Chappple Vs Nestle Case Study

Improved Essays
These are a few cases of for the definition of consideration.

Re McArdle
A lady lived with her three grown up children in a house and one of her daughter in law did some decorating and later the ladies grown up children promise to pay the daughter in law $488.
There was a document signed between the daughter in law and the lady’s children so to make the promise effective.
It was held that the promise was not enforceable due to the fact that the promise was made after the act of the daughter law has been done. Therefore , in this case it is past consideration.

Lampleigh v Braithwait
In this case, the defendant which is Braithwait murdered someone and asked a favour from the plaintiff which is Lampleigh to give him a pardon today. Lampleigh
…show more content…
Both sides if the parties must understand that the conducted act is to be remunerated through payment or conferment of some benefit. This conferment or benefit, must fulfill the condition of being legally enforceable in the eyes of the law.

Chapple v Nestle
The defendant were running a special offer in which case the members of the public could earn a music record by sending off wrappers of Nestle’s chocolate bar with some money. Since the copyright of the records was owned by Chapple who claimed that there had been breaches to their copyright. The issue here raised was whether the three wrappers that were claimed by Nestle was part of the consideration
It was held that the wrappers were part of the valid consideration even though they have no value but in the eyes of the law, they are valuable. Price & Easton
Easton made a contract with x in return for x doing work for him. Easton will pay the price of $19 to x. The work was done by x but Eaton did not pay the amount he promised. This leads to Price being sued. It was held that Price claimed must fail and is invalid as he had not provided
…show more content…
Once the work had begun, it is clear that Williams underestimated the working cost and was involved in financial difficulties.
Roffey who was concerned about the work being not completed on time and that as a result they will be in trouble of falling foul of a penalty clause in their main contract with the owner agreed to pay Williams an extra payment per flat. Williams completed the work as he was abide to do so but did not received full payment. He quit the work and brought an action for damages in the COA. Roffey argued that Williams was only doing what he ws contractually bound t do and so there was no consideration provided on Roffey’s behalf.
It was held that when a party to an existing contract, agrees to pay an extra bonus on order to ensure that the other party performs his obligations under the contract then the agreement will be binding if the party whom agrees to pay the bonus has thereby obtained dome new practical advantage or avoided a disadvantage. In the present case there were benefits to Roffey including the issue of making sureWilliams continues his work, avoiding payment under a damages clause of the main contract if Williams was late in fulfilling his duties and or so including avoiding the expense and trouble of hiring another person to do his work. Therefore, Williams was entitled to the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Fourthly, the incomplete and ineffective work that LNPL has made had caused Mr Garae another expense and loss for him to engage with another contractor to come and complete the work. In this case, Mr Garae has made a big loss and that it contributes to reduction of market value of the private residential units, a reduction in the offer from a housing association for the affordable units and an increase in building costs. And also, he will lose his customers because he does not offer what was expected by the customer on time and that they are not happy with what they…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A breach of business contract is a term used when one or more conditions specified in business contract are not completed by first party or the second party. Consequently, it takes the issue of breach of contract to the court where the responsible party is sued to provide certain amount of money as substitute to damages that occurred because of their action. Moreover, Simon can claim his damages as well as discharge himself for any other conditions that he was further responsible to follow and complete. Even if Payn does not leave the band, but deliberately performs in inadequate or disappointing way can lead to legal actions against him. According to English law, when breach of contract occurs, the first party receives opportunity to address the issue of breach of contract in following ways: Monetary compensation: Payn will be responsible if Simon’s TV show receive low viewership or get into a loss.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mainor V. Nault Case Study

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Unlike in Mainor, where the attorney was able to obtain money damages for his client, Brenner did not obtain child support for Joyce. Similarly to Sorenson, where the attorney failed to properly handle a divorce decree resulting in financial loss for his client, Brenner’s failure to include child support in Joyce’s divorce proceeding resulted in her suffering financial hardship. It seems that the most obvious reason Joyce did not get child support was due to Brenner’s failure to demand it during the divorce proceedings. His lack of prudence and diligence directly caused Joyce to lose out on support she would have benefitted from. Without continued support from Joyce’s ex-husband, which Brenner did demand, Joyce will not be able to properly support herself or her child.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order for a modification to be valid, it has to contain mutual consideration, which is where both parties give something up that they have a legal right to. The Colton School was giving up an additional number of paid sick leave days, while O’Neal was giving up nothing. Thus, his attempted modification, even if accepted, would not be legally enforceable. The Colton School had a right to deny O’Neal’s modification. They also had the right to fire him because of his breach, or nonperformance, of the employment contract.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The courts ruled in favor of Coppage, establishing that liberty of contract was a fundamental right, and it is not the right of government to ensure equal bargaining powers. Fried would disagree with this ruling because he believes that contracts are binding and have to be followed. Coppage added the clause banning labor unions to the already agreed upon contracts causing there to be a breach in contract. Under Fried’s understanding of contracts and promises, this would make Coppage unethical and dishonest. This breach according to Fried’s views would also allow the employee to receive some type of reparation for the breach in contract.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill's Utilitarianism

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    consequence and ignored the backward-looking reasoning. Suppose someone made a promise to his friend, but then he realizes that not fulfilling the promise would slightly outweigh the utility of keeping the promise. In Mill’s calculation, the person should break his promise. He is not only morally permissible to do so; it is his moral obligation to do this as it would increase the end utility. But this cannot be right; the fact that he promised to his friend puts an obligation upon him and a little increase in utility cannot exempt him from it.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Benedict is likely to succeed on the grounds that Adrian’s cancellation of the contract was ineffective. But he is unlikely to succeed because the requirements for variation of Catherine’s share were not satisfied. The grounds for discussion are found in the Supreme Court decision in Mana…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parol Evidence Rule

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wiencek further argues that the trial court erred by considering “parol evidence to vary the effective date of the [B108 agreement] and to controvert the integration clause.” CHH, for its part, avers that the admission of parol evidence was proper because it was offered to determine whether the contract was effective. We hold that the circuit court did not violate the parole evidence rule because extrinsic evidence was not offered to add or modify any terms to the B108 agreement. Generally, parol or extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to vary the terms of an integrated contract. Foreman v. Melrod, 257 Md. 435, 441 (1970) (“‘All prior and contemporaneous negotiations are merged in the written instrument, which is treated as the exclusive…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the facts of cases, the minority shareholder has sued them on the profit that they have made. The issues here, whether the company can ratifies the diversion of contract. The court held is they cannot…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fur Coat Case Summary

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A case which did not pair was the Elvis case, where his fiancé was promised to have the balance paid for her mortgage. This case or “contract” was not enforceable because the promise would have been a gift, therefore having no grounds to be followed through on. The reason why this is considered a “gift” and unenforceable is because there is no exchange of anything, only Elvis giving (or in this case would have given) the money to pay off his fiancé’s mortgages. What a business (or society in general) might take away from the outcome of this caselet is that there must be an exchange in contracts (offer and acceptance), otherwise it would be considered a gift and…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays