Society are judged based upon their wealth and the crime percentage. Will state most of his ideas and explain how it can help make a society better. (1) judge’s powers to be limited to determining guilty or innocence; (2) all accused citizens be judged publicly and by an impartial jury; (3) the laws must be made comprehensible to everyone; (4) the law be stated and applied generally and systematically; (5) the burden of proof be on the court; (6) defendants found innocence be restored their civil rights; and (7) all accusation be made public. Another one of his ideas is that punishment be used as a deter. We realize a long time ago as people that punishment is needed so that people that get out of line do not convince more people to get out line. He also wanted to make sure that punishment is swift, severe and certain to strike fear in people. With his ideas it tries it best to get rid of people to use the law to better themselves or destroy someone else. Also it makes sure the judges have only to do one job and also get rid of instance where the job tries to interpret things the way they want to. The problem with …show more content…
William Graham Sumner believe to get the best out of people would be competition. To get better people in your society one will have to rid itself of the people that cannot care for themselves. Thomas Malthus term the phrase “Survivor of the fittest” where the people that can care for themselves do that and the ones that cannot end up not making it. Sumner disdain the poor because they were not able to participate in the competition of life. Without competition nothing is aspire to get better or force people to improve themselves. People would argue with a competitive society like this at some point the strong would become the weak and replaced by something else but no one can stop progress. If people do not inspire to do better for themselves or their family, they will just put themselves at the bottom of the society and it is no one's fault but their