Natural Selection Charles Darwin Charles Darwin Natural Selection article is knowledgeable that makes it usable and reliable. Natural Selection article comes with many good qualities. The statement Darwin being influenced by other scientist made this article better. A good example of this is when Darwin says, "Benefitted from Sir Charles Lyell who demonstrated the earth was millions of times older then had previously been imagined." pg 314. By him using scientist names and explaining their theories it brings creditability to Darwin 's work. By him asking a question he makes the reader have to think and that is important because it engages the reader. Example is when he is saying " Variations neither useful nor injurious would not be affected
…show more content…
He knew by writing this though he would face the same as Sir Charles Lyell had on people having some push back to the ideas of something else then that God made and did everything. Darwin states, "exemplified in the above imaginary instances, is open to the same objections which were first urged against Sir Charles Lyell..." pg 325. He delivered is article by making it know things would not match up with the original thought that refers to what God did. That is okay though that it went against the original idea everyone had. It was okay because he was growing and expanding the way how people were thinking. He challenged the norm to learn more, than to just listen to everyone else thought. Darwin used information and supplied making it effective. How he viewed things can be seen in the example when he says, " Variations neither useful nor injurious would not be affected by natural selection, and would be left either a fluctuating element, as perhaps we seeing certain polymorphic species..." pg.315 The knowledge he used to make his theory made it where people could put their views to the side and give his theory a chance. Which what he was saying compared to the other scientist made since and even took all the other theories a step
He knew by writing this though he would face the same as Sir Charles Lyell had on people having some push back to the ideas of something else then that God made and did everything. Darwin states, "exemplified in the above imaginary instances, is open to the same objections which were first urged against Sir Charles Lyell..." pg 325. He delivered is article by making it know things would not match up with the original thought that refers to what God did. That is okay though that it went against the original idea everyone had. It was okay because he was growing and expanding the way how people were thinking. He challenged the norm to learn more, than to just listen to everyone else thought. Darwin used information and supplied making it effective. How he viewed things can be seen in the example when he says, " Variations neither useful nor injurious would not be affected by natural selection, and would be left either a fluctuating element, as perhaps we seeing certain polymorphic species..." pg.315 The knowledge he used to make his theory made it where people could put their views to the side and give his theory a chance. Which what he was saying compared to the other scientist made since and even took all the other theories a step