome Republic. Senate, as a basic political organization of Republic, consisted of 300 members coming from aristocratic families. Though it looked that the whole state was in the hand of aristocrats by sharing the seats of Senate, it was not true, and the function of Senate is giving advice to the Consuls and Praetors. The right of choosing Consuls and Praetors was controlled by the normal people with some popular assemblies, for example, the Comitia Centuriata. It was organized by people in army units and could elect the Consuls (Alcock, 2002: 19).…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roman Economy Essay

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The leaders of Rome were not just concerned about direct economics, they were also concerned with the laws of economics. Roman law prohibited senators from getting into trade and business. This allowed for the members of the Senate to completely focus on necessary laws, and ensured that the Senators’ decisions did not interfere with their investments. Although this law existed, the rich still controlled the…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays