THESIS: Tongan and Iroquois political and social organization were different in several ways. Tongan political organization was by chiefdom, and social structure was through rank stratification divided by genealogical relationships of the primarily patrilineal line. The Iroquois’ political system was by tribe, and the societal organization was egalitarian with clans as matrilineal. Both are similar because of the heavy impact of European culture on both societies. European influence changed the gender roles, political structure, and the social hierarchy of each group.…
Joseph Brant was a Mohawk Indian during the revolutionary war, but what had made him special was his story. Of course he was a chief of the Mohawk tribe who served as a loyalist and assisted the British in many different ways during the war but he did much more than that. He was an enemy to the Americans, but he would have been a bigger threat to the world if he were to have lived a little bit longer because they didn't call him "Monster Brant" for nothing. During the war, Joseph was known and praised by the British as a hero, leader, and great commander.…
Indian Removal Act In 1828 Andrew Jackson had own presidency and had succeed by changing things with the government. One of many was him having a special relationship with the common people. He removed about 10 percent of workers and replaced with loyal friends and followers. In the 1800’s Native Americans had been living next to white neighbors, taking on their culture.…
American fellows! While we are enjoying the air of patriotic pride and the fortune to be one of the most intelligent and thoughtful citizens of the United States, we must stay alert to the critical problems that block our way to establish a divine and peaceful nation. However, the condition and ulterior destiny of the Indian tribes are trembling because of the absolute control of our president Andrew Jackson, regarding his brutal, arbitrary forces and various unjust acts towards Native Americans. His policies resulted in the usurpation of land, attempts to destroy tribal culture, and the forcible removal of Native Americans from homes in Southeastern of our nation to a designated territory west of the Mississippi River. Therefore, in order to save our Native American friends…
And it is supposed that the wandering savage has a stronger attachment to his land than the settled, civilized Christian?" (Jackson pg.2). The Indians' thoughts should have been recognized. The settlers had no right to up and move the Indians without their willing…
In John Smith’s informative writing, he narrates his experience in governing Jamestown involving the Native Americans inhabitants. Smith seemed to be fascinated by the way the Native Americans used their everyday resources to maintain a life. The land was not heavily populated, and the people differed in value, especially in language. Smith characterized the Natives as “crafty, timorous quick of apprehension, and very ingenious (America Firsthand, 20) Everything they did was extraordinary to Smith, from the apparel and being covered in the skin of a wild animal, to the homes that are similar to their arbors of small young springs bowed and tied.…
There was much discrimination against Chief Joseph and his people. One example of this was that they were forced to move 1400 miles to Canada because white prospectors started invading their land. “By the mid-1800’s the indians were hopelessly outnumbered by the whites.” While native americans numbers were decreasing, the whites population was rapidly increasing.…
The American reformers set up training programs for the Indians so they could have the opportunity to own and operate their own farms. Later, the American government decided to divide the tribal land and distribute those lands to certain families. The tribal families had the full liberty to either hold their land or sell it (Brinkley, 398). The Indians, like the Nez Percé tribe fought with the government over many things, the main thing the Indians continued to struggle with was the constant greedy men who only wanted the gold and riches for…
Reformers saw these provisions as the way to radically change federal Indian policy and initiate a new era for American Indians. Like the Indian removal policy of the 1830s, allotment was a program on which both pro-and anti-Indian groups could agree on as a ‘solution’ to the ‘Indian problem.’ The new policy would terminate communal ownership, push Indians into mainstream society, and offer for sale ‘surplus’ land not used by Indians. The law was an attempt to impose a revolution on Indian societies. Allotment, its advocates believed, would liberate Indians from the stifling hold of community and instill individual ambition, American ideas of property rights, habits of thrift, and industry.…
After reading this excerpt from the book Crazy Horse: The Strange Man of the Oglalas by Mari Sandoz this passage gave Crazy Horse’s thoughts about the encroachment of the white man into Indian territory. The influential leader of the Oglala Sioux Tribe, Crazy Horse, held out against the government's efforts to imprison the Sioux on reservations. Almost all the Native Americans were sent to reservations by the late nineteenth century (Pollard, pg. 571). Crazy Horse was involved in many battles, including the Battle of Little Bighorn. Reading this excerpt reminded me of many other unimaginable stories of Indian relocation such as the Trail of Tears, conflicts between Native Americans and the European settlers, and the United States government’s…
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was one of America's greatest rhetorical manipulations; as well as, a tragic fate for thousands of Native Americans. President Jackson addresses Congress stating, "It gives me pleasure to announce to Congress that the benevolent policy of the Government...in relation to the removal of the Indians beyond the white settlements is approaching to a happy consummation” (President Jackson's address to Congress). The language used not only misrepresents what actually occurred during relocation, but also twists the historical legacy of the Indian Removal Act. President Jackson uses “happy” and “great pleasure” giving the impression the natives and the executive and legislative branches are joyous of the impending doom for the tribes.…
Native Americans were the first to settle in America and were defined by the English as indigenous people. The English labeled the indigenous people as “savages” and viewed them as an uncivilized culture, while they viewed themselves as a civilized culture. In Robert Warrior’s “Indian,” he argues the idea of the present absence of indigenous culture meaning their culture is what made up American culture and no one realizes it. In the “Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson,” Mary Rowlandson explains her feelings and experience while Native Americans held her captive. In the beginning, her perception of the world was defined as either savage or civilized.…
The goals of settler colonialism led to the mistreatment of Native Americans, Mexicans, Africans, and African Americans, and because of the history of the country as well as the nature of U.S. government, these groups of people are still discriminated against today. The persistence of such a structure, in regards to Native Americans, is due to the fact that indigenous people who originally resided on the land that white Americans claim as their own have not left, the white colonizers are still present, and the two groups still do not necessarily see eye to eye. The fact that the effects of settler colonialism, along with settler colonialism itself, have persevered over time have led to distorted concepts of what it means to belong in U.S. society. One effect of settler colonialism is the existence of Indian Reservations.…
In the beginning of the book, Junior describes his life on the Spokane reservation. He tells the readers that, due to poverty, many of the Native Americans have poor land, health care, and education. Also, they’ve lived in these conditions all of their entire…
Which changed the view of native nations from co-equals to a group they could dominate over, ultimately “population/resources overturn juridical notion of Indians…