The Validity Of The Act Of Parliament In The UK

Great Essays
Chapter 4: Legislation
Answer Structure
1. Intro
-Act of Parliament is also known as domestic legislation is the law made by Parliament.
-Parliament consists of the House of Commons and House of Lords, and every bill has to pass to the Queen for consent.
-Members of Parliament sit in the House of Commons are elected by the general public in five years, whereas members of the House of Lords are appointed by Queen.
-Parliament is sovereign in the United Kingdom as it can make or unmake any law and no one can question its validity, which held in Pickin v Britain Railway Board (1974).
-Before a bill can become a legislation, it must be drafted on a green paper to collect comments from interested parties and later on a white paper with details of
…show more content…
This bill are sent to the public bills office and examined by two examiners.
-Crossrail Bill – an east-west rail link across Central London.
Then subject to the Parliamentary Procedure such as standing committee, 2nd Reading, Select Committee, Committee Stage, Report Stage, 3rd Reading, House of Lords and Royal Assent.

3. Advantages
-It is a complete procedure which allows the bill to be debated, scrutinised and amended. -It is democratic as the members in House of Commons are elected by general public and they involve in major part of the law making process.
-The Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 limited the power of House of Lords as it means the elected government can pass the bill to Queen without the consent of House of Lords.
-The House of Lords is good, treated it as a checking system to refine laws that are being debated and passed through the House of Commons.
-Flexibility of the law making system as due the different types of bills, it is not just the Government that can proposed the bill.

4. Disadvantages
-Undemocratic as the House of Lords are not elected by public and they can change what they don’t like within reason.
-The Law making process is lengthy as it takes few months to pass a
…show more content…
-A lot of the language, statues and evidence for the Parliaments to make on their laws, which is complexity and nobody can actually

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The United Kingdom is referred to having an unwritten constitution, but that is not strictly true. This may not refer in one single text, such as Germany or USA, but large parts are written down with much of it in the laws passed in parliament, these are called constitutional statue. According to Lord Justice Laws in the case Thoburn v Sunderland City Council this is an act witch either the conditions the legal relationship between the individual and the state in some way or enlarges or diminishes the scope of fundamental constitutional rights. Examples of constitutional statue are; Magna Carta 1297 , The Bill Of Rights 1689 and The Human Rights Act 1998 . Parliament sovereignty is one the core principles in the United Kingdom constitution.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rather than simply deciding which level of government ought to have jurisdiction over a particular public policy, the judiciary has now been invited to hold legislative decisions up to scrutiny against a higher constitutional standard, and perhaps decide that no level of government can legislate in a given area. Section 525 of the Charter gives the courts of Canada their authority to declare legislation inoperative, but it is section 16 that prescribes their mandate, guaranteeing as it does the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Charter "subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society." Thus the rights set out are not absolute rights, but require that the judiciary…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At first the house of commons does a first reading in which the printed copies are available. This is where the purpose of the bill is explained. It provides them with the process of learning in depth about the bill. If they have any new suggestion to include inside the bill they have the right to do so. This determines whether the bill is ready for the next stage.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Parliamentary supremacy, is peremptory rule of constitutional law that Parliament has the power to make or remove any law whatever. It gives power to Legislature to set the law, instead of the judiciary. It means legislative branch is supreme to all other government institutions, including any executive or judicial…

    • 50 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Another form of checks and balances has been the implementation of constrained parliamentarism. Another form of checks and balances has been established with Parliament seeing the need for different institutions such as the Auditor General’s office, Freedom of Information, Integrity commissions and the Ombudsman to reformed upper houses (Fenna,…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bill is a vital part as it entails the policies of the law that is being created. The bill has to go through a process…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A lack of a centralized government can severely change a kingdoms’s stability and its ability to protect itself. This was evident in the medieval kingdoms in Europe. The changes in the political system, the economic changes, the social changes, and the changes in the stability of the kingdoms all played a part in the medieval kingdoms because of the lack of a necessary centralized government. Once the Carolingian Empire was divided after Charlemagne's death, there was much internal instability. The Carolingian rulers fought over which land was theirs, which allowed the local nobles to gain more power.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The House of Commons • Members of the House are elected by the citizens during a federal election held every 4 years. • The house of Commons seats 308 members. • A member of Parliament can serve for 4 years until the next election. • Each session of parliament begins with the speech from the Throne. • Parliament has recesses so the MPs can work in their regions.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As we know parliamentary sovereignty is very important within the UK law. To express the importance, parliamentary supremacy means that parliament has unlimited legal power to act within any law without external restraint. In R V A-G 2006, Lord Bingham described this as the bedrock to the british constitution. Parliamentary supremacy came into the UK in 1689. This was after King James II had tried to use Royal prerogatives to favour the catholics.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The House of Lords review any proposed by The House of Commons, and if amendments are suggested, as a result the House of Commons will then consider the changes, meaning the House of Lords and more superior in the English Courts System. Consequently this means for a Law to be passed without a form of Delegated Legislation, The House of Commons would have to dissect every proposed Law before it reaches The House of Lords, suggesting that Delegated legislation poses more benefits for The House of Commons than it does for the House of Lords. Three Statutory Mechanisms are used to make delegated legislation; By-laws (sometimes known as byelaws), Order in Council and Statutory Instruments. Each of these methods differ considerably, and each benefits the English law making system. These statutory mechanisms allow Parliament to make a new or altered Law without passing a new Act to do so, meaning the process saves time and…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, in 1997 the general election has a 71.4% voter turnout compared to a low 59.4% in 2001 (Electoral Commission, 2016) this will show that the House of Lords still has no legitimacy if an electoral system was introduced. With this in mind, we can also question what electoral system would be introduced? If we use the system to elect MPs – First Past the Post (FPTP) – there are several issues with regards to disproportionality and systematic bias. However, Shell (2013, p. 35) suggests that legitimacy is not an issue as the peers have relevant expertise and experience dampening the issue with representation and legitimacy.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Compared to the Presidential system, the Parliamentary system is more favourable to a healthy democracy. This essay will discuss the relationship between the Parliamentary and Presidential systems’ executive and legislative powers and the ways they differ from one another. Within the Parliamentary system, the executive and legislative powers are fused together to set and control the government (Mintz et al. 331-332).…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Common law is expedient. It often reacts and responds faster to changing values and expectation. while parliament may take a long time to decide on the need for change, judges can do this whilst reviewing one case. The courts can also achieve reform faster because they are not bound by constraints of the legislative…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once Parliament has spoken through legislation, no court may look behind the validity of that Act. This aspect of the doctrine has its roots in Art 9 of the Bill of Rights, and it finds support in the so-called ‘enrolled Bill’ rule whereby a Bill is to be treated as an Act when it appears on…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Integration of the executive and legislature provides stability and efficiency in the operation of government. It is constitutional convention for the Prime Minister to be both head of the executive branch and leader of the majority party, and this gives the executive a larger degree of freedom of action. The UK constitution has been described as “a system that intentionally promotes efficiency over abstract concerns about tyranny.” To say that a constitution must either adhere to…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays