Charlie Gard Case Study

Great Essays
Introduction
Part 1 of my essay is split into 3 separate parts, the first being a summary and the interpretive issues of the case in question, the second being how has the judge interpreted these issues, and finally the third being how should the judge have interpreted these issues.
Summary of the case, and interpretive issues.
The case of Great Ormond Street Hospital v Constance Yates, Chris Gard, Charles Gard (A Child, by his Guardian Ad Litem), 11 April 2017 [2017] EWHC 972 (Fam) is about a young child, who at the time of the high court decision was 8 months old, named Charlie Gard. Charlie suffered from an exceptionally rare genetic mutation, known as severe encephalomyopathic mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome (MDDS). He required life
…show more content…
As stated by Dominic Wilkinson, “Parents will not always make the best choices, but for the most part the state will not interfere or intervene. However, where parents’ decisions run a substantial risk of causing serious harm to their child, their decisions must be challenged, if necessary in a court”. In the Charlie Gard case there was conflict regarding what was in Charlie’s best interests between his parents and the hospital in which he was being treated. This is what led to the courts getting involved. A question commonly raised by people is why should the parents not be the ones to decide in the first place and why the courts should even intervene at all. This was however addressed by Mr Justice Francis, “A child’s parents having parental responsibility have the power to give consent for their child to undergo treatment, but overriding control is vested in the court exercising its independent and objective judgment in the child’s best …show more content…
It is important that I stress that I am not applying a subjective test. I am not saying what I would do in a given situation, but I am applying the law” and therefore we can say that Francis J is in the position of a happy interpreter. Using Adam’s and Brownsword’s definition of ‘a typology of judicial approaches’ the judicial approach carried out by Francis J is “purposive formalist”. This conclusion can be reach as “statues are to be interpreted with a view to implement the purposive scheme and decisions made by the legislature”. In the Charlie Gard case the purposive scheme and decisions of the statues referred to, helped the courts conclude that what needed to be looked at was what was in Charlie’s best interest. This judicial approach “signifies that the fidelity to legislative enactment overrides all other underlying values”. Francis J made this interpretation by receiving advice from medical experts who all said that the treatment would be futile, and stuck to the principle in mind which was the best interests of Charlie. He put Charlie’s best interests above all underlying values such as the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A person’s autonomy is a privilege that is earned through the knowledge gained through life experiences. For children, the right to decide is withdrawn because the parent’s are thought to know what is best in the circumstances concerning their children. The ability to understand and comprehend the severity of illness or the consequences of decisions is lacking in adolescents. They are deemed incapable of making informed decisions thus incompetent; therefore, the parents are given the authority to provide or deny consent on behalf of their children. Similarly, elderly who are experiencing deteriorating illnesses may have an altered competence due to being in denial or having fear of the outcome.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After five years and with virtually no chance for recovery, her parents asked hospital employees to terminate their daughter’s life support and remove the tubes (“Case Briefs”, par 3). By this time, most of the annual costs of hospitalization was being paid by the state of Missouri. The care costs had exhausted the Cruzan’s resources (“Cruzan v Director”, par 3). The state hospital officials had refused to terminate life support without court approval.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Healthcare professionals are required to take an oath that states “do no harm.” This oath is the epitome of the principle of nonmaleficince. Healthcare professionals did not want to cause avoidable damage to Cowart; therefore, they used this principle to support their reasoning. In this particular incident, this oath was manipulated also into supporting the principle of paternalism, which justified the constant unwanted treatments given to Cowart. According to Gerald Dworkin’s piece, “… In ‘pure’ paternalism, the class of persons whose freedom is restricted is identical with the class of persons whose benefit is intended to be promoted by such restrictions” (citation).…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this reflection paper, I will be discussing the R v Jobidon case. In this case, the specific issue from the judgement I would like to address is the issue whether consent can be read out of the offence of criminal assault. According to section 265 (1)(a) of the Criminal Code, assault is defined as the intentional application of force to another person “without the consent of [the other] person.” This reflection paper will first acknowledge implications of statutory interpretation of common law, instead of the Criminal Code.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    [We] have aptly summarized this quest, based on [the Court of Appeals’] past decisions, as one that requires an examination of the statutory text in context, a review of legislative history to confirm conclusions or resolve questions from that examination, and a consideration of the consequences of alternative readings. “Text is the plain language of the relevant provision, typically given its ordinary meaning, viewed in context, considered in light of the whole statute, and generally evaluated for ambiguity. Legislative purpose, either apparent from the text or gathered from external sources, often informs, if not controls, our reading of the statute. An examination of interpretive consequences, either as a comparison of the results of each proffered construction, or as a principle of avoidance of an absurd or unreasonable reading, grounds the court’s interpretation in reality.” Town of Oxford v. Koste, 204 Md. App. 578, 585–86, 42 A.3d 637 (2012), aff'd, 431 Md. 14, 63 A.3d 582 (2013) (citations…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Dred Scott Case

