Cesare Borgia's Cruelty

Decent Essays
A prince should desire to be considered clement & not cruel, he should not misuse this clemency. Cesare Borgia was considered cruel, his cruelty unified & restored Romagna to peace & loyalty. As long as a prince keeps his people unified & loyal he shouldn‘t mind the reproach of cruelty, because he will be more powerful than those who allow disorders to arise, such as robberies & murders. Of all princes it is impossible to avoid cruelty. A prince should be slow to believe & to act. A prince should never show fear, but should go on with prudence & humanity. Too much confidence could make him incautious, but too much distrust would make him intolerable. A prince should inspire fear, & above all things he must keep his hands off the property of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli wrote "The Qualities of the Prince" in July 1513 in Florence, Italy, to convey his idea of the strong, active, and perfect ruler to the current ruling the Medicis. The work is remembered and responsible for bringing “Machiavellian” into wide usage as a pejorative term. The essay takes a stringent position on the proper way to govern a nation. With a straightforward logic, a relevant idea, and an expressed method, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of the Prince” is a practical guide for current…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince is a guide on how a proper prince should rule his nation. Machiavelli demonstrates how the past rulers have either been successful or not. Even as his audience were that of monarchs, many of his teachings’ outcomes can be seen in present day. In chapter 12, Machiavelli comments on the usage of mercenary troops.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In one section of the article, Vincent Barnett discusses some of the alternative ways that Machiavelli’s The Prince can be interpreted. One interpretation was that Machiavelli possibly intended for his writing to be satirical, because certain facts, such as how Machiavelli had a family, refute his statement from the pamphlet that he believes all humans are evil. Also, it is possible that Machiavelli didn’t actually agree with the ideas in his writing, but he only wrote those things to gain favor from the leaders of his time. These are just possibilities, but knowing about Machiavelli’s life and his situation are important in order to understand his motives for writing The Prince. Just like Machiavelli, present-day leaders and authors make…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Italian cities, there was much conflict and arguments amongst the Borgia family who were focused on trying to seize and maintain power. Machiavelli in response, devised a text, The Prince, which illustrates how to run an effectual government. In The Prince, he also describes how the good and effective rulers have to learn “not to be good,” and that they have to be prepared and willing to put aside ethical concerns of justice and kindness, in order to preserve the balance of the state. This logic was atrocious to peers around him, for they were used to the old medieval ideas of ruling where the king was chosen by God to serve as someone on earth, who manages the law. They also saw that the ruler/king was an all-powerful human being with…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli is smart and a strategic author. There are many ways on how to interpret his famous work, “The Prince”. It is intriguing that Machiavelli did not provide a title for the book. In doing so, Machiavelli shows his strategic writing to challenge the reader. To read the book and accept it in a literal sense is questionable.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He raises the question of whether it is better for a leader to be loved or feared by the public. He answers with the statement, “The reply is, that one ought to be both feared and loved, but as it is difficult for the two to go together, it is much safer to be feared than loved, if one of the two has to be wanting” (69). Machiavelli backs up this statement by saying that a leader who is feared can make decisions and execute orders much more effectively. He thinks a prince should be trusting to a certain degree, but should always be prepared for disaster, saying, “And the prince who has relied solely on their words, without making other preparations, is ruined…” (69). Machiavelli’s thought initially seems negative, as he lacks faith in the public to remain loyal to their prince.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once upon a time in a castle somewhere in England there lived a prince, Prince Philip. The prince had all that he would ask for everything except love. His parents were cruel and harsh they were proud and they cared about their money more than him. But he was much different than them. The prince was humble and kind.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He gives a couple of characteristic that any prince should follow which include being stingy, being cruel, being feared, break promises, and choosing wise advisors. Machiavelli argues that a prince or anyone in the path of becoming a prince should know that a good governance comes from prince that will be able to maintain his power above anyone else without running the risk of being hated by his citizens. One of Machiavelli's most important point is that if the prince had…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Cicero argues that it is best for a prince to be both loved and fear. However, this balance is very hard to maintain, therefore Cicero argues it is better for a prince to be feared than loved. Cicero explains that subjects are more likely to respect a leader if they fear him. He uses the examples of Hannibal and Scipio to display this. Hannibal was very cruel but very skilled, this resulted in his terrified soldiers respecting him.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Morals of the Prince is written by Italian diplomat Niccolo Machiavelli; in which it was published as “The Prince,” in 1532 during the Renaissance era. Many of Machiavelli’s theories are birthed from the encounters of the Medici dynasty. Machiavelli wrote The Prince to exhibit how Princes ought to live versus how they truly live in terms of dealing with their subjects and friends. Machiavelli executes his claims successfully through the use of rhetorical appeals portrayed in this treatise.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cesare Borgia became a prince by his father's influence, and, despite his best efforts, could not maintain his state after his father's influence failed. This was not his fault, but was caused by extraordinary bad luck. Alexander VI wanted to make his son great, but had no troops he could rely on. Alexander allowed the French into Italy in exchange for the use of their troops to conquer the Romagna region. Borgia succeeded and made more conquests, but worried about the French king and the loyalty of his Roman troops, led by the Orsini family.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli’s Attitude Toward Human Nature: Is It Accurate? Machiavelli is often criticised for his attitude toward human nature, being seen as overly cynical of humanity. However, is this portrayal of Machiavelli warranted, or are his viewpoints justified? By analyzing key points made in The Qualities of the Prince and comparing these arguments to real world examples, it is possible to determine whether Machiavelli’s beliefs regarding human nature are sound. There is one portion of his essay in particular where it is easy to accuse Machiavelli of being overly misanthropic: the section concerning whether it is preferable for a leader to be cruel or merciful; Machiavelli argues that it is better to be seen as too cruel than too merciful.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At face value, The Prince and the Discourses seem to have a conflicting nature, but both texts focus on the administration of a state and present textual similarities. Much of what Machiavelli writes in The Prince reinforces the Discourses, echoing both stylistically and thematically. Machiavelli uses pragmatic methods in both and accentuates the importance of historical studies. In The Prince, there is a significant amount of reference to Cesare Borgia, a man that Machiavelli admires, and he states, “I shall never hesitate to cite Cesare Borgia and his actions,” and his views on virtue and fortune come out of Borgia’s narrative . For Machiavelli, Borgia is the superlative example of a man who can compel any individual to do the distasteful…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One example of this is the way that Machiavelli believes power should be taken, by violent actions such as murder. “For it must be noted, that men must either be caressed or annihilated; they will revenge themselves for small injuries, but cannot do so for great ones; the injury therefore that we do to a man must be such that we need not fear his vengeance” (Machiavelli, 11). In today’s society, ‘Machiavellian’ techniques can be seen as ‘harsh’ and ‘cruel’. In addition, Machiavelli’s teachings mostly deal with monarchies and the problems that they face. “I will not here speak of republics, having already treated of them fully in another place.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s understanding of virtue and effective rule emphasizes the maintenance of political power and the disregard for morality, differing from the ideology of the classic political philosophers. Machiavelli’s concept of virtue is centered around the glorification of a ruler, facilitated by behavioural traits such as bravery, cleverness, deceptiveness, and ruthlessness. Effective rule requires these attributes, as the successful application of these characteristics towards the acquisition and maintenance of power will allow one to become a powerful leader. Machiavelli first explains the foundations of various principalities, such as hereditary and mixed principalities, as the maintenance of power differs…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays