2. The logical fallacy of circular reasoning:
Beginning with what could be infinite regression, the infinite regression hooks up to itself in a circle of reasoning. Under those circumstances, the proof for one of the premises is one of the previous premises. In these cases, circular reasoning hides a problem with the premise.
Form: A proves B and B proves A.
Form: A proves B, B proves C, and C proves A.
Example: An ungodly thinker says her reasoning is to be trusted. But how does she know? Irrationally, she uses her reasoning to try to convince you that her reasoning is to be trusted.
3. The logical fallacy of axiomatic thinking:
Shameless, axiomatic thinking is just making up stuff and calling it true. In essence, axiomatic thinking is a
Beginning with what could be infinite regression, the infinite regression hooks up to itself in a circle of reasoning. Under those circumstances, the proof for one of the premises is one of the previous premises. In these cases, circular reasoning hides a problem with the premise.
Form: A proves B and B proves A.
Form: A proves B, B proves C, and C proves A.
Example: An ungodly thinker says her reasoning is to be trusted. But how does she know? Irrationally, she uses her reasoning to try to convince you that her reasoning is to be trusted.
3. The logical fallacy of axiomatic thinking:
Shameless, axiomatic thinking is just making up stuff and calling it true. In essence, axiomatic thinking is a