Provincial Court System

Great Essays
In Canada, there are many rules and regulations that are followed by the citizens and members of the courts. The laws are practised in the provincial, federal and supreme courts. The provincial court is the lowest court in which cases are heard. “The court is an important place where public and private issues are resolved” (McCormick 1994, p.2). The justice system is based on an adversarial system in which the disputes that occur are represented by people who study the law. There are many representatives of the court such as the judge, lawyer, officer, court clerk and court reporter. All of the representatives assist in running the cases in court and by making the right decisions. The reason to study the members of the court is because they …show more content…
They sit in the front facing the judge and court clerk. Defendants that are the accused have lawyers who are also referred as attorneys. Lawyers represent the accused to ensure that they are proved innocent. They must evaluate the evidence and defend their clients. The lawyers role is “not to criticize anyone as an individual; rather it is to assess the validity and reliability of the evidence and testimony used by the prosecutor” (Goffman 2014, p. 264). During this, a lawyer must also be able to protect the legal rights of the client. Furthermore, the lawyer must insure that the accused receives the fairest trial and or is able to help the accused be dismissed from all charges on them. At first the lawyers use casual language that all people in the courtroom understand, however as soon as they use legal terms it is difficult for the other non-professionals to understand making the ambiance more intimidating (G. Musico, N. Gill, C. Nguyen and S. Dole). The lawyers are well prepared before a case, so when they approach the judge, they are quick enough to decide whether they need time, or what kind of questions they need to ask the …show more content…
The police officer or the deputy sheriff stands behind or beside the defendant. In the bail hearing court the officer was seen sitting down with a desk going over details of the people who would be appearing in court. On the other hand, there were two officers during the ‘Chad trial’ one was sitting beside the accused and the second officer was beside the witness. The police officer must ensure the safety of all people present at the court of the time being. The officer is the one who must bring the accused to the court. They maintain order in the courtroom and supervise the trails or any other cases being

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    When it comes to the defense attorneys, these are the individuals, who unlike the prosecutors protect the offenders. The offenders are able to hire their own attorney, however if they cannot pay for one, then they will have one appointed to them. The court proceedings are controlled by judges. A judge’s responsibility is to ensure that the law if adhered to and supervise what takes place within the courtroom setting. These individuals are the ones, who ultimately decide whether…

    • 1072 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Jury Decision Making Essay

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Typically jurors enter a trial setting believing that the defendant is guilty. It is the opposing legal counsel’s argument that sways their opinions. Overall, the prosecutor’s opening arguments; the jurors’ initial impression of the defendant(s) and the jurors’ personal values from an initial influence. The jurors use these stimuli to evaluate the case as the counselors present new statement and evidence, continually renewing this process through the trial. Once the juror had formed an opinion it is unlikely that they will change the verdict they…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The appellate courts look at the record and the written briefs filed by the defendant and the prosecutor of the appeal. The appellant will file a second brief in response to the prosecutor’s position and may hear oral arguments before reaching a decision. The burden of proof depends on previous evidence of the plaintiff’s previous evidence, as the appeal court cannot use new evidence in the attempt to appeal. Each stage of the criminal court process uses evidence in different ways to create a burden of proof that contributes to criminal justice investigations. Every step of the process describes different approaches to proving innocence or guilt of the defendant.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The courts include defense lawyers, prosecution, judges and juries. The job of the courts is to make sure the offenders are being given fair and upright lawsuits. Those who look for information,meaning the judges, listen to the case that is taking place and control the members to make sure that they are following all rules,laws, during the lawsuits. Particular cases have only a judge present while being tried, when others have a body of people that includes twelve citizens who made firm that the culpability or guiltlessness of a defendant proved by information that was brought while in trail. Sometimes judges make suggestions on how a sentence should be.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of his clients are put in situations where things leads to other events in which where a crime can be committed, whether intentionally or accidentally. Many of his clients are also being placed in a situation in the wrong time and the wrong place and need assistance into getting their voice heard in a hearing. All clients are shown respect and cannot be judged by the attorney, but only by the judge and the jury. To conclude my interview with Mr. Swan, ethics is very important in professional conduct especially with clients that are under 18.. Juveniles are given protection and confidentiality.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judges, much like magistrates, preside over court cases. They are seen as the umpires of court cases, ensuring that the rules are followed and that a fair trial is carried out. Judges sit in intermediate and superior courts (District and Supreme Courts). The role of the judge is to adjudicate in cases: the judge makes decisions about points of law and gives instructions to the jury to make sure that they understand the proceedings and evidence presented. Another role in the case was the judge’s associate, this role is a confidential secretary to the judge and is a clerk of the court in which the judge is presiding.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another important aspect of the legal accountability of police is judicial examination in the courts. This operates when judges and defence lawyers examine the quality and sources of police evidence. Evidence illegally such as through an illegal search or illegal telephone intercept is usually subject to the exclusionary rule as a deterrent to illegal conduct. The courts should also be alert for possible fabrications of evidence false evidence and the suppression of exculpatory evidence. Finally, a free Press is essential to police accountability.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Discovery. The plaintiff and defense attorneys study the case facts and evidence presented. Besides, they converse with witnesses in order to develop their trial strategy (Schubert, 2014). Plea bargaining. If the prosecutor has strong evidence, the defendant may plead guilty to get a lighter sentence or a dismissal of some…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Due Process Model

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This was shown with how the court proceeded formally and strict to procedures that protect the individual ensuring legal guilt as well how the witness and prosecution were constantly questioned in their methods. In all hearings the defendants were trialled fairly and with the respect of the court with consideration to who they all were as individuals. They were trialled upon their offences as a specific instance rather than the crime as a whole, highlighting the distinction between the use of the due process model contrary to the crime control model. Thus it can be concluded that the court sessions I observed reflected the due process model of…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In modern society, the perception of the courts is viewed with the most respect and authority to dispute the conflicts that arise from disputes regarding essences of the law. The judicial system throughout the world consists of three separate entities in a trial that leads to a legal ruling in regards to criminal law. The defense is responsible for providing a defense for the defendant as well as being able to ensure the protection of his rights. The prosecution represents the government and is responsible for establishing guilt of the defendant. In the midst of the two sides is the judge who is responsible to ensure court proceedings are properly held and to establish a verdict of the accused using evidence and witness testimonies attained by the defense and prosecution.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays