Throughout the entire article Chavez discusses the effectiveness as well as the benefits of nonviolent resistance in contrast to the …show more content…
Towards the middle of the article he includes a brief discourse mentioning Ghandi, an immensely successful nonviolent protestor who was located in India. In paragraph nine, Chavez explains how "the boycott, as Ghandi taught, is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change"(61-62). Here he is describing how and why Ghandi was so successful and mentions it to advocate for his claim on the importance of maintaining nonviolent acts even in the situtation they are being forced to deal with. Later in the article Chaves brings up another point in history where he explains that the poor, or "the workers," are the ones who die when it comes to "violent revolution"(79). By bringing up these historical points he is reminding his audience that the likelihood of them achieving their goal is drastically decreased if they decide to resort to violence, which also aids him in gaining