Citizen Americans Should Have The Right To Vote Essay

Improved Essays
The concept of selling one’s vote, while technically free exchange and perceived as beneficial for both parties, should not be allowed in America because it encourages a lack of virtue and responsibility which is essential for America’s government. Moreover, a vote is not just about self-interest in terms of short-term monetary return. A system that is based only on momentary gain cannot be sustained in the long-run. In voting, we have a duty to preserve the voting system itself for our own future and for generations to come; auctioning that right to the highest bidder undermines every other component of the system that supports the right to vote to begin with.
Society is built on a balance between individual rights and the public good. While the concept of selling votes promotes individual rights, the practice damages the idea of the people’s virtue. Because the government receives its authority by the consent of the people, citizens need to feel responsible for the outcome of government. Their votes are essential to the system. By exchanging their duty to the country for some form of self-interest—whether direct monetary compensation or promised benefits—citizens selling their votes degrade the moral system in which America’s foundation stands. The government and the people are directly correlated in that by
…show more content…
Since citizens and the government are dependent on each other to work effectively, it can be interpreted that the importance of this organization lies beyond the individual and rests with the public. The public’s job, as a whole, is to promote a somewhat utilitarian perspective of producing the most good for the most people while not trampling on the inalienable rights of the individual. Thus the obligation of voting for representatives is an individual’s duty to both the government and the body of citizens in America in return for the individual’s rights in other

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    All citizens of the United States have, at one point or another, been taught that America is a nation founded on the principles of a democratic society. Principles that, forged in the crucible of war, endow it citizens with an undeniable right to directly participate in the political process. America’s Forefathers would be profoundly disappointed, however, to learn that the unchecked influence of special interest has sullied the very fabric of United States politics. The Founding Fathers, in spite of their boundless knowledge, had not the foresight to see just how easily monetary influence would try the fortitude of their burgeoning political system. The effects of their unknowingness permeate throughout the United States government; yet still the American people are seemingly unware of – or perhaps altogether unmoved by – the astonishing amount of money being funneled into the political machine, let alone the identities of those making such remarkable donations.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his crafty article “Wo(e)begon(e) Democracy,” Michael Lienesch details his argument against John Mueller’s “Democracy and Ralph’s Pretty Good Grocery,” which provides the reader with Lienesch’s arguments against Mueller’s view on democratic governments, and also the importance of citizenship in democratic governments. Mueller’s views on democratic governments touch more on the philosophical side, seeing democracy as a simple form of government, also believing that democracy requires citizens to be perpetually self-sacrificing. Lienesch’s argument begins with him criticizing Mueller for only seeing the democratic system from a philosophical point of view, detailing that he should see things from a political point of view. When answering Mueller’s argument that democracies require citizens to be self-sacrificing, Lienesch explains that a democracy does have costs, and citizens have to pay for them. (Lienesch, 1012)…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Neither Tocqueville nor the authors of the Federalist Papers view an enlightened and virtuous citizenry as wholly essential to the Constitutional system, but while the federalists build institutions to defend the government against the self-interested passions of the people, Tocqueville sees the greatest benefits of the American political system where the government and the people meet: in the township and in political associations. The Federalists believe that the core of the Constitution system’s success lies in its institutions rather than the people. Their writings repeatedly show doubt in the abilities of the public to govern, construct institutions to defend against their involvement, limiting their civic duties to elections. Tocqueville,…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Woodrow Wilson faces problems of the United States Wilson thought that the government was having privacy problems, that there was too much government involved in big businesses, that the tariff was too high and was causing Americans to lose money, and that the United States was stuck in a cycle when it came to government. To fix these problems he wanted to bring the government back to the people of the United States, he wanted to bring back competition to solve government involvement and the tariffs, and he wanted people to stand up for themselves and vote for who they actually want in the elections. Wilson had many other problems and solutions in his book but theses were some of the main ones that stuck out to me. During Woodrow Wilson’s…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In America, citizens are given the right to vote and elect officials into office. At the age of eighteen, young adults are allowed to register to vote and take part in elections. Not all citizens participate and decide to vote. When Americans decide to exclude themselves from voting, they initially are negatively impacting society. Thomas Patterson takes his stance on this when he wrote “The Vanishing Voter”.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Voting System In Canada

