In Tichenor, the court found substantial harm. Id. at 178. In Tichenor, the plaintiff’s were unable to perform yard work, plant flowers or enjoy their porch because of the volume of the dogs’ barks. Id. at 175. The court reasoned the volume of the noise was more than a slight inconvenience because a normal person should be able to use their property at will without being interrupted by a neighbor.…
3. First Amendment: Van Orden v. Perry case is about Orden suing Texas about a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of the state capital building. The question is does a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of a state capitol building violate the First Amendment’s establishment clause. The decision was it does not.…
PARTIES: P = Ensign and others D = Walls PRIOR HISTORY: Plaintiffs claimed that Defendant’s business constitutes a nuisance. Trial court enjoined defendant from continuing her business after 90 days. Defendant appealed. FACTS:…
The city approved a development plan designed to revitalize the ailing economy through its development agent, which purchased most of the property for the project. The city could not take the land to confer a private benefit for a single party, but the court had embraced a more broad and natural interpretation for public use as “public purpose” (Kelo). The city had determined that the area at issue was going to justify economic rejuvenation and was entitled to deference, which then the city had made the plans to what they thought would benefit the community as a whole. In entirety, the government cannot take private property unless the forfeiting of the property is for the public’s use and does not benefit another private…
1952 - Eisenhower vs Stevenson Eisenhower is well known for his leadership in D-Day and involvement in helping bring an end to the war in Europe against the Axis enemies giving him the status of a war hero. Due to his involvement and leadership, Eisenhower is well liked by the American public and his opinions on the war in Korea matters. In one campaign ad, he questions the funding on the National Defense by the Truman administration as there is a low supply of weapons for those overseas in Korea to even fight with. A vote for him would be a vote to finally end the war in Korea by someone with military knowledge. Eisenhower also speaks against the tax raises made by the Democratic party to compensate for the large amount of debt that was harmfully…
Francis Scott-Key and Francis Bellamy The United States (U.S.A) is the greatest country in the world. There is no doubt that the U.S.A. is. Both Francis Scott-Key (Star Spangled Banner) and Francis Bellamy (pledge of Allegiance) both wrote patriotic pieces of history. While some differences between Francis Scott-Key and Francis Bellamy are evident, their similarities are prominent.…
I do not think that Estes should be held responsible for the attacks against the gay men in Madison, Wisconsin unless it is proven that there is a direct connection between the act of the attackers and Estes’ sign. By this I mean actual proof that the attackers acted out against the gay men because of this particular sign. After carefully reading this case a countless number of times, I drew up my own questions about the case because there are pieces of information missing from the case that are critical when trying to charge somebody with a crime. First question: how are we to know that the attackers actually saw Estes’ sign or that the attackers did not just act out on their own deeply-held beliefs? Also, it does not say that the attack was…
Unequal Distribution of Blame A disastrous and chaotic time period of unconsolable mothers, wives, and children being left without the love of their family members and having to mourn on their deaths, was the result of something that could have been avoided, but was caused by confusion and pride. Europe was an envied nation due to their advance in technology, art, and music. Everything seemed to be going too well for the Europeans, but soon enough, everything changed. Europe had hope of creating a system which balanced the amount of power each nation had, in order to diminish the chances of one nation taking over the other, but many complications made it difficult for that plan to work out.…
From Slavery to a Newer Slavery Although the titles of Langston Hughes’ “Theme for English B” and Ralph Ellison’s “The Battle Royal” differ completely, they both intend to display African Americans as the subaltern and whites as the hegemony. The subaltern being a group or groups of people, who the hegemony imposes upon and the hegemony being the imposer of its own culture, environment and expectations upon the subaltern. In “Battle Royal” and “Theme for English B,” the hegemony imposes upon the subaltern by using different methods of grading based on the race of each student, rejection of their unifying human attributes and speaking in a less formal way to emphasize their position as the tyrannical hegemony. “Theme for English B” and “The…
For years, obscenity in the media has been a topic of debate and it’s coverage under the First Amendment. Roth v. United States (1957) and Miller v. California (1973) proved to have significant impact and influence on the creation of the legal definition of obscenity in the United States. In the case of Roth v. United States (1957), Samuel Roth was tried and convicted for the publication and mailing of obscene materials, which was a violation in the Southern District of New York, under the Comstock Act. In the courts decision, “First Amendment protections are defined as, all ideas having even the slightest redeeming social importance, unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas, even ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion.”…
The first ten amendments of the constitution, known as the Bill of Rights, can be applicable through the Fourteenth Amendments to ensure that state laws do not interfere with the rights of the citizens. This process is known as selective incorporation. The Bill of Rights allows allows citizens to freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, the right to an attorney, protection against cruel and unusual punishment, and other rights that protect citizens. At the time, certain powers were exclusive to the federal government, while others were exclusive to states. This was a problem because the Bill of Rights was protected under the federal government and not the states.…
Today, people are allowed to burn the American flag, cut out the state motto from their license plates, and advocate illegal activities without being convicted. The individuals who partook in those activities would be seen as convicted criminals, but the rights encrypted in the First Amendment protected them. However, numerous Americans believe that the First Amendment goes too far in the protections it promises. According to a survey by American Journalism Review, “49 percent said it gives us too much freedom, up from 39 percent last year and 22 percent in the year 2000”…
Nuisance can be separated into private, public and statutory nuisance. Private nuisance is “ the unreasonable use of man of his land to the detriment of his neighbour (Miller v. Jackson [1977] QB 966 (CA); 3 All ER 338) and can only be claimed by the individual affected that has an interest in the land . The potential defendants can be the creators of the nuisance, regardless of whether they are also the occupiers of the property .…
One of the most controversial, and perhaps,most important American legal principle, is the exclusionary clause which under Constitutional law, holds that evidence collected or analyzed in violation of defendants constitutional rights is not permitted for use in criminal persecutions. Sparked by the famous case Mapp v. Ohio, the exclusionary rule has a fair share of critics who argue that police blunders let criminals go free. In the 1961 Supreme Court case, Dollree Mapp was convicted when police searched her house ,under a false warrant, for a suspected bomb fugitive and found “lewd, lavicious, or obscene material”, otherwise known as pornography. Mapp claimed the police had no probable cause to search for the obscene materials found; the Court let her go because the material had been seized without a warrant. Despite the occasional occurrence of criminals going free, the exclusionary rule is vital to democracy because the principle ensures liberty and justice in America for all.…
An example of this is,” Anyone can paint on the council-owned wall any time they like. Mike Crilley, the graffiti wall project organizer, promotes the positive side of graffiti and runs workshops for local children.” (Graffiti: Art or Vandalism). There is a wall meant for people to walk by and embrace the art, or even make some of their own, without breaking a law and just to make the city prettier. They are even teaching kids about it, just like how kids take art classes in school to learn about historical art.…