Columbus' main plan during his voyage season was to reach Asia in search of spices. They were in search of an efficient route to travel to Asia. Their whole motivation for leaving Europe was to come across the mainland of Asia by sailing west of Europe. Knowing that the massive continent of Africa was in the was if your head east, they decided to head west. This seemed like a good plan until they ended up coming across the Indies in the Carribean. Columbus did not expect to reach these many beautiful islands and he thought he was in Asia at first. He is different as compared to other explorers such as William Bradford because he was exploring for global recognition. Bradford was not trying to search for hidden gems in another country, he instead
…show more content…
Females would be more devoted to read it and the males would not. Even though this is true she has a great approach to this problem. She confronts the issue in her poetry and states how the problem can be fixed. She does not harp on the issue too extensively because she does get into more emotional topics. The subjects that are involved such as the burning down of her house is not always relatable, and I'm pretty sure her critics would agree. You need to be able to step into her shoes when she discusses the struggles that occur while thinking about the materials inside her house. Or how after the fire, she remembers where the objects were in her house and how they looked before the fire occurred. She really made me picture how it would feel when her table was just remaining and what she used do at the table such as laugh or discuss stories. If someone such as myself has not experienced this, then they will not respect her poetry as much as someone who has been through a similar occurrence. When she views poetry the way she does, her ability can have a significant incline because her words are authentic, but her number of readers can decline. Her attitude that is reflected in parts of her poetry can be viewed as strong or intense because she is defending her gender and the gap that they have in poetry. When Bradstreet focusses on life experiences, comparisons to male poets, or speaks on female critics, it can help her and others success in the literary
Females would be more devoted to read it and the males would not. Even though this is true she has a great approach to this problem. She confronts the issue in her poetry and states how the problem can be fixed. She does not harp on the issue too extensively because she does get into more emotional topics. The subjects that are involved such as the burning down of her house is not always relatable, and I'm pretty sure her critics would agree. You need to be able to step into her shoes when she discusses the struggles that occur while thinking about the materials inside her house. Or how after the fire, she remembers where the objects were in her house and how they looked before the fire occurred. She really made me picture how it would feel when her table was just remaining and what she used do at the table such as laugh or discuss stories. If someone such as myself has not experienced this, then they will not respect her poetry as much as someone who has been through a similar occurrence. When she views poetry the way she does, her ability can have a significant incline because her words are authentic, but her number of readers can decline. Her attitude that is reflected in parts of her poetry can be viewed as strong or intense because she is defending her gender and the gap that they have in poetry. When Bradstreet focusses on life experiences, comparisons to male poets, or speaks on female critics, it can help her and others success in the literary