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Our current representative democracy gives citizens the right to vote under a free electoral system. Frequently seen as right rather than an obligation, not all citizens take part in the election. Therefore, not making an appearance can dramatically effect our political system causing an unfair election. Other countries to avoid unfair democracy have obtained for compulsory voting; eg. Brazil, Australia and Austria.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political campaigns within our contemporary generation are considered to be expensive affairs, as they have opened doors for the monetary system within the United States to coincide with the election process significantly affecting the decisions made within the political realm. Moreover, the presence of money within the U.S political landscape has become a political norm as individuals within the electoral process are granted the freedom to “buy” treatment within the favor of the candidates (Sidlow and Henschen 211). The contribution of money within the political system implies the idea of the electoral process having been turned into a “corporate” business. However, limitations set by the government through the enforcement of laws are in existence…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    To say one is a democrat, is often an action without thought, but when said thought is applied, whether or not one are a democrat becomes a question much easier asked than answered; there is a great deal of thought that must go in to giving that question an educated response. Kristen Ross goes against the societal grain, and expresses that for various reasons she is not. Her essay gives a well research explanation as to why she feels such a way, providing the reader with valuable insight on her uncommon opinion. The value of voting, a modern day staple in any democracy, is criticized for its purpose. It is pointless to ask the opinion of the people only to tell them that they have given the wrong answer and must revote.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vega 1 Breanna Vega Professor Olmos English 101 23 April 2016 Citizens Rule Democracy is known to be a strong form of government, because it gives full power to the people of the nation. Many argue about how a democracy works, but do not understand it includes difficult tasks for it to be successful. In Cornel West’s reading, “The Deep Democratic Tradition in America,” the idea of a strong democracy is by the people, but the promise of a democracy has failed. In order to keep the promise of strong democracy individual practices such as voting rights, the principle of protection, and the representation of each individual must be practiced under no circumstances.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although compulsory voting has not been implemented in many democratic governments, those that have adopted its method show very high voter turn out. Since 1924, Australia has been a leading example of how efficient mandatory voting can be when implemented properly. Mandatory voting has many benefits that would not only aid the political system of ones country, but also countless other factors such as economics, foreign policy, and the general will of the people. Obama has even considered instituting this type of policy in the very free and democratic United States of America stating, “…mandatory voting would empower these groups and counteract the influence of big money in elections…”[Josephine Tovey]. With a compulsory voting law in place…

    • 1100 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    Blum, Edward. The Unintended Consequences of Section 5 of the Voting Rights . Washington, D.C.: AEI Press, 2007. 88. Print. 4.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should American Citizens be required to vote Throughout the years, many citizens have fought for the right to vote. Citizens of other countries view the United States as being lucky just to have the opportunity to help choose the person who will be in charge of our country or to help decide how our constitution will be amended. American citizens should be able to vote for many reasons,first being U.S. citizens are the voice of America and are our future leaders and drive the political process. The second reason mandatory voting should be require is because it can get American citizens involved in the government, and lastly mandatory voting will sustain a democratic government. I believe that American Citizens should be able to vote for many reasons, one of the reasons that American citizens should be required to vote is the simple fact that American citizens are the voice of America and without our voices this country would have no one to represent us as a whole; the American Citizens represent the American population.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keeping the Peace – Responsibility for Insuring Domestic Tranquility in the United States Insure domestic tranquility is one of the most important clauses in the Preamble to the Constitution because it provides an overriding guideline about the importance of keeping peace within the United States. The United States’ founding fathers defined this phrase as the promise to run the country will be run as perfectly as can be. Domestic tranquility means no fighting between the states and peace in the public. A better understanding of who controls this theme has evolved throughout the country’s history. Although the general public had some power in issues in the country, the idea of insuring domestic tranquility evolved from the people responsible for keeping the country calm and peaceful to the government taking over the responsibility because the government had more power and control than the people.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plurality Voting Analysis

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There is a lot of news regarding the state of voting in America. And I regret to say that it is not looking good. The 2012 election saw a 3% decrease in voter turnout, with only 58.2% of eligible voters turning up at the polls. Likewise, public approval of the government has plummeted, with Congressional approval hitting a new low of 9% in 2013. In the face of such political cynicism, it’s clear some kind of a solution is needed.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This critical response will be focusing on the article by author Lisa Björkman titled “You can’t buy a vote”. The author in this article analyzes Mumbai’s 2012 electoral process by directing ethnographic attention to Seema, a candidate running for the 2012 election in Mumbai, and her relationships with social workers and local leaders. Björkman’s main focus is on the flow of cash throughout the election campaign. It is believed that the election campaign participants partake in “vote buying”, which is when votes are deemed to be for sale and therefore campaign leaders exchange money to get votes. Björkman’s main argument is that gifts of money are similar to any other forms of gifted goods in creating relations of obligation and loyalty.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays