Charlemagne In Life Of Charlemagne By Einhard

Improved Essays
The audience of Life of Charlemagne is the constituents of the kingdom he once ruled. Einhard could not just say that Charlemagne is the “most splendid and greatest of all men,” he needed to prove it (136). Einhard strategically uses unflattering honesty to build his credibility in order to prove that Charlemagne was a great leader.
Einhard understands that it will be harder to make the audience believe that Charlemagne was as wonderful as he claims because Charlemagne’s father deposed the former king who was a part of the long reigning Merovingian Dynasty (136-7). Throughout all of sections one, two, and three, Einhard continuously reiterates this to show that he is still very aware of what happened, but that does not mean Charlemagne was

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Essay Question #2 Melanie A Morway October 6, 2016 The way that our text book describes Charlemagne and the way that the selection from Einhard describes Charlemagne are different in several ways, yet there are some similarities. Our text book describes him as a man that was instrumental in implementing the practices of a Feudal society in Europe. “Perhaps the most important ruler to codify and adopt these practice was Charlemagne, who dreamed not only of unifying Europe under his rule, but also unifying Church and state in a single administrative and political bureaucracy”(Sayre, pg 82). Our text book goes on the discuss Charlemagne’s accomplishments. Einhard’s writing takes a more personal turn, and describes not only his personal and private life, but also describes his looks.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was interesting to see that how Charlemagne has many different personalities as a leader. I found one short story that was very interesting about Charlemagne. In the story it said that “sons of two nobles, whose duty it was to keep watch at the door of the king’s tent” (88,Stammerer). The nobles did not do a very job with the task that they were given with. The nobles drank so much that they were passed out and left Charlemagne tent unguarded.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles The Great Dbq

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Charlemagne or Charles the Great is most famous ruler of the Middle Ages. He lived ca 742-814 and ruled over the Frankish kingdom which covered Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and a part of western Germany. He went on to conquer much of western Europe, all under a policy of friendship and cooperation with the Christian Church. He therefore greatly contributed to the expansion of the Christian Church’s power. He also introduced the basis of Feudalism and revived the political and cultural life of Europe after the fall of Western Rome.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Charlemagne, also known as Charles the Great, greatly impacted Ancient Rome through his role as Emperor of Western Europe. Through art and culture Charlemagne’s traditions still exist today. In order to understand his impact it is crucial to learn his background, time as a ruler, effect on Ancient Rome, the Carolingian renaissance, and traditions that exist today. Just like any other ruler, Charlemagne had to start somewhere.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Little is known about Charlemagne's childhood; in 754, however, he participated in the anointment of Pepin as king by Pope Stephen II. He was educated at the palace school primarily by Fulrad, the abbot of St. Denis (Facts). Charlemagne and his brother, Carloman, were both proclaimed king and were to rule the kingdom jointly but Carloman died unexpectedly in 771 and left Charlemagne the ruler of the entire kingdom (Facts). Though he had to rule alone, he excelled at that role and became a great leader. Charlemagne is a famous Historical figure because of his devotion to the Christian religion, as well as for his role as a community leader, and his success as an Emperor.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Notker and Einhard both wrote accounts about Charlemagne, titled "The Life of Charlemagne. " They both respected him as a Christian and leader of the Franks, however they take an alternate point of view on him. Einhard actually knew Charlemagne, and displays him as a three-dimensional, reasonable individual, with numerous achievements a few failings. Notker considers him to be a legend that he took in of from his older folks, overwhelming and larger than life. Einhard laid out his life story logically,as a kind of historical record of Charles’ life, while Notker put together more of a collection of anecdotes.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Looking at the reigns of the ancient rulers, one sees evidence of how these attributes make a good ruler, affected their reign, and, in turn, the lives of their subjects. Comparing two rulers, Alexander of Mesopotamian and Clovis, King of the Franks, the similarities are unmistakable. Each one demonstrated vast military knowledge and courage. During military offensives, Clovis pillaged neighboring villages in pursuit of treasure. Alexander was a military genius and trained…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Chrlemagne Vs Charlemagne

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Charlemagne’s main concern was education and religion, so he attended one of his many schools as a student, and sent Monks to preserve and spread Christianity to new lands. After Charlemagne’s death, internal and outside…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This shows the way in which Charlemagne approached the running of his empire with dignity and honor and the belief in doing what was right. There is also a similar theme present in Beowulf. After Beowulf returned from the land of the Danes, the King of the Geats was killed. As was custom, the throne proceeded to his son. However, the Queen held “no belief in her son’s ability to defend their homeland against foreign invaders” (Beowulf 2371-2372).…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Einhard composes Life of Charlemagne in 825 AD with the intention of commemorating King Charles’s well rounded devotion to his kingdom and his family, as he went beyond the expected duties of a King. Throughout the course of his life, Einhard had became very fond of the King and felt it his responsibility to preserve his knowledge of the King’s great deeds subsequent to the King’s death. Einhard provides a detailed piece of writing in which he eternalizes the deeds enacted by the King through which the King’s devotion, to both his kingdom and his family, is reflected. First, Einhard provides some detail about rulers who came before King Charles. In doing so, he provides the reader the opportunity to create a comparison in which King Charles…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The differences between King Latium and King Evander are evident in the origin of their nations and peoples, the physical description and status of their lands, and the treatment…

    • 1977 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Agrippina’s unwavering ambition was rooted in her imperial upbringing and family background. She benefited from valuable insight into the maintenance of power and her illustrious birth provided the framework for her power and influence. As her father, Germanicus’ immense popularity with the Army and the Roman people, made him a paramount connection for Agrippina and she derived, from him, a great deal of prominence. Barrett (2005) posits that his victory in Germany was “a memory that his daughter would exploit to the full”. This idea is reinforced by Tacitus (Annals) who asserts that “the effect” of this victory “was heightened...by the five children”.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two lives of Charlemagne is a book that has the writings of two people that wrote about the life of Charlemagne. The first person was a man named Einhard who wrote a biography of Charlemagne’s life. The second was Notker the Stammerer who wrote about the deeds of Charlemagne. The writings from Einhard and Notker combine to make the book Two lives of Charlemagne. The text will focus on six ideals from the text.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. In the opening paragraph, King has a very sarcastic tone but with some respect tied to it. He incorporates sarcasm because the audience knows that he does not have secretaries helping him and the only thing he can do is answer. He includes respect in this very sarcastic paragraph by saying that he does not answer many of his letters but they are “men of genuine good” so King feels it is necessary to respond.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The role of Louis IX in Chronicles of the Crusades is very different from the portrayal of Charlemagne in The Song of Roland. Louis is a lot closer to the absolute monarch than Charlemagne was. Charlemagne was powerful, but only as powerful as the people who swore allegiance to him. Louis has his own power base. He has his lands which are controlled and loyal only to him.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays