He uses numerous examples to describe cinematographic metaphor under ten subtypes, which are less wide ranging than those by Kennedy, but they still study metaphor in the narrow sense, including for instance metonymy and synecdoche. Carroll (1994) criticizes Whittock for failing to take into account what the latter considers the most typical variety of visual or cinematographic metaphor, the visual hybrid (see also Carroll 1996). Carroll, unlike Kennedy and Whittock, moreover argues that visual metaphors differ from verbal ones in often allowing for reversal of target and source.
Forceville is the representatives to study MM. Forceville (1996) distinguish four types of pictorial metaphor. Later, Forceville (2002) expanding on earlier works, gives a systematic clarification of MM. The four types are: “contextual metaphor”; “hybrid metaphor”; “simile” and “integrated metaphor”. Based on his early works, Forceville (2006) distinguishes multimodality and