John Roberts Supreme Court Justice

Superior Essays
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.
Just as it has been more interesting to take this class during an election year, perhaps now is also one of the most interesting times to study a Supreme Court justice. I chose John Roberts for two reasons, first, because he was a conservative and it is very likely that Donald Trump will choose a conservative justice this year. Secondly, because I thought it was interesting that he became a Supreme Court Justice at a relatively young age. I wondered, “Did he come from a well-known family?” “Were they wealthy?” or “Did he just put himself in all the right places at all the right times?” Interestingly enough, the first person that I mentioned I was going to do this report to said, “oh the flip-flopper... they thought he was going to be such a conservative and he 's not!” I thought, “Wow, I will have to learn a little more about this.”
John G. Roberts Jr. was born in Buffalo, New York On January 27, 1955 to father John Glover Roberts and mother Rosemary nee Podrasky (“John G. Roberts, Jr. | Oyez”). Four years later they moved to the very small town of Long Beach, Indiana where he grew up. He had three sisters: Kathy, Peggy, and Barbara (“John Roberts - Supreme Court Justice, Lawyer - Biography.com”). He attended Notre Dame Elementary School in Long Beach followed by La Lumiere boarding
…show more content…
There does however seem to be quite a controversy surrounding some of his other decisions and the New York Times has spent a great deal of time covering his cases as the occasional liberal vote has angered conservatives. The titles of some of their articles on nytimes.com are as follows: Court Leader or Leading Dissenter, Angering Conservatives and Liberals, Chief Justice John Roberts and Chief Justice John Roberts Amasses a Conservative Record, and Wrath From the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Thomas took a very stern stance on the executive branch having broad authority over the constitution and its federal statuses, this is easily expressed in the Case of Hamdi V. Rumsfeld where he was the only justice to agree that the federal government had the legal right to detain hi stating that since he was an illegal Enemy Combatant that he was not protected under the Geneva convention. Thomas avidly voted for decision that would grant state-governmental authority in cases that involved specifically federalism based limits on the congress authority. Interestingly enough as justice he was on average the most willing to exercise judicial review of federal statues in comparison with state statues he was the least likely to vote against them. Due to past that was filled was constant adversity his view on the bill of rights was very hard pressed on equal rights and the continuing social movent for them to be both recognized and protect this is shown through multiple examples within several of the amendments found in the bill of…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    William Wayne Justice, he was a formidable judge that sat on the federal bench in the state of Texas. He brought forth change throughout his years as a judge and some of those changes would be major reform decisions that will change the systems in Texas. He was a judge that made decisions that influenced changes and it was noticed not only in Texas, but throughout the United States. Judge Justice was involved in many controversial cases and reforms that gained attention all over. Not only the cases were controversial, but his decisions were ones that got people talking about him.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conquest By Law Analysis

