Here we go then, don’t take it to heart, it’s meant to help. My six of the best criticisms, over breakfast
1. You advertise your forum as ‘Christian Activism’ and so you’ve just lost a political audience. Yet when browsing the site and attracting Christians, it largely reverts back to politics and so you lose both audiences.
2. It meanders topically, the home page which is your introduction to the site, jumps from one topic to another and it’s difficult to know what the site is about. I think maybe you ought to pull out a short six of the best, the articles that sum up your site and front page them; this is what attracts your audience. Very few are going to read your bio first, which you could condense to two paragraphs. Badly written …show more content…
Never ever say, ‘I think’, or even give that impression.
Take BLM as an example
This will always start with the fact that blacks in the US are killed by the police in disproportion to whites. That’s true and so don’t try to argue against it. Build up an explanation of why, using facts.
The politics behind it
Who funds BLM (Soros), which radical politicians endorse it (Democrats) and the people who are paid to attend the protests (quotes from Facebook)
Conclusion: If it’s not political and about lives, why isn’t there the same outcry about black on black crime and deaths, which are also far more disproportionate to police killings and give statistics.
Dismissing racism as a cause and making it political
Give statistics of the amount of black middle-class Americans who aren’t being killed by their own race, or others. If the police are racist, why aren’t they killing the Chinese or Mexicans in proportion.
Conclusion: The large proportion of blacks killed are in Democrat run cities, which are also welfare disproportionate in numbers to other races and advocate alternative lifestyles.
Conclusion
It’s political; give Obama’s background, the people he associates with and his radical
1. You advertise your forum as ‘Christian Activism’ and so you’ve just lost a political audience. Yet when browsing the site and attracting Christians, it largely reverts back to politics and so you lose both audiences.
2. It meanders topically, the home page which is your introduction to the site, jumps from one topic to another and it’s difficult to know what the site is about. I think maybe you ought to pull out a short six of the best, the articles that sum up your site and front page them; this is what attracts your audience. Very few are going to read your bio first, which you could condense to two paragraphs. Badly written …show more content…
Never ever say, ‘I think’, or even give that impression.
Take BLM as an example
This will always start with the fact that blacks in the US are killed by the police in disproportion to whites. That’s true and so don’t try to argue against it. Build up an explanation of why, using facts.
The politics behind it
Who funds BLM (Soros), which radical politicians endorse it (Democrats) and the people who are paid to attend the protests (quotes from Facebook)
Conclusion: If it’s not political and about lives, why isn’t there the same outcry about black on black crime and deaths, which are also far more disproportionate to police killings and give statistics.
Dismissing racism as a cause and making it political
Give statistics of the amount of black middle-class Americans who aren’t being killed by their own race, or others. If the police are racist, why aren’t they killing the Chinese or Mexicans in proportion.
Conclusion: The large proportion of blacks killed are in Democrat run cities, which are also welfare disproportionate in numbers to other races and advocate alternative lifestyles.
Conclusion
It’s political; give Obama’s background, the people he associates with and his radical