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An Issue of Rights Has there ever been a time in your life where people have questioned the choices you made? Or ever told you that you had no right or freedom to say or do something? Well the issues of rights and freedom were the central points surrounding the Dred Scott case. There was a controversy about the rights that slaves had; and Dred Scott challenged his owner in the court system to take an in depth look at the freedoms that slaves should have. During the late 1800’s, this case played an enormous role in the politics.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    5.07 Case 18

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have you ever met a person who didn’t have any parents or guardians ? Did you ever think about what might happen if something bad were to happen to them and they needed medical treatment?. You probably didn’t but that’s fine it’s not your job to worry about but this is a situation that could possibly happen so if it did what would they do?…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bush Vs Schiavo Case Study

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages

    That choice is last and the Legislature's endeavor to modify that last arbitration is un-protected as connected to Theresa Schiavo. Further, regardless of the possibility that there had been no last judgment for this situation, the Legislature gave the Governor naturally insufficient benchmarks for the use of the authoritative power assigned in part 2003-418. Since part 2003-418 crosses paths with [the state constitution] in both regards, the Supreme Court avowed the circuit court's last outline judgment. How are the facts in this case different from Chiles v. Children (FL 1991)? The facts in this case are different from Chiles because Chiles was in the year 1991 and Schiavo was in 2004.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Title: Brady v. Maryland Facts: In this case petitioner Brady was convicted by a Maryland court for murder in the first degree. During his trial, he admitted his complicity in the actual planning as well as the commission of the crime. Unfortunately, he denied having any personally committed the killing but was in fact perpetrated by his companion. His defense counsel admitted that his client was guilty at the trial, but explained to the jury that they should find him guilty but they should not impose the death penalty because of his lesser culpability. Prior to the trial, Brady’s attorney ask for access to all of the accomplice’s statements to the police which, most of them were provided to him with the exception of one.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R V Labaye Case Study

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This essay will discuss the case of R v. Labaye. A summary of the nature of the proceeding and the judges writing decision, facts, legal issues, the decision, judicial reasoning and a thorough analysis will be addressed in this essay. I prefer the reasoning of the majority decision as it is reasonable and ethical. The nature of the proceeding is an appeal heard from the Supreme Court of Canada.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marshalls rulings in the past case of Bowman and Swartwout complicate the case by, the memebers of the court had a discussion on wheater or not to revise the case and the prejudice that could be affecting Burr’s case. Marshall had uncertanity about the Bowman and Swartwout case, the theory of wheater the ruling on the past Bowman case applied to the Burr case was confirmed. Marshall, declared, his reasoning for examinging this previous case was in the view of, nobody was unbias in this case; he held the president and the press responsible. The subtle point of the case, included it was a necessitate to have two witnesses to convict Burr of treason, Burr’s autorney voiced the witnesses, Hay, provided were “irrelevent” and inabmissable in court.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The measure of standards is governed by an element of people’s point of view. (Lippincott et al, 2013) A nurse may consider a certain kind of service delivery as a perfect delivery. In contrast the patient may find the delivery rather below par and unacceptable In medical practice, a team of nurses associated with patient attendance should work together in setting standards of service delivery. One mode of eliminating individualistic standards among nurses is by creating a conceptual framework which governs the standards of service delivery. Quality service delivery statements and protocols can assist in alignment of standards.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1.3.1 Case Laws: 1.3.2 The Gillick competence Both at common law and statutory provisions, children have the capacity to perform certain acts and take certain decisions even without the consent of their parents or guardians. The critical question is whether the child has reached the age of maturity and has the capacity to make those decision or actions. Ms Gillick brought a court case against both the Council and the Health Authority about contraception, which she argues was unlawful, on the grounds that it is causing or empowering unlawful sex with children under 16 years, and contravenes s 28(1) of the Sexual Offenses Act 1956, or the offense of being an accomplice to unlawful sex with children under 16, as opposed to s 6(1) of that Act.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Standard Operating Procedure; Consent and Treatment (2012), for example, if the patient is unable to give consent due to incapacities to make a sound decision (unconscious and/or mentally unstable, etc) and require emergency medical treatment to avoid serious harm, the health professionals can provide treatment by demonstrating professionalism to act in patient’s best interest and legislation would protect for the minors under 18 years old (Guardianship Act 1987 for New South Wales)and it will be different to other states)and mentally disable patient by appointing them a guardian to advocate their rights and make an appropriate medical decision for them (Daly, Speedy, & Jackson, 2010). However, with an exception of medically urgent situation, if patients who arrived in the operating theatre without valid consent the health professionals should not move the patient to the treatment bay and relevant supervisors, such as Clinical Nurse Manger, Medical Director and other health service administrators, should be notified. Treatment should also be cancelled or withheld until the valid consent is available.…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then continuing treatment is conditional on an individual basis. Actions should always be taken in the child’s best interest. In Charlie’s case, the care team believed that withdrawing life support and providing palliative care was in his best interest. The parents merely petitioned for a little more time with their new…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays