Circumcision Is Wrong Persuasive Essay

Circumcision has been around for hundreds of thousands of years. Many religions command their followers be circumcised while others practice the ancient tradition for the presumed health benefits. However, more and more parents opt out of for various reasons such as the health benefits are not proven and the process of circumcision is counter intuitive to the partners rule of not hurting their child. Parents are allowed to choose if their baby gets circumcised, but if their reasonings are such listed earlier, they are misguided and are incorrect. When someone is questioned if their circumcision was painful, they would say they don't remember the experience. This is because no one remembers their infanthood. Dr. Laven, a gynecologist, demonstrated the procedure step by step. Presumably, if she had focused just on the operation from start to finish, it would have lasted roughly twenty seconds. At one point in the interview, Dr. Laven even stated that the duration of the circumcision is around twenty to thirty seconds [Laven]. Such a short procedure validates the statement that it would not create long term pain for the baby. Also, circumcision has been a custom in many religions for many years. Tradition is a vital part within any …show more content…
In the documentary the mother breaks down in tears, feeling as if she had damaged the relationship between herself and her baby [Jewish Circumcision: Cutting with Tradition]. It is true that circumcisions do hurt the babies, however the pain is short lasting. The youtube video demonstrates this through the short time the baby was crying. It was conveyed that the parents strongly with circumcision more than the baby. Since the pain of circumcision seems to be brief and the procedure has been practiced on millions of people, a Brit Milah is not child abuse. It is a decision that the parents have the right to make for their