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Lindsay G. Robertson's Conquest by Law: How the Discovery of America Dispossessed Indigenous Peoples of Their Lands centers on the landmark 1823 Supreme Court case Johnson vs. M'Intosh. Robertson's research provides previously undiscovered knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the case, placing the case in a new context. Robertson tells the story of a costly mistake, one made by the American judicial system but paid for by indigenous people who to this day suffer from the effects of American settlement. As reviewer Christopher Tomlin writes, "Robertson's narrative is far less concerned with parsing its legal doctrine, than with the historical circumstances of the case itself." Robertson begins his story in the middle of the 18th century,…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that these two justices’ jurisprudence, or philosophy of law, is shaped by their political ideologies. This is not to say, however, that I believe that the two justices’ political ideologies affect their ability to come to objective decisions since ultimately, their most important task is to remain impartial. The two SCOTUS justices are on the opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. In addition to their opposite ideologies, the pair has two completely different philosophies of law and therefore, vary in their methods of interpretation. Justice Breyer’s political alignment is more towards the liberal side of the court.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Marshall’s Biography Being the first of fifteen children, John Marshall was already a natural leader. He was a soldier in the Revolutionary War, a successful lawyer, and secretary and most importantly Chief Justice of the United States of America. He was a well-respected man that played important roles throughout his life. A major influence in his teenage years was his father’s good friend, George Washington. John Marshall’s young inspirations, military background, and powerful government leadership led him to be an important figure in U.S. history.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of Marshall’s tactics to unite the justices was to have all of the men live under the same roof. This way they would be forced to spend most of their time with each other and would get along better with one another. Marshall’s rulings in cases such as Talbot v. Seeman showed everyone Marshall’s potential power and ability to manipulate the system in order to reach the ruling he wants. Undoubtedly, John Marshall’s ruling in the famous Marbury v. Madison case was his greatest display of his power and knowledge of the system throughout his time as Chief Justice.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Judge Robert Bork was nominated to serve as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court on July 1, 1987 by President Ronald RJudge Robert Bork was nominated to serve as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court on July 1, 1987 by President Ronald Reagan. He was a Senior Judicial Advisor to Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign and solicitor general under President Richard M. Nixon. He fired Special Prosecutor, Archibald Cox, in what became known as the “Saturday Night Massacre”. He opposed the Supreme Court’s one man, one vote decision on legislative apportionment. He wrote an article opposing the 1964 Civil Rights law, requiring hotels, restaurants and other businesses to serve people of all races (Totenberg).…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Mock Supreme Court, I had the role of being a Justice, which made it my job to give the final judging in all cases involving laws of Congress, and the Constitution. I worked on the case Fisher v. University of Texas, rooting back to 1977 when Texas legislation made a law that required the University of Texas give admission to all high school seniors who positioned in the top ten percent of their class. When discovering the lack of diversity in the their college 's undergraduates and state populace, the University of Texas chose to change its previously unbiased racial acceptances . The new approach allowed all in-state students who graduated in the main ten percent of their high school classes admission. For the rest of the in-state…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In that position, he argued several cases before the Supreme Court, including Smith v. Allwright, Shelley v. Kraemer, and Brown v. Board of…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Louie Gohmert was born on August 18, 1953 in Pittsburgh, Texas. Louie is currently married to his wife Kathy, and they have a total of three children together. Before getting into politics Louie graduated from Texas A&M University then shortly after graduated from Baylor University’s Law School. During his time after college Louie also served as a captain in the U.S. Army. Before being elected to Congress in 2005, held many different positions in the state of Texas.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    13. I observed that even though women groups were concerned about Clarence Thomas ruling against legal abortion during the first few court hearings when Thomas was asked about abortion he didn't even have an opinion on it. 14.I observed that Anita Hill a professor a law professor from the University of Oklahoma accused Clarence Thomas of sexually harassing her when they worked together. 15. I observed after many hearings of the Clarence Thomas, and Anita Hill case in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee the Senate voted Clarence Thomas to be serve as an associate justice for the Supreme Court by a vote of 52-48.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lyndon's Assassination

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Lyndon was born in Texas on august 27, 1908 his family had settled prior to the Civil War. He was born in a nearby town called Johnson City. His father was a rancher and part time politician, but Lyndon did not inherit the family’s ranching talent. Which caused Lyndon to run into finical difficulty losing the family ranch at an early teenage year. Lyndon’s family was some of the earliest settlers in Texas before they all had been cattlemen, cotton farmers and soldiers for the confederacy.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Warren court was a time full of life changing events, whether they were good or bad they affected everyone. Changes were being made quite frequently to civil rights, judicial and federal powers. The Warren court was known for several different things such as: ending racial segregation, putting a stop to prayer in public schools, making the right to privacy very clear through the constitution, and much, much more. Without the Warren court, there is no say on how the United States would be right now. The background of the court is about as important as what happened during the years that it took place.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Supreme Court Judges

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When John Roberts was asked if he supported Roe v. Wade, he stated that “the case was now precedent in constitutional law and entitled to due respect.” He also insisted staying away from “issues that may come before the court again” (Dye and Gaddie 2014). While I agree that it is important to know the viewpoints of these judges on specific cases, it is also important to note that these judges, when appointed, may change their opinions with time, as we have seen with justices that deviate from the nominating president’s political philosophy. It is stated that due to this reason, “it is futile to choose nominees and confirm them on the basis of their political views” (Standler…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stomayor Speech Analysis

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sonia Sotomayor, a judge, in her speech Opening Statement to The Senate Judiciary Committee, describes her past and her accomplishments such as all of her experience being a judge and her nomination into the supreme court by president Obama. She writes about her experiences and shares her accomplishments so that her audience sees why she is a good candidate to be in the supreme court. Sotomayor’s purpose is to persuade and seek the support of the judges and America for her election into the supreme court. She supports her purpose with rhetorical appeals such as ethos and pathos. Sotomayor uses an optimistic tone and rhetorical appeals in order to convey her audience to vote for her to be in the Supreme court.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays