Cherokee Vs Georgia Case Study

Improved Essays
Cherokee Nation v Georgia was a United States Supreme Court case in the 1831. It was “one of the ten worst cases” (pg.87). “The Cherokee Nation was the first Indian tribe that went to the federal court in a major lawsuit to protect the political, human, and property rights of an American Indian tribe and its member from destruction by a state” (Pg.87). The case of the Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was filed by the Cherokee Nation one of America’s most well-known Native American tribes.
Using this argument in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, Attorney General Wirt asked the Supreme Court to rule Georgia law null and void because the state violated the United States’ Constitution. The United States Supreme Court refused to hear the suit. The court said

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Martin appealed to the Supreme Court who decided for Martin pursuant to the treaty. The issue that went before the court was if the Supreme Court had jurisdiction to hear cases on appeal from state…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the heart of the trial, concerns over tribal cultures’ sovereignty and the role the United States government could play in Native American societies are found. The legal arguments of the jury, prosecution, and judge all blend together to create an ambiguous special verdict that specifies the legitimacy of tribal traditions while reinforcing the circuit court’s ultimate power over assigning and specifying the terms of these traditions. Due to this multi-faceted ruling, Menominee concerns were assuaged by the temporary confirmation of their autonomy and United States judicial rights to interfere in the affairs of Native Americans were also reinforced. What in contemporary times is considered a fascinating anecdote in the history of the formation of the Wisconsin government had much darker undertones during the time period. Ultimately, the conviction of Chief Oshkosh for murder represented an assertion of federal power over Native American affairs without the genuine interest or dedication to policing those…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    government wanted to see. The documents, when reasoning whether or not Indian Nations were independent of the United States, are often unclear and contradictory. In the Cherokee Nation vs. Georgia, Native Nations are said to “look to [the U.S. government] for protection; rely upon its kindness and its power; appeal to it for relief and to their wants, whereas in Worchester v. Georgia it is instead emphasized that “the Indian nations had always been considered as distinct, independent political communities, retaining their original natural rights, as the undisputed possessors of the soil.” Although both these statements may be valid in their contexts, it is interesting to take into account that Cherokee Nation vs. Georgia is making a case against the Cherokee directly, while in Worchester v. Georgia the Cherokee are involved as an indirect party. The variance in language toward Indian Nations furthers the idea that attitudes toward Indigenous people were easily altered depending on the…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The struggle between the Native Americans and the Americans was extremely relevant and volatile during the 1800’s. The struggle escalated in 1830 when Andrew Jackson passed the Indian Removal Act (“Worcester”). As a result, new issues arose on a fight that had been around for centuries between the Native Americans and the Americans. One major collateral outcome of this act is the Supreme Court case, Worcester vs. Georgia. This case and the results of it turned out to be a major step forward for the Native Americans fighting for their rights and freedom during this time.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whereas, the outcome was unsatisfactory. The court has denied the request despite Houston’s…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Federal Government questions members of the 55,000 plus Lumbee Tribe as to their true “Indianness.” Though recognized as a Native American Tribe by the State of North Carolina since 1885, the Tribe is fighting and has been fighting for over 125 years to be federally recognized. The Act that allowed them to be partially recognized was the Lumbee Act in 1956, which allows certain rights and effects on the Tribe federally. However, the Act denies many federally recognized services due to…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Gregg v. Georgia starts with a man named Troy Gregg. Troy was imprisoned by the state of Georgia after he was found guilty of armed robbery and murdering two people in 1973. Following Gregg’s trial, the jury found Tory Gregg guilty and sentenced him to death. Troy challenged his remaining death sentence for murder, asked for an appeal, and claimed that his capital sentence was cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the 8th amendment. The Georgia state court ruled that the death penalty was for murder.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This law was to remove Native Americans from the east of the Mississippi river. The Native Americans were forced to follow US law and leave there homelands. Most Native Americans moved west with their tribes. The Cherokee tribe stayed in Georgia and fought this law. They brought their case to Supreme Court, but there attempts failed.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Failure of the federal law to grant “fair treatment” to the tribal governments through “meaningful involvement” impedes effectiveness of tribal institutions that are unable to “exercise sovereignty effectively”. Forced assimilation as a colonial legacy has…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cherokee people lived all over the land before the United States even existed. “The Cherokees lived on land extending from North Carolina to South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, and Alabama for hundreds of years” (Green & Perdue, 1). They were constantly moving around involuntarily. The Cherokee tribes were often forced to leave their land when Americans found use of the land that the Cherokees were living on. White Americans were wanting their land because they found gold, wanted their livestock and they were able to evict the Cherokees out of their homes” (Green & Perdue, 92)…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did you know that the indians had massacred men, women, and children during 1812? The cherokee Indians were given the option to move to the indian territory in Louisiana. So the americans can have the georgia state and that they didn’t like the fact that the indians had killed people. So the americans wanted them to move to an indian territory so they wouldn’t have to kill the americans. They were also given money and a large land but if they didn’t move then they would have to follow the laws of Georgia.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Marshall Speech Hello, I am John Marshall, first chief justice of the supreme court and I am here, in the supreme court, to give you my verdict of the case of Worcester v. Georgia. Sour relations between Americans and Native Americans dates all the way back to 1600, when white settlers either forced Native Americans out or sought to convert them and make them assimilate. Georgia, 1827, Americans keep extending their jurisdiction over the Cherokee territory and continuously passing laws that would abolish Cherokee infrastructure.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chief John Ross had a valid and undeniably strong argument against the 1835 Treaty of New Echota. He argues that treaty “is a fraud upon the government of the United States and an act of oppression on the Cherokee people” (John Ross’s Letter). He states that the Cherokee people, which was over 15,000 people, would never had agreed to the treaty and the treaty was made wrongfully. He argues that there should be another meeting and the Cherokee people should be equally consulted. John Ross uses a valid piece of evidence to support his argument.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his presidency, Andrew Jackson no doubt planned the removal of Indians for the benefit of the US. However, when he misled the Indians into thinking he did it for their sakes, he went against his own promises of peaceful relations and respect for the Native Americans. Jackson refused to enforce the Supreme Court’s decision in the Worcester vs Georgia case where the Cherokees’ sovereignty was established, and continued to badger them into moving without acknowledging their rights. In dealing with the Indians, Jackson neglected the Treaty of Tellico, a treaty established in 1805 that set clear boundaries between the US and Cherokees, and pushed them out of their own lands. Therefore, because of his unlawful actions in dealing with the Native…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethnography Report – Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma The tribe I’ll be discussing throughout my ethnography report are the Cherokee Indians. There are three sub-tribes to the Cherokee’s which are the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians and United Keetoowah Band of Cherokees. Although they all originate from the same tribe/settlement, I’m going to be discussing the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma. Today, this tribe of Cherokee’s live within 14 counties of Northeastern Oklahoma